@shacker@forschungstorte Wow, it doesn’t? That’s unconscionable. What’s the deal, @ivory?
(I just downloaded the app to test but I’m not going to subscribe just to see whether or not it allows accessible toots or not as posting is a premium feature.)
PS. Thanks for adding the alt text in. Will boost now.
@mcg@aral@forschungstorte@ivory It is not supported on iOS. I filed a bug report and they acknowledged it. They’ll get to it. This is the entirety of their Share Sheet currently.
@shacker@mcg@aral@forschungstorte Yes we don't have alt text support in the share sheet yet. It's on our list of things to add. We recommend adding media from within the app compose view which does allow you to add alt text.
@ivory@mcg@aral@forschungstorte For sure, that is a workaround that works, but unfortunately, there’s no way to access images in the Lightroom mobile app from there. I’d have to export from Lightroom to Apple Photos, and then post directly from with the I Ivory app - quite a workaround.
@ivory@aral@shacker@forschungstorte I can definitely confirm that this work in #Ivory since the beginning. Using it all the time ... find it quite conveniently implemented actually.
@dharrison@maxheadroom@ivory@aral@forschungstorte Of course I know how to do it from within Ivory! I’m talking about adding all text while posting an image to Ivory from the share sheet. That is the missing feature that Ivery acknowledges. Going back to the post and adding alt text afterwards is a workaround, not a solution.
@ivory@aral@shacker@forschungstorte Yeahp. Ivory has been my Masto app since release and I alway add alt text. You just tap the photo after attaching it. Maybe they just don’t realize the workflow.
@forschungstorte@shacker Also, our entire legal system and morality is based on intolerance of certain behaviors. The paradox of tolerance vanishes as soon as behaviors the paradox is involved to protect are illegal or immoral.
@shacker Having tolerance as a contract makes it something optional, one can just not accept the contract and then they can be intolerant - meaning that intolerance wouldn’t have to be stopped, just wouldn’t be protected
@shacker Since some folks seems to be debating what tolerance means, I will drop a link to Scott Alexander's excellent (if characteristically long) piece on the subject.
The key part is the two parables at the beginning.
@Crell@shacker
I think he's playing a shell game there. If you look at it as utility functions, intolerance is like a dependent utility function, your preferences depend on someone else preferences/actions ("keeping up with the Joneses", the SUV-embiggening road arms race), and in a different category from independent utility functions ("I like turtles").
And also, there's personal, versus social, professional, and legal, which place higher and higher restrictions on expressed preferences.
Add comment