phiofx,

@smallcircles @manlycoffee

It might be useful to define what different levels of interoperability mean as more diverse implementations with very different motivations and use cases enter the network (that can never fully interoperate and would not need or want it)

There is probably something like the "minimum" interoperability that is required and useful but this is not jumping at you from the specification. Maybe thats why conformance testing is still lacking?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fediverse
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • mdbf
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • thenastyranch
  • InstantRegret
  • khanakhh
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • cubers
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines