@chrisgeidner@journa.host
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

chrisgeidner

@chrisgeidner@journa.host

It’s me. SCOTUS, law & politics — including LGBTQ, post-Roe, criminal law, and democracy issues — at Law Dork. / Sober. Queer. Bipolar. Buckeye. Theater. Runner. Gaymer.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

"A 6-3 Supreme Court means what it means: If they want it, they get it." At Law Dork, my look at the term that just ended. https://www.lawdork.com/p/6-3-supreme-court-means-what-it-means

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: rules that, under the First Amendment, Colorado nondiscrimination law cannot force a website designer to send a message with which she disagrees. Gorsuch writes the 6-3 decision for the court. Sotomayor writes the dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects the Biden administration's student loan forgiveness plan. The HEROES Act does NOT authorize student loan cancelation, Roberts holds for the 6-3 court, finding that Missouri has standing. Kagan writes the dissent. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22-506_nmip.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

In the final three major decisions of the Supreme Court's term, the same 6-3 partisan-divide, conservative majority ended affirmative action, wrote an exemption into non-discrimination laws, and struck down a major Biden administration policy to relieve student loan debt.

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

FULL UPDATE: Two-injunction Wednesday — Law Dork on the Kentucky and Tennessee rulings that halt state officials from enforcing two anti-trans laws that were due to go into effect in the coming days. https://www.lawdork.com/p/kentucky-ban-on-trans-care-for-minors-blocked

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

UPDATE: Kentucky and Tennessee bans on trans care for minors are likely unconstitutional, blocked —>

https://www.lawdork.com/p/kentucky-ban-on-trans-care-for-minors-blocked

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: Federal judge — appointed by Trump — rules that Tennessee’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors is likely unconstitutional, issues statewide injunction, the second such ruling TODAY. More to come at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

The ruling finds that plaintiffs lacked standing as to the surgery ban, so those provisions of the Tennessee law are not enjoined by this lawsuit.

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

My Law Dork report is somewhat updated to include news of the Tennessee ruling —> https://www.lawdork.com/p/kentucky-ban-on-trans-care-for-minors-blocked

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Another federal judge found that another anti-trans ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors is likely unconstitutional: Today, it was Kentucky’s SB150. Preliminary injunction granted. New, at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/p/kentucky-ban-on-trans-care-for-minors-blocked

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: Federal judge grants preliminary injunction against Kentucky's ban on gender-affirming care for minors: "[T]he Court finds that Plaintiffs have shown a strong likelihood of success on the merits of their constitutional challenges to SB 150 ...." https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.kywd.130277/gov.uscourts.kywd.130277.61.0.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

US District Judge David Hale, an Obama appointee, left no doubt about the scope of this preliminary injunction: It is a "facial injunction," barring the state from enforcing the new law's puberty blocker and testosterone bans at all, against anyone.

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: Florida is appealing last Friday’s preliminary injunction against its new anti-drag law to the 11th Circuit. Background at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/p/florida-anti-drag-law-likely-unconstitutional

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

REJECTS THE "INDEPENDENT STATE LEGISLATURE" SCHEME. In Moore v. Harper, Roberts writes for the court that state elections legislation is still subject to ordinary state judicial review. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1271_3f14.pdf

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

OK, Law Dork is done for the day … because I have a feeling once things start tomorrow, they’re not really stopping ’til they’re done.

Read up and sign up now, before 10a Tuesday — when we’re expecting more opinions: https://www.lawdork.com/p/supreme-court-big-decisions-coming

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

BREAKING: Federal judge rules Florida is barred from enforcing the state's new anti-drag law (SB 1438), granting a preliminary injunction in the case brought by Hamburger Mary's. More to come at Law Dork: https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Order denying Florida's motion to dismiss and granting Hamburger Mary's preliminary injunction request: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.414413/gov.uscourts.flmd.414413.29.0.pdf

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

NEW: Here's my breaking news report at Law Dork on today's ruling against Florida's anti-drag law. https://www.lawdork.com/p/florida-anti-drag-law-likely-unconstitutional

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar
chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Subscribe to Law Dork for extensive coverage of the litigation against these anti-trans (and some more broad anti-LGBTQ) laws. https://www.lawdork.com/

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

Had an evening of obligations & just coming back to this now. I would, first, remind folks that this is — as Judge Hinkle notes in the opinion — effectively a related case the Doe preliminary injunction issued on June 6 (w/ borrowed language).

See: https://www.lawdork.com/p/florida-ruling-trans-care-ban-minors

chrisgeidner, to random
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

“Transgender care is not experimental care.” - U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr., striking down Arkansas’s ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors as unconstitutional on multiple grounds

Read the full report at Law Dork. https://www.lawdork.com/p/arkansas-trans-minors-care-ban-unconstitutional

Popehat, to random

I know some of you don’t have WSJ subscriptions but I don’t want you to miss the deep thoughts of Justice Alito so here I handled it

chrisgeidner,
@chrisgeidner@journa.host avatar

@Popehat lol ken

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines