davidrevoy, to physics
@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org avatar

Kicking Erwin Schrödinger out of my idols. Not because he chose a cat for his thought experiment, but because of one thing I learnt: he sexually abused children and kept a diary about it. 🤮 Src: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erwin_Schr%C3%B6dinger#Sexual_abuse

Rasta, to machinelearning
@Rasta@mstdn.ca avatar

Is it too long? I am listening to music now, but I watched this earlier, 30 min #listen

"The World From Another Point Of View" ~ Richard Feynman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNhlNSLQAFE 34m #Interview
#Physicist #RichardFeynman #NobelLaureate #PointOfView #Learning #Physics

j_bertolotti, to physics
@j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyz avatar

A little classical mechanics problem you can solve without doing any calculation:
Consider the hyper-simplified problem of a bell-shaped hill, and a point rock that can slide without friction up and down the hill. If you start with the rock at the bottom, and give it exactly the kinetic energy needed to arrive to the top and stop there without sliding on the other side, how long will it take to arrive there?

chemoelectric, to science
@chemoelectric@masto.ai avatar

I am gradually writing an explainer of the great error they are making in the community, by believing that John Bell’s arguments are logically sound. The arguments are thoroughly fallacious.

Here is the latest version of the explainer: https://crudfactory.com/Bell-assumes-his-conclusion.pdf

And here is ConTeXt source code for the explainer: https://sourceforge.net/p/chemoelectric/Bell-assumes-his-conclusions

freemo, to physics
@freemo@qoto.org avatar

When a particle decays and spits off some alpha radiation why doesnt it take with it some of the electrons from its parent particle? I would expect the electrons to "stick" to the helium nucleus and travel with it.

I am guessing it is a matter of moment. The alpha particle flys off at such speed the resting moment of the electrons may make it so they cant follow it... but considering that electrons arent at "rest" and that they have very very little mass I question myself on this answer.

chemoelectric, to physics
@chemoelectric@masto.ai avatar

This is the sort of TO DO notes I write.

I'm debating with myself whether to write it in Python, and so pretend it's best to use a language physicists know, or Ada, and thus a language that doesn't suck and which everyone can read. Then also I can recommend translation to Python as an exercise for the reader who actually cares. (I, after all, came up with such stuff by translating from a mere sketchy description of a program that I think was in Scilab.)

quantensalat, to hamradio
@quantensalat@astrodon.social avatar

student project update: it works!!!

After some modification to the amplifier, the oscillation has been suppressed enough. The dipole had to be shortened 15% or so due to the proximity to ground and buildings but no matter, the system works.

We got immediate spots in Great Britain on our first transmission cycle - in broad daylight @ 40m using our club call sign.

The dipole has a metal facade directly to the east, which might explain the directionality of the spots

image/jpeg

SrRochardBunson, to vinyl

Scientists Invent New Glass With Supreme Toughness (scitechdaily.com)

Scientists have produced an oxide glass with unprecedented toughness. Under high pressures and temperatures, they succeeded in paracrystallizing an aluminosilicate glass: The resulting crystal-like structures cause the glass to withstand very high stresses and are retained under ambient conditions.

freemo, to space
@freemo@qoto.org avatar

Interesting fact of the day: Not counting point sources of light, any source of light that doesnt appear as a single point will have the same brightness no matter what distance you happen to be from it.

In fact the opposite is true in a sense. Once you get close enough to an object that you can no longer see the whole object within your field of view, then it will get less bright as you get closer.

Amazingly this even applies to the sun. IF you were at the surface of the sun, just a few feet away (Such that 1 meter square of the surface of the sun was within your field of vision) it would only appear to be 93 lumens bright. That would be equivalent to only a 6 watt incandescent light bulb! Compare that to the brightness of the sun from earth which is a whopping 127,000 lumens.

jaztrophysicist, to creative
@jaztrophysicist@astrodon.social avatar
astro_jcm, to physics
@astro_jcm@mastodon.online avatar

Fun fact for

exist in a quantum superposition of two states: "pet me" and "how dare you touch me you hairless ape". It is only by touching them that their wave function collapses to one of these states.

pomarede, to modeltrains
@pomarede@mastodon.social avatar

Discovery alert!

A spherical shell-like structure 1 billion light-years in diameter named Ho’oleilana is discovered in the distribution of relatively nearby galaxies. We posit this is the 1st observation of an individual Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO).

https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aceaf3

'oleilana

RichiH, to physics
@RichiH@chaos.social avatar

I'm doing a thing!

j_bertolotti, to physics
@j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Haven't seen much discussion on the recent room-temperature superconductivity claims here on Mastodon (am I following the wrong people?), but before the hype hits you, here is the current state of affairs:

Until we have independent experimental replication, any hype is premature.

(h/t @dangaristo)

j_bertolotti, to physics
@j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyz avatar

There are many situations in the real world where small initial differences can easily grow into very large differences just out of pure chance.
Since we are on a social network, let's create a toy model* where a number of posts all have the same probability to be reposted/shared/boosted by any person seeing them. Since the more people see a post, the more people have a chance of boosting it, the posts with more visibility are also the ones that are likely to gain more visibility. So small initial fluctuations (just one or two extra boosts at the beginning) can lead a post to skyrocket in popularity, even though it is not intrinsically "better" than any of the other.
If we simulate this process numerically and make a histogram of the result, we see that the distribution of how many boosts a post had rapidly grows a tail, with most posts having no visibility whatsoever, and a few having a LOT more than the average.

  • In the jargon, a "toy model" is a very simple (often unrealistic) model, which nevertheless capture the essence of the problem, without being burdened by all the real world complications. If you ever heard about spherical cows in vacuum, that is a toy model!

Animated gif with two plots, side by side. On the left plot a large number of orange dots starts from the bottom, and gradually rise, with a few rising much faster than the other. On the right plot is a histogram of the data showed on the left, that starts as a narrow distribution and then expands into having a long tail.

chemoelectric, to physics
@chemoelectric@masto.ai avatar

Here is a second draft of the EPR-B simulation, with much important commentary about the result added:

https://pastebin.com/CA0UmnB8

I do not expect this simulation to change many minds. The Bohr cult is a cult. When it comes to quantum mechanics, supposed scientists are not scientists at all, but authoritarian cultists.

However, the truly interested may want to take a look at the program. It’s my best yet, for sure.

astro_jcm, to physics
@astro_jcm@mastodon.online avatar

Every. Single. Time.

chemoelectric, to physics
@chemoelectric@masto.ai avatar

Here is the first real draft of my new simulation of an EPR-B experiment:

https://pastebin.com/VHQ6fnGt

This version does NOT ‘swap channels’, as have my earlier versions, and therefore is unobjectionable in that regard.

(Channel-swapping is mathematically equivalent, ‘in the limit as n->infinity’. Nonetheless it did not give strictly correct statistics for the simulation. It gave merely a less accurate approximation.)

j_bertolotti, to physics
@j_bertolotti@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Just made this (as a variation on an old animation) for a talk, so why not show it here?
(hand-coded) finite element simulation of a pulse hitting a disordered medium and being scattered around.

A number of randomly arranged grey dots show where the scattering centres are. A green pulse of light arrives from the bottom, hits the scatterers, and is dispersed around.

jaztrophysicist, (edited ) to science French
@jaztrophysicist@astrodon.social avatar

"A brief history of time" by Stephen Hawking is probably the most influential semi-popular book ever written in , , , one that brought generations of students into these fields.

Do you know of any equivalent books in other fields of science, STEM or other ? Reply ⬇️

Boosting will make everybody on smarter !

gutenberg_org, to science
@gutenberg_org@mastodon.social avatar

Austrian Physicist Lise Meitner was born in 1878. She was the first to pinpoint the atomic phenomenon now known as the Auger effect, but it was credited to Pierre Auger who independently discovered it months after her. Years later when she made a breakthrough in identifying and understanding nuclear fission, her findings were published only under the name of her collaborator, Otto Hahn, who later also received the Nobel Prize for this discovery. via @IAEA

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • megavids
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines