archlinux, to archlinux
@archlinux@fosstodon.org avatar

The Arch Linux Ports has been accepted and released!

https://rfc.archlinux.page/0032-arch-linux-ports/

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9562: Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs)

Ce normalise les , une famille d'identificateurs uniques, obtenus sans registre central. Il remplace l'ancienne norme, le RFC 4122, avec pas mal de nouveautés et un RFC complètement refait.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9562.html

dvzrv, to archlinux
@dvzrv@chaos.social avatar

The ports is accepted and ready to be merged and published: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/32

Although it was a long journey, I'm happy it is now ratified.
Thanks to everyone who spent time writing and reviewing it and provided valuable feedback!

There is still a lot of work ahead adapting and improving our tooling and I hope many will join in this effort.

Here is to on many more architectures in the future 🥂

(meanwhile I have three more RFCs in the pipeline 😅)

jeffpc, to random
@jeffpc@mastodon.radio avatar

Oooh, the new defines 4 new uuid versions!
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9562.html

smallcircles, to fediverse
@smallcircles@social.coop avatar
shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Je pars en vacances et bim, une nouvelle option . Pour remonter des erreurs.

9567: Error Reporting
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9567

imperator, to php
@imperator@freifunk.social avatar

@pollita I just read the called "RFC1867 for non-POST HTTP verbs". You were the only one voting "No" - I wonder why. Was that a "No, we don't need that" or did you have specific reason, maybe a technical one?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc1867-non-post

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9567: DNS Error Reporting

Ce nouveau propose un système pour permettre aux résolveurs de prévenir les serveurs faisant autorité qu'il y a un problème dans leur zone.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9567.html

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9547: Report from the IAB Workshop on Environmental Impact of Internet Applications and Systems

La question de l'empreinte environnementale du numérique suscite beaucoup de débats. L'IAB avait organisé en 2022 un atelier sur le cas de l'empreinte environnementale de l'Internet dont ce est le compte-rendu.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9547.html

Ping @nitot @pb

DiazCarrete, (edited ) to haskell
@DiazCarrete@hachyderm.io avatar

https://hackage.haskell.org/package/network-uri-2.6.4.2/docs/Network-URI.html#g:2
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/a/56844/89929

"A relative reference that begins with a single slash character is termed an absolute-path reference. A relative reference that does not begin with a slash character is termed a relative-path reference."

shaedrich, to php
@shaedrich@mastodon.online avatar

The by @ilutov and @Crell for .4 has just been unanimously accepted 🎉 https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property-hooks

shaft, (edited ) to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Generating signatures using the private keys from 9500 (a bunch a publicly known private keys, which is a strange concept 🤔) : it works nicely. :3 The keytag for "testECCP256" is 56715 or 56716 (whether it's a ZSK or a KSK).

The RFC lacks ed25519 and ed448 keys though

shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Last Sunday (April 7th) was the 55th birthday of 1 (Document dated : “7 April 1969) ! 🥳🥳🍰🍰🍾

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1

dmm, to internet
@dmm@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Happy birthday RFC 1!

RFC 1 was published on in 1969. Impressive work and insight by Steve and by the IETF community over the last 55 years/9K+ RFCs.

Well done!

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9340: Architectural Principles for a Quantum Internet

Voici un assez futuriste qui explore à quoi pourrait ressembler un futur « Internet » . Je divulgâche tout de suite : ce ne sera pas de si tôt.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9340.html

shaft, to ai
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

"The recent advances in artificial intelligence () such as large language models enable the design of the Faster than LIght speed Protocol () for Internet. FLIP provides a way to avoid congestion, enhance security, and deliver faster packets on the Internet by using AI to predict future packets at the receiving peer before they arrive. This document describes the protocol, its various encapsulations, and some operational considerations."

9564: Faster Than Light Speed Protocol (FLIP)
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9564.html

shaft, to random
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

And v3 of Terminology has been published as 9499 \o/

(v2 was 8499 and v1 7719. I hope v4 will be 9999)

3 versions in 5 years :') (7719 was published in January 2019)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9499

archlinux, to archlinux
@archlinux@fosstodon.org avatar
shaft, to random
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Looks like an interesting (experimental)

RFC 9539: Unilateral Opportunistic Deployment of Encrypted Recursive-to-Authoritative

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9539

shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Is there any known implementation of 1149 not using columbidae (pigeons or doves)? Because the RFC does say avian carriers, meaning any bird could transport IP. That would bring passionate debates about the differences of MTU between African and European swallow 😬

shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

"ohttp" is now officialy the 8th wonder of the "Service Parameter Keys (SvcParamKeys)" registry :)

(And is the easiest to process when decoding a RR :) )

9540: Discovery of Oblivious Services via Service Binding Records
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9540

shaft, to random
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Oh dear.

“This document describes a mechanism for creating, encoding, and verifying digital signatures or message authentication codes over components of an message”

9421: HTTP Message Signatures
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9421

NGIZero, to random
@NGIZero@mastodon.xyz avatar

Tomorrow we'll host a webinar on the GNU Name System (GNS) and the road to publishing an RFC.

Thursday Feb 22, 13.00 CET.

GNS provides a privacy-enhancing alternative to the Domain Name System. It was published as an . RFC authors Martin Schanzenbach & Bernd Fix will explain GNS and how the RFC process works.
Stephen Farrell advises on working with bodies.
The is open to all. You can find the link to the BBB platform here: https://nlnet.nl/webinars/

NGIZero, to random
@NGIZero@mastodon.xyz avatar

Join the on the GNU Name System (GNS) and the road to publishing an RFC.
GNS is a decentralized and censorship-resistant domain name resolution protocol providing an alternative to DNS. In 2023 the GNS was published as RFC 9498. The authors of the Martin Schanzenbach & Bernd Fix will talk about GNS & the road to published an RFC.
Stephen Farrell of Tolerant Networks will talk about getting advice with processes.

February 22 at 13.00 CET https://nlnet.nl/webinars/

shaft, (edited ) to til
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

In 883 (the original not-yet-called-DNS), the serial in a SOA record was only 16-bits (unsigned).

The value already “wraps and should be compared using sequence space arithmetic” (this exact same wording is in RFC 1035. The arithmetic will be clearly defined in 1996 ^^ - RFC 1982)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • vwfavf
  • tacticalgear
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines