Bluesky sees record signups day after Musk says X will go paid-only

Just around 24 hours after Musk made his comments, more than 42,000 new users joined Bluesky, making it the biggest signup day yet for the currently invite-only platform that launched earlier this year.

Bluesky saw a total of 53,585 new signups by the end of Tuesday, September 19. The new users gained in that single day make up 5 percent of the platform's entire user base of 1,125,499 total accounts.

The new user signups are tracked via the third-party website "Bluesky Stats." Looking over Bluesky signup numbers on the tracker for the past month, it appears that the platform usually sees from 10,000 to 20,000 new signups per day. Bluesky has doubled its usual daily new user numbers already, with many more hours left in the day still to go.

It's impossible to know whether Musk's comments about charging users to post on X really played a role in this, but it almost certainly had some effect.

kilorat,
@kilorat@lemmy.world avatar

Excuse me, signups on an INVITE ONLY platform?

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

I have few invites if anyone needs

dm_me_your_feet,

I d like one if you can spare one

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-k4wtu-albgr

mana,

I’d like one if still available, please.

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-6yprh-qgtd3

HaggierRapscallier,

Would appreciate one :)

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-ylgua-e7m7l

HaggierRapscallier,

I think other miscreants have already swiped it :(

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

Did you check all 5

HaggierRapscallier,

Yes

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

Bad luck then

WillFord27,

Any chance you have any more? I’d love one

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-exmoh-54452

WillFord27,

Thank you!!

Decide,

If you still have any, I’d appreciate one.

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-f36an-iw7gb

Decide,

Thank you 🙏

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

Welcome

pakiyimo,

I could make use of one of those invites. Thank you.

Asuracharya,
@Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

bsky-social-ahf2c-hwzzy

pakiyimo,

Appreciate it, but you should have sent them by DM. It’s used by someone else now.

HaggierRapscallier,

Same here :(

thechadwick,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Asuracharya,
    @Asuracharya@lemmy.world avatar

    Dm me

    HelloHotel,
    @HelloHotel@lemmy.world avatar

    Ot makes no sense,

    flo24,

    isn’t bluesky invite only?

    PaulHulford,

    Each current member usually get at least one invite to share biweekly. That’s how they have been growing it.

    Tylerdurdon,

    So, in the shape of a pyramid? Sounds like a good business model. I wonder if anyone has ever done that before? (yes, it’s a joke)

    Natanael,

    Yup. I have a bunch of invites (for sane people only)

    WillFord27,

    I’d love an invite if it’s still available (:

    workerONE,

    I requested an invite a couple of months ago when I downloaded the app. Wish someone would invite me!

    Why9,

    Uhh… I can’t prove I’m sane, but a DM would be nice…!

    workerONE,

    This guy is crazy! Don’t listen to him!

    Why9,

    Welp. Was worth a shot…

    moitoi,

    If I could have one, I’m waiting for months now. :(

    Default,

    I would love one if you have a spare.

    NuttyChunks,
    @NuttyChunks@lemmy.world avatar

    I would love an invite if you have any left

    PlasterAnalyst,

    Google+ did the same thing when it rolled out, then they tried to force people to use it before they cancelled the project.

    kescusay,
    @kescusay@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m still salty about that. Google+ was fantastic on release. Simple, clean, elegant, and fast. Then they steadily, systematically fucked it up. By the time it was cancelled, it had become unusable.

    evatronic,

    G+'s downfall was they kept it invite-only too long. Demand was there, people wanted in but Google was like, “Nah…”

    By the time it was open-access, everyone had moved on or back to their old social media platforms. It could’ve been great, but Google, in typical Google fashion, got distracted by something shiny and killed it.

    wjrii,
    wjrii avatar

    The sad thing is, if they'd thought even a tiny bit laterally and leveraged the fact that Google Reader was getting a lot of traction and a core of people were beginning to use its social functions, they could have backdoored themselves into being Digg/Reddit/Etc. and had the social media userbase to take on Facebook organically.

    Instead, they fought the last war (Gmail vs Hotmail), intentionally eroded and then killed Reader, and with G+ they completely fucked up what was a cleaner interface (if not all that special) and a better technological experience, all while they were a brand that was at that time more trusted than their competitors.

    kescusay,
    @kescusay@lemmy.world avatar

    Yep. Once they screwed up G+, I committed to never becoming dependent on any Google service beyond Drive and Gmail, and only those two because they’re completely untouchable - Google couldn’t break those without having a mass rebellion on its hands.

    Doug,

    In fairness, Gmail had a similar invite system when it launched and that’s been way more successful than G+

    dual_sport_dork,
    @dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world avatar

    Gmail was invite only at first probably because Google didn’t want it to grow faster than they could buy hard drives. It gave you a gigabyte of email storage which at the time was huge. I’m certain they did that for technical reasons.

    0_0j,
    @0_0j@lemmy.world avatar

    “i am the choosen one!” As if…

    Boy, our servers are ducktaped!

    Doug,

    Might Bluesky be doing the same?

    GreenMario,

    Slow roll until the infrastructure can handle it and a little bit of that “exclusive” feel to it since not everyone can just join immediately.

    Doug,

    So more Gmail than G+

    Natanael,

    Yeah they’re working hard on scaling, they’ve had recurring performance issues but have managed to get it stable again even with higher load now

    geosoco,

    It's also easier to find and fix bugs with smaller numbers of people, especially performance bugs which can be amplified at scale. So it gives them a lot of time to work through issues over the beta. It also gives them time to build teams around the expanding infrastructure and build processes for monitoring and handling issues as a larger team.

    Plus, these invite only periods start with more tech savy early adopters who more willing to put up with issues, and willing to provide decent bug reports to fix them.

    KLISHDFSDF,
    @KLISHDFSDF@lemmy.ml avatar

    It gave you a gigabyte of email storage which at the time was huge.

    You’re right, but for those who may not know the details or the impact at the time, Google was offering 500x more storage - at the free tier - than some of the competition - hotmail - who were charging people for just 10 MB of storage. This forced hotmail to increase its free tier to 250 MB and 2 GB for customers paying $20 USD/year.

    Source: web.archive.org/…/hotmail-to-offer-250mb-of-free-…

    wjrii,
    wjrii avatar

    It's hard to explain what an absolute paradigm shift Gmail was. It was about as drastic a difference as you could have with personal email without altering the core service. Orders of magnitude more storage, completely free to the end user, a responsive and usable web interface, a single unobtrusive 1-line text ad when we were used to at least half a dozen that were often full-size banners or even popups, and a good search tool.

    My wife (then fiancee) got us invites, and it was like Christmas. And all from the company that was way less creepy than Microsoft! I'm sure that part would never change.

    wjrii,
    wjrii avatar

    Gmail was also both "federated" and an insanely good product compared to its contemporaries. G+ had a couple of interesting innovations, but it wasn't all that special and invite-only on a closed ecosystem is very iffy.

    Kalkaline,
    @Kalkaline@leminal.space avatar

    It was ad free which was amazing for a social media site at that time. No banners, no pop ups, just content.

    GreenMario,

    Gmail was literally the best. 1GB space at launch when you’d get a dozen MB in Hotmail and others, slick fast UI in a browser.

    SinningStromgald,

    And you got more space the longer you had the account! Then everyone got the same no matter what. I was sad to loose all that free space.

    supercheesecake,

    “Never delete an email”. Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    wjrii, (edited )
    wjrii avatar

    IIRC, that was rolled out as a surprise after a few years. People were just like, "WTF, my capacity is getting bigger?". For a while there, Goggle could do no wrong from a marketing standpoint. That, uhh, changed.

    dan,

    Hotmail was 2mb.

    Clent,

    Yes but I’m sure many recorded invites and didn’t bother. Musk musking TSFKAT ( the-site-formerly-known-as-twitter) was the needed motivation to accept it.

    ChucklesMacLeroy,

    I didn’t bother and was gonna give it a walk around. Downloaded but can’t access without an invite.

    beckerist,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Natanael,

    Xitter (pronounced shitter)

    Clent,

    I would prefer not to use the letter in any form.

    Fuck Ruskie Muskie

    geosoco,

    Yes, that's part of what's surprising about the number.

    ripcord,
    ripcord avatar

    It says that in the first sentence

    snowe,
    @snowe@programming.dev avatar

    lol they didn’t even bother reading the lemmy description. 😂

    LillyPip,

    I’ve been trying to get an invite since June.

    Apparently if you ask, you’re not good enough or some shit.

    cypher_greyhat,

    You’re not missing anything. I eventually got an invite, found that 40% of the content was furry and I deleted my account.

    nucleative,

    Invite only is a fascinating choice for a social network that requires network effect to succeed.

    Gmail is the most famous/successful example but interesting to note that email is a federated network that can interoperate with every other email address too.

    What about this bluesky network?

    ALostInquirer, (edited )

    Who is the target audience for BlueSky? BlueSky’s tech isn’t as open or developed as the alternatives though, is it?

    Edit:
    Not sure why I asked that first question, answer’s obvious, so it was more out of frustration I think. Sort of in a similar way towards people moving to Threads or any other corporate social media again after getting screwed before.

    funkless_eck,

    it’s invite only, which first makes you think, “oh cool - no spammers!”

    but then you realize you just need one spammer to get in and now they only invite spammers, and control their invites… as a form of spam! Flooding the net with “cheap” invite codes (only $10!) and multiplying.

    HelloHotel,
    @HelloHotel@lemmy.world avatar

    Invite only is a technique that becomes a hinderance and gimmic after about 100k members.

    ALostInquirer,

    Invite only makes people think no spammers? Have they never been in any space with minimal obstacles to entry like that? Any place people are, there’s going to be someone or some activity you don’t care for.

    Makes me think of folks thinking there will be fewer annoying people in online games with sub fees. 😂

    uglyduckling81,

    Seems pretty easy to control though.

    Once spammer is detected, you just ban them and the account that invited, all the way up a down that invite tree.

    Draconic_NEO,
    @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

    And in the process nuke every legitimate user who may have used their codes, great way to build trust in a new platform. You can’t even vet users to see if they are spammers or not because you need an account to view the service.

    HelloHotel,
    @HelloHotel@lemmy.world avatar

    Wellp, Nintendo intentionally breaks their own games if you pirate their stuff. Not allowing bribes is a simmlar looking situation. “This product is defective the last person who had their hands on it mustve screwed it up somehow.”

    TWeaK,

    Nintendo intentionally breaks their own games if you pirate their stuff.

    I’m not aware of them doing this all that often. In fact, it’s more something that game developers do from time to time, rather than Nintendo specifically. The classic one being when they introduce a bug that only affects the pirated release, then every time they get a report on that bug they know the user pirated their copy.

    Draconic_NEO,
    @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

    Yeah I’m not sure what exactly they’re referring to. if they’re referring to the N64 games that was the developer Rare who did it, not Nintendo, Nintendo is just the publisher. If it’s related to Switch games then it’s possible they’re referring to Online only games or the many many Piracy-related myths as well as disinformation that plagues the Switch Modding scene to this day.

    TWeaK,

    or the many many Piracy-related myths as well as disinformation that plagues the Switch Modding scene to this day.

    I mean I’ve been running a cracked Switch for years, and while my finger isn’t on the pulse entirely I’m not aware of any of this either. They definitely ban people (I’ve had one banned) but even then you can still use the device, just not online or in their store (as if you were in there much anyway).

    The bigger issue in the Switch modding scene is that half the developers are divas.

    Draconic_NEO,
    @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

    Some examples of the misinformation include:

    • banning preventing people from using Installed Software (one person actually referred to it as bricked)
    • Bans preventing use of Wifi hardware (FTP or Local play)
    • Banned Cartridges will get other Switches banned, or that cartridges are still getting banned

    Things like that are the most egregious ones.

    Lately though it’s mostly been what is ban worthy and what isn’t. For that there are two camps, there are the conspiracy minded, and there are the more reasonable people.

    For conspiracy theorists it’s as simple as plugging in RCM (or Booting from the Modchip if they have that instead) and booting into Stock, that’s enough for them to consider ban worthy. Some of them draw the line later at the actual firmware but the thing that these claims usually share is that they lack data backing them. It’s usually influencers who make these types of claims (hence why it’s become a cultural phenomenon, Yay 😒).


    The more reasonable ones group the actions that are and aren’t ban worthy through testing and historical evidence which is mainly:

    Guaranteed Ban:

    • Piracy
    • Custom NSPs
    • Cheating In Online games (includes save editing and some LayeredFS patches)
    • Log Tampering (Using an EmuMMC can cause mismatches if used online)
    • Account Tampering (custom PFP)
    • Hacking the servers (CDN abuse, bans both console and account)

    Things that don’t cause bans:

    • Booting Package3 (bootloader)
    • Booting into Atmosphere
    • Overclocking (is dangerous, but not ban worthy)
    • Homebrew games + Emulation using package Override (holding R when launching a title)

    Things still up for debate:

    • Use of themes
    • Use of NTP time changer
    • Cheating in Offline games

    (They also give methods for preventing bans, unlike the first kind of people like Using emuMMC to separate Identities, blocking Nintendo domains in the hosts file, and even using Incognito to erase the Identifier data.)


    Unfortunately Popular Culture tends to prefer the first type of person’s opinion so I’ve found that when discussing Homebrew with people outside of the community it can lead to some pretty nutty arguments, even going back to ones from before, such as banning cartridges.

    The bigger issue in the Switch modding scene is that half the developers are divas.

    That is very true, many of them are assholes, I visited GBAtemp’s politics section and was astonished to find out how many of them are Bigots, at least judging by the crap they spouted about “pronouns being forced” and “not wanting to call a man Ma’am” really disgusting shit that no respectable person should ever say. Nor should any forum ever put up with (basically GBAtemp is a Nazi bar).

    TWeaK,

    Some examples of the misinformation include:

    • banning preventing people from using Installed Software (one person actually referred to it as bricked)
    • Bans preventing use of Wifi hardware (FTP or Local play)
    • Banned Cartridges will get other Switches banned, or that cartridges are still getting banned

    Those all just seem like misunderstandings from users who aren’t tech savvy, coupled with a little bit of urban legend gossip.

    • It’s possible to brick your Switch in a handful of ways, but that doesn’t mean Nintendo did it.
    • Officially the wifi is only used to connect to Nintendo services, so a user might think that the wifi doesn’t work when Nintendo doesn’t work (because they’re banned).
    • Stories about dodgy cartridges have always been a thing.

    Unfortunately Popular Culture tends to prefer the first type of person’s opinion so I’ve found that when discussing Homebrew with people outside of the community

    Hah, yeah homebrew stuff isn’t generally meant for proper conversation. You’re either interested and ok with it, or you see it as just about piracy.

    Draconic_NEO,
    @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

    Yeah I think many of them serious misunderstandings by the people who posted the videos and articles, though also some of them seem to have been to cause fear since many of them tried to make it seem like they knew what they were talking about.

    I don’t think the ones who talked about systems being bricked actually knew what bricked means since they also said in the same breath “it can only play cartridges”, which isn’t what happens when bricked, in fact as I know from recovering a Switch with Prodinfo_gen that’s one of the things a previously bricked system likely can’t do if you had to generate a new prodinfo from scratch without a donor.

    I could normally forgive the wifi misconception normally, however in the case of the person who was talking about Wifi not working when banned they explicitly stated that Local play between Switches won’t work anymore, even when offline, which obviously isn’t correct.

    In the case of cartridge banning which was a thing it was always the cartridges themselves that were banned, but many news outlets both tried to frame it as if it was the user who would get their account banned, they also tried to make it seem like it’s an Ongoing issue and that it’s the end of used game sales.


    I agree that homebrew stuff isn’t really the best thing to talk about with most people who don’t understand it well enough, usually does come up though in discussions whenever I open my Home Screen since I do have custom Themes with Wildly different layouts that obviously aren’t stock (this is the one I’m using at the moment, but I have a few others I cycle through to keep things fresh).

    fosforus,

    Why would anyone think Bluesky is any better than Twitter? There are no fundamental differences.

    HKayn,
    @HKayn@dormi.zone avatar

    It’s not owned by Musk, which is what the average casual internet user is currently upset about with Twitter.

    geosoco,

    From a feature-functional perspective, sure, but it's not entirely true. The biggest differentiators for social media are rarely the core features, but the content and friends. There's a few specific groups that have slowly been migrating from Twitter and Mastodon there.

    There's a couple of very famous people that have moved over and because the audience is smaller, they tend to engage with people more often.

    Powerpoint,

    Less fascists for one

    Estiar,

    I mean, if Twitter X keeps changing like it is, there will be a whole bunch of differences

    DrVortex,

    You are right. In principle, the AT protocol is designed for federation. But at the moment, there is only one Bluesky instance that everyone is signing up on. This makes it effectively centralized like Twitter. It is mind-boggling that people are ignoring Mastodon for this.

    aceshigh,
    @aceshigh@lemmy.world avatar

    I wonder why people aren’t going for mastodon.

    Fedizen,

    different features and scalability

    theanon,

    When someone links me the backend code of mastodan I’ll join. Till then it’s just another Facebook. I’ll stick with my own website tiblur

    PlutoParty,

    Have you at all attempted to look? It’s open source.

    theanon,

    This is why it’s not being downloaded. It has terrible reviews it’s a 3.5 out of 5. You don’t think it but people care about that. https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0768eafb-989d-431d-8089-7ac8ba3d6a3f.png

    I have never tried Mastadon. Normally if a company is good it has great marketing as well as great direction, even if it’s a nonprofit. For instance, federation can never work for growth because it’s like operating a franchise. The owner of Mastadon doesn’t give his franchisees any cut. If he did they would bend over for him to grow their instance. It’s actually a new concept that is pretty smart but not executed well. Think I will copy it for Tiblur.com. Right now Mastodon is just a non profit version of McDonalds which all but ensures instance owners will lose their shirt if something bad happens on their instance and they are sued. Corporate structure is the only way. Just don’t build a shitty company. Also, why isn’t mastodon homie asking for peoples contacts, that’s how any app grows. You can do what FaceBook and Instagram do but just dont be a shit.

    PlutoParty,

    What is why it is not being “downloaded”? It seems you don’t actually understand how it works. You realize we are talking on a federated network right now, yeah? You must be trolling.

    theanon,

    Im on a computer not a phone. People like apps not browsers.

    theanon,

    Oh boy, I’m looking through the code for Mastodon right now. Already located one zero day after reading 300 lines of code. Who wrote this app…

    PlutoParty,

    Point it out and share it with everyone. That’s what FOSS is all about. I bet you won’t.

    theanon,

    What i don’t get about mastodon is that if the owner wants to pull the plug he can take away the app any time. What kind of tomfoolery is this. He can also legally sue instances he doesn’t like. how can you say mastodon is decentralized.

    PlutoParty,

    I’m not going to entertain your buffoonery.

    Little1Lost,

    but it is under the: GNU Affero General Public License v3.0Permissions of this strongest copyleft license are conditioned on making available complete source code of licensed works and modifications, which include larger works using a licensed work, under the same license. Copyright and license notices must be preserved. Contributors provide an express grant of patent rights. When a modified version is used to provide a service over a network, the complete source code of the modified version must be made available.

    So he cant revoke anyone of using the software he contributes

    Draconic_NEO,
    @Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world avatar

    It seems like you’re deliberately misrepresenting, but I’ll explain anyway because I know that some people might be confused.

    The Mastodon app is a client on your phone which accesses servers in the network.

    The network consists of multiple servers that are interconnected to each other. Content from one server is automatically cross-hosted to other servers when it is discovered on those other servers. That’s how Federation works. I know it’s probably an oversimplification of how activitypub works, but it’s generally good enough for most people, and the important part is really that content is present and visible on other servers.

    When you sign up to a server your account is stored on that server, the posts that you make are stored on that server, as well as automatically cross hosted to other servers which have people following you.

    If the owner of a server pulls the plug for whatever reason the content on that server will no longer be directly accessible, if your account is there you will lose your account. The copies on other servers will remain as they have been copied. The rest of the network will continue operating without that server and the accounts that were hosted on it.

    About asking whether or not an instance owner can sue instances they don’t like, that sounds like absolute nonsense and I’m not even going to bother trying to understand whatever point you’re trying to make with this.

    seitanic,

    Of course they won’t. They’re shilling their own product which is a competitor to Mastodon.

    theanon,

    It’s on the android store I’m looking at the reviews right now.

    Schadrach,

    Since you appear to be talking about a Mastodon mobile app and not the Mastodon network a fair bit of negative reviews are about many of the mobile apps blocking access to Gab. Gab switched to a Mastodon back end back in 2019 or so and several of the apps started to blacklist using that instance at the app level as a consequence. Usually negative reviews about that will refer to “the largest Mastodon instance”, which Gab actually was by sheer numbers.

    There was even an issue request to hardcode blacklisting Gab into the backend, though they were basically told no in no uncertain terms.

    OsrsNeedsF2P,
    mint_tamas,
    Fumbles,

    Congratulations of joining mastodon today. 😆

    theanon,

    I’ll stick with Tiblur but the UI on this is decent.

    pomodoro_longbreak, (edited )
    @pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works avatar

    Not only is it open, but you can check it out yourself and install right from source if you really want to get under the hood.

    I’ve seen folks out there running a 1-person masto instance, just so they can partake in the fedi from their own fully sovereign platform. Bit extreme for me, but cool that it’s an option. Definitely not just another FB in other words

    EDIT: Oh dang there’s a one-click app on DO even.

    Bongles,

    I’m on there, but I use Twitter and mastodon as a follower, I don’t post. So until most of the 40ish people I follow move I’m stuck with Twitter if I want to see their posts. And I do.

    Albatross2724,

    depending on how popular the user is on Twitter, you may be able to follow them on Mastodon via bird.makeup. I use it to follow things like larger content creators, NHL teams, stuff like that.

    Bongles,

    Oh interesting. I was unaware.

    paris,
    Asudox,
    @Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

    Was a open source platform run on donations entirely ever be a competition for something huge like Twitter? This is a first afaik.

    locuester,

    I’d say Bitcoin is a bigger example.

    Asudox,
    @Asudox@lemmy.world avatar

    yeah but like yesn’t. bitcoin isn’t a good example imo

    locuester, (edited )

    How so? A decentralized open source platform with no owner which has a 500B market cap and 220 millions users.

    I feel like that’s exactly what we are talking about. I understand the negative sentiment over crypto, but this is a fact.

    Or maybe the difference is that it hasn’t stifled some competitor platform yet. I can agree with that because it’s not a parallel in that it’s competing with nothing.

    jasory,

    Do people either make money or think they’ll make money simply by using the Fediverse? One can certainly advertise via guerrilla marketing on a Fediverse platform but it’s far more lucrative to advertise on mainstream social media.

    Rambi,

    Are you saying brands don’t want to come to the fediverse to market their products? I mean if that’s true that seems like a good thing, and even if it wasn’t I’m sure they would once Lemmy/Mastadon are big enough

    jasory,

    No I’m pointing out why the comparison to Bitcoin is inaccurate. It’s like saying that your open-source software project will work because the Linux kernel worked. The sole point of similarity has little relevance.

    The Fediverse isn’t asset speculation, Bitcoin is.

    joenforcer,

    The same reason people aren’t going for Lemmy.

    Aside from the fact that the Fediverse is an incredibly confusing concept to the average user, those same users are entrenched and connected to everyone they already want to be connected to on the same platform. Until they are essentially forced to move, they’ll stay on Twitter. The people on Lemmy and Mastodon right now are a tiny but vocal minority compared to the massive userbases of the platforms they abandoned.

    seitanic,

    Aside from the fact that the Fediverse is an incredibly confusing concept to the average user

    How did the average user ever figure out email?

    Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow,

    Yeah there really needs to be a rethink of how the Fediverse works.

    I don’t want to have to subscribe to 8 different “Games” subs each with under 3000 users.

    It really should be like “topics” more than “sublemmys” (or whatever) where every post on the Fediverse tagged “games” will appear on your feed when you subscribe to the topic.

    The topics still get moderated by the local instance topic moderators and instances can defederate from troubled instances, but discoverability would improve exponentially.

    Rambi,

    Maybe how it could work is sublemmies could agree to link up and share posts so for example the posts from one games sub would appear in the other games sub and vice versa.

    It seems the limitation with the topics idea is who would decide what the topics are? Would there just be a list of like 20 topics baked into Lemmy and people that create sublemmies would tag their sub with a topic? I think the only limitation with that is there would be so many niche subs that don’t fit cleanly into one topic, or will be drowned out by the big subs in there maybe. Maybe it could work though if anybody could create new topics, then there could be a Fallout for example with the Fallout subs being in that rather than having to be in the games topic and being drowned out

    Krauerking,

    Yeah it sorta needs to be back to hashtags to tag content so that it can all be in a community despite being in different instances and subs. It’s really disjointed and currently the fediverse feels like we went back to AOL chat rooms where it’s a lot of people waiting in their own room for someone to come in and talk to them.

    It doesn’t work and it doesn’t really inspire conversation anymore.

    Rambi,

    Yeah it is like that unfortunately. I mean the larger subs are fine but the niche ones just aren’t working on Lemmy atm and some way of addressing the sub splintering would help a lot. And yeah hashtags would probably be a solid way of addressing it.

    TheSaneWriter,
    @TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com avatar

    Mastadon (and the Fediverse in general, to some extent) has problems with discoverability and the average user finds federation confusing. People tend to either use microblogging to see what’s going on with people they’re interested in or to broadcast their activities to a large group of people, and Mastadon currently doesn’t fit that niche very well.

    decadentrebel,
    @decadentrebel@lemmy.world avatar

    Pretty much this. It’s why I love it for my use case (microblogging journal that only I can see), but it’s definitely not for everyone else.

    It’s why if your average influencer or news consumer wants a Twitter alternative, it’s likely Threads or perhaps BlueSky, not Mastodon.

    Smacks,
    @Smacks@lemmy.world avatar

    God I hope he gets gaslit into actually making Twitter a subscription. It would be so funny

    BallsInTheShredder,

    I’m starting to suspect he only wanted Twitter to kill it…

    Rambi,

    It is weird how he’s just completely running it into the ground… I don’t really buy that though because he never actuslly wanted the company and only bought it because a court forced him to. Also I honestly don’t think he’d want to wash 44 big ones down the drain just to own the libs.

    All I can think of is that he’s just… maybe kind of an idiot and has just gotten lucky so far lol? It’s the only thing that fits as far as I can see.

    Gullible,

    Some have suggested that the purchase was partly to prevent a second Arab spring. Saudi funding and increased cooperation make it a possibility but I’m not sold on any particular idea besides “avoid everything Elon touches.” Why anyone stayed on ragebait bot network: the website is beyond my understanding.

    Kevnyon,
    @Kevnyon@lemmy.world avatar

    Really liking Bluesky so far, hope it picks up some steam soon. It really is something special and way less confusing (at least for me) than Mastodon.

    E: But to add, let’s face it, no decentralized platform will ever replace a centralized one unless something major happens. I just don’t see the mainstream adopting Bluesky/Mastodon/Nostr unless something incredibly drastic happens. As much as I’d love for Bluesky to get some more steam, it won’t at this rate. People want to get on it, but can’t.

    PetteriSkaffari,

    What’s confusing about Mastodon? Just join a random server and you can find everyone else on any other server. (Or are these called ‘instances’? I don’t know or care, fact is it works without problems.)

    nl4real,

    Yeah, I suspected this would be a real point of no return. Mastodon will also benefit, but naturally the fediverse isn’t the first thing people think of. Fortunately, Mastodon has been working on this.

    Raglesnarf,

    what the fuck is Bluesky

    mr_tyler_durden,

    It’s Jack Dorsey’s “Twitter but federated this time”, except there is only 1 instance, run by Jack…. But don’t worry, “Trust me bro” it will totally be federated/open.

    Maybe it will be but until it is it’s just as bad as Twitter.

    Rambi,

    So is it going to be part of the fediverse at one point or will it be a separate federation?

    TWeaK,

    That hasn’t been specified, which suggests they’re aiming for the latter.

    amycatgirl,

    separate federation, they use their own home-grown protocol called ATProto

    Rambi,

    Ahh as an alternative to Activity Pub or whatever it’s called? That’s a shame

    amycatgirl,

    Ahh as an alternative to Activity Pub or whatever it’s called?

    Seems like it

    BallsInTheShredder,

    God… I’ve been on the “fediverse” for months and

    A: have no clue what it is

    And

    B: am not even entirely sure I’m on it anymore

    Love Lemmy but lol this is getting confusing, is Mastodon on Lemmy or… just federated or… sheesh I need to search this

    jana,

    The fediverse is basically anything that uses some means of connecting to other sites. A lot of them now use ActivityPub, a standard for this kind of thing.

    Mastodon isn’t “on” Lemmy, but they can communicate with each other

    geosoco,

    It doesn't really matter. If you find value in using it, just keep using it.

    some_guy,

    Maybe they just don’t have the infra (and if they still don’t, I don’t believe they ever will). Turn off invites and make it open-season or shut the whole thing down. It’s not a competitor like this.

    LufyCZ,

    Scaling is hard. You need time for hard things

    NutWrench,
    @NutWrench@lemmy.ml avatar

    Switch to Mastodon. It’s a great alternative.

    shaolin_shrimp,

    Not sure if I’m getting suckered into conspiracy theories with regards to Elon, the Saudis, Russia and Twitter but this article has an interesting (albeit extreme) take on the matter.

    “No, Elon and Jack are not “competitors.” They’re collaborating.”

    …medium.com/no-elon-and-jack-are-not-competitors-…

    Omega_Haxors,

    Medium is a bad source but there’s truth that Bluesky’s CEO is a musk toesucker.

    AfricanExpansionist,

    Underrated link

    Grant_M,
    @Grant_M@lemmy.ca avatar

    100% - Allied partners.

    couragethebravedog,

    Nostr is the easiest to use decentralized Twitter alternative I’ve came across.

    TWeaK,

    Bluesky, the “decentralized” X-alternative social media platform

    “The” alternative platform?? Shots fired.

    atyaz,

    Serious question, why would you consider Bluesky? I would argue that mastodon is “the” decentralized social media platform, I mean it’s not owned by some billionaire; and if you mostly care about audience size, nothing beats twitter. I’ve never felt any inclination to try bluesky for these reasons.

    BonesOfTheMoon,

    I like Firefish way better. It has great design and is very positive.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • InstantRegret
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • love
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • mdbf
  • tester
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • megavids
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines