What if we changed the rules so that if a US presidential candidate that supports arming Israel’s ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people wins, 15,000 American kids are randomly chosen and killed. (Unlike Palestinian kids, they’d be killed as painlessly as possible, not screaming in anguish from having been blown apart by American bombs.)
What would you do? Still vote for Biden as is or move heaven and earth to have him change his policies and/or get the Democrats to pick another candidate?
Me, about to go on a rant about how everyone has missed the -entire- point of Markdown:
it's not markup.
Me, predicting future complaints:
"Your markdown doesn't render right for me."
"Oh you need to have FlibbertyGizbits plugin and TableWax extension and and and..."
Missing. The. Entire. Point.
It's not that there shouldn't be something like that for layout and formatting--there's a demand. Call it something else to avoid creating a dependency issue.
IPA doing IPA things again. Released a review showing AAP FactCheck and RMIT FactLab were "favourable" to left poli's 65% of the time and right poli's 35%.
me: it's absurd that censorship of toplessness is applied only if you "look female," while those who "look male" are allowed to go topless anywhere they like without consequence. Either ban ALL #nipples or NO nipples.
Cis male #nudist / #naturist: yeah full body #nudity (including genitals) should be allowed in public and online
I keep seeing anti-gun regulation people with signs and t-shirts that read "Ban idiots, not guns" and as a person who's read a whole lot of data and statistics on gun ownership and safety, I have some real bad news for them...
People complaining that the claims of the #Fediverse being resistant to #corporateTakeover are at odds with the proposal to #faceblock Meta are kind of #missingThePoint about how the Fediverse can defend itself from corporate takeover.