shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Is there any known implementation of 1149 not using columbidae (pigeons or doves)? Because the RFC does say avian carriers, meaning any bird could transport IP. That would bring passionate debates about the differences of MTU between African and European swallow 😬

NGIZero, to random
@NGIZero@mastodon.xyz avatar

Tomorrow we'll host a webinar on the GNU Name System (GNS) and the road to publishing an RFC.

Thursday Feb 22, 13.00 CET.

GNS provides a privacy-enhancing alternative to the Domain Name System. It was published as an . RFC authors Martin Schanzenbach & Bernd Fix will explain GNS and how the RFC process works.
Stephen Farrell advises on working with bodies.
The is open to all. You can find the link to the BBB platform here: https://nlnet.nl/webinars/

smallcircles, to fediverse
@smallcircles@social.coop avatar
bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9547: Report from the IAB Workshop on Environmental Impact of Internet Applications and Systems

La question de l'empreinte environnementale du numérique suscite beaucoup de débats. L'IAB avait organisé en 2022 un atelier sur le cas de l'empreinte environnementale de l'Internet dont ce est le compte-rendu.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9547.html

Ping @nitot @pb

NGIZero, to random
@NGIZero@mastodon.xyz avatar

Join the on the GNU Name System (GNS) and the road to publishing an RFC.
GNS is a decentralized and censorship-resistant domain name resolution protocol providing an alternative to DNS. In 2023 the GNS was published as RFC 9498. The authors of the Martin Schanzenbach & Bernd Fix will talk about GNS & the road to published an RFC.
Stephen Farrell of Tolerant Networks will talk about getting advice with processes.

February 22 at 13.00 CET https://nlnet.nl/webinars/

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9567: DNS Error Reporting

Ce nouveau propose un système pour permettre aux résolveurs de prévenir les serveurs faisant autorité qu'il y a un problème dans leur zone.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9567.html

dvzrv, to python
@dvzrv@chaos.social avatar

Yay, my about sources for packaging has been merged.

https://rfc.archlinux.page/0020-sources-for-python-packaging/

shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Ah! 's Special-Use Domain Name Registry gained an new entry.

9476: The .alt Special-Use Top-Level Domain

“This document reserves the .alt label for use as an unmanaged pseudo-TLD namespace. The .alt label can be used in any domain name as a pseudo-TLD to signify that this is an alternative (non-DNS) namespace and should not be looked up in a context”

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9476

dvzrv, to random
@dvzrv@chaos.social avatar

When it comes to recent developments in the space, I can highly recommend this read:
https://blog.pgpkeys.eu/critique-critique

jeffpc, to random
@jeffpc@mastodon.radio avatar

Oooh, the new defines 4 new uuid versions!
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9562.html

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9562: Universally Unique IDentifiers (UUIDs)

Ce normalise les , une famille d'identificateurs uniques, obtenus sans registre central. Il remplace l'ancienne norme, le RFC 4122, avec pas mal de nouveautés et un RFC complètement refait.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9562.html

shaft, to random
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

And v3 of Terminology has been published as 9499 \o/

(v2 was 8499 and v1 7719. I hope v4 will be 9999)

3 versions in 5 years :') (7719 was published in January 2019)

https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9499

Annle, to Podcast German
@Annle@chaos.social avatar

+++ Breaking News+++

Es wird im August eine weitere Folge „Request for comments“ geben.

Und ich brauche wohl nen Podcast Account @rstockm

dmm, to internet
@dmm@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Happy birthday RFC 1!

RFC 1 was published on in 1969. Impressive work and insight by Steve and by the IETF community over the last 55 years/9K+ RFCs.

Well done!

bortzmeyer, to random French
@bortzmeyer@mastodon.gougere.fr avatar

RFC 9340: Architectural Principles for a Quantum Internet

Voici un assez futuriste qui explore à quoi pourrait ressembler un futur « Internet » . Je divulgâche tout de suite : ce ne sera pas de si tôt.

https://www.bortzmeyer.org/9340.html

dgoosens, to php
@dgoosens@phpc.social avatar
parleur, to random French
@parleur@mastodon.parleur.net avatar

Le prochain qui me demande de préciser si c’est bien un « tiret du 6 » dans le nom de domaine de mon adresse mail, je lui fais recopier 10 fois une sur les prise au hasard.

dvzrv, to archlinux
@dvzrv@chaos.social avatar

The ports is accepted and ready to be merged and published: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/32

Although it was a long journey, I'm happy it is now ratified.
Thanks to everyone who spent time writing and reviewing it and provided valuable feedback!

There is still a lot of work ahead adapting and improving our tooling and I hope many will join in this effort.

Here is to on many more architectures in the future 🥂

(meanwhile I have three more RFCs in the pipeline 😅)

shaft, to random
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Internet-over-HTTP. Literally this time

9484: Proxying in
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9484.html

harrysintonen, to random

Earlier today
decided to misrepresent projects' decision to follow and guidance to avoid leaking DNS requests. https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/ports/-/commit/3173d64b4bc01c0c1c258fe5191c65ea0a766181

Calling this decision some kind of attempt to "prevent working within a human rights-centric environment" is disingenuous and bad faith.

kevinbowen, to random
@kevinbowen@fosstodon.org avatar

What's old is new again. Explicit Congestion Notification(ECN) is growing up(?).

https://www.theverge.com/23655762/l4s-internet-apple-comcast-latency-speed-bandwidth

kevinbowen,
@kevinbowen@fosstodon.org avatar

To learn how the sausage is made, see RFC9330 "Low Latency, Low Loss, and Scalable Throughput (L4S) Internet Service: Architecture"

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9330/

imperator, to php

@pollita I just read the called "RFC1867 for non-POST HTTP verbs". You were the only one voting "No" - I wonder why. Was that a "No, we don't need that" or did you have specific reason, maybe a technical one?
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rfc1867-non-post

DiazCarrete, (edited ) to haskell
@DiazCarrete@hachyderm.io avatar

https://hackage.haskell.org/package/network-uri-2.6.4.2/docs/Network-URI.html#g:2
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/a/56844/89929

"A relative reference that begins with a single slash character is termed an absolute-path reference. A relative reference that does not begin with a slash character is termed a relative-path reference."

shaft, to random French
@shaft@piaille.fr avatar

Je pars en vacances et bim, une nouvelle option . Pour remonter des erreurs.

9567: Error Reporting
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9567

archlinux, to archlinux
@archlinux@fosstodon.org avatar

The Arch Linux Ports has been accepted and released!

https://rfc.archlinux.page/0032-arch-linux-ports/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • everett
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines