jan, to random
@jan@toot.io avatar

You think Chrome is fast?

Firefox has surpassed Chrome on Speedometer 🚀

Firefox cares about your Privacy 🛟

Give it a try!

https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?timerange=31536000&series=mozilla-central,3735773,1,13&series=mozilla-central,3412459,1,13

ppatel, to ai
@ppatel@mstdn.social avatar

My first reaction to Google IO is laughter. Throwing everything but the kitchen sink at the buzz word--especially the Android part of the presentation. That wall paper thing was the worst 7 minutes I've ever spent and that I'll never get back.

The responsible AI discussion would have gone far better if Google hadn't fired Timnet Gebru and Margaret Mitchell.

Overall, there just was no strategy. seems scattered and reactive.

Notice that will be required for a lot.

ppatel,
@ppatel@mstdn.social avatar

So I'd need for Microsoft services and for Google services. I want to use neither of those. All of a sudden, wars have a completely different definition.

This bifurcation is not good.

nixCraft, (edited ) to random
@nixCraft@mastodon.social avatar

Poll: Do you think the Web browser war is over (FYI, as of Feb/2023, Chrome has 79.7%, ME-Edge, 8.6%, Mozilla Firefox 4.8%, and Apple Safari has a 3.9% market share)? Please share for a broad reach. TIA.

duncan_blues,
@duncan_blues@norden.social avatar

@nixCraft I have long since decided for myself that one-for-all doesn't (and will never again) cut it.
Personally I'm a devoted Firefox user and just about all my daily work is done with it. I will not, on principle, use any M$ browser ever again unless forced at gunpoint.
On the few occasions where Firefox just doesn't work right, I'm now using Brave (Chromium engine but without Google spying on me).
I think ratio is about 97% Firefox and 3% Brave.

oblomov, to blink182
@oblomov@sociale.network avatar

I don't think people appreciate the role that played in fostering the and during the first (when the was still built on their proprietary engine), and a fortiori the role it had in their demise (when they switched to being “just another /‌ skin”), despite their browser never even reaching a 3% market share.

oblomov,
@oblomov@sociale.network avatar

I'm sure people have different ideas about what does it mean to support the . I think first and foremost it means allowing users (on both sides of the connection) to use the protocols and file formats of their choice. Every time a browser fails to implement (or worse decides to remove) support for a standard protocol or file format, it's failing the open web. Half-assing implementation of web standards was basically 's staple behavior during the first .

oblomov,
@oblomov@sociale.network avatar

But the worst here isn't that is actively against the : it's that in contrast to the first , there is really nobody left to stand up to them.
Consider for example @davew's write-up on Google's effort to deprecate
http://this.how/googleAndHttp/
and consider that , the only actual alternative, is also on Google's page:
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2015/04/30/deprecating-non-secure-http/
albeit less aggressively so.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • Durango
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • kavyap
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • ngwrru68w68
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines