pitrh, to random
@pitrh@mastodon.social avatar

PROTIP: If you run a "cloud mapping experiment", make sure the contact address you give is deliverable -

2a05:d01c:b43:8a10:36c:5dc5:25e5:de22 - - [07/Feb/2024:18:06:02 +0100] "\x16\x03\x01\x00\xB1\x01\x00\x00\xAD\x03\x03\x9C\xB9\x0F\x1FW`\xF4\xAE\x01\xC5\xAC\x12\xDF9\xC2\xA0\x16\x9B\xBCl\xDE\xFFj4e>Z\x11\x17~g#\x00\x00P\xC0/\xC0+\xC0\x11\xC0\x07\xC0\x13\xC0\x09\xC0\x14\xC0" 400 150 "-" "-"
2a05:d01c:b43:8a10:36c:5dc5:25e5:de22 - -
1/2

pitrh,
@pitrh@mastodon.social avatar

[07/Feb/2024:18:09:02 +0100] "GET /manage/account/login HTTP/1.1" 301 162 "-" "'Cloud mapping experiment. Contact research@pdrlabs.net'"

And certainly when you also throw binary junk at webservers and grope "login" URLs. 2/2

Frau_Mensch, to random German
@Frau_Mensch@troet.cafe avatar
c_th1, to email German
@c_th1@digitalcourage.social avatar
themroc, to random German

Eine Infoseite der CCC-Haecksen zum Schutz vor (nicht nur) für Frauen, auf die @anneroth gestern in ihrem Vortrag hinwies, hat viel (mehr) Beachtung verdient: https://antistalking.haecksen.org

itnewsbot, to medical
@itnewsbot@schleuss.online avatar

Apple AirTags stalking led to ruin and murders, lawsuit says - Enlarge (credit: BackyardProduction | iStock Editorial / Getty Images P... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1975778

haecksen, to random German
@haecksen@chaos.social avatar

📻
Hier ist eine neue Folge - und zwar mit einem extrem informativen Talk von wifi-cable zum Thema und dem Antistalking Projekt einer engagierten Gruppe der .

https://www.haecksen.org/uncategorized/hckn017-haecksen-gegen-cyberstalking

simsus, to random German
@simsus@social.tchncs.de avatar
spocko, to Facebook
@spocko@mastodon.online avatar

Lisa Graves on the Supreme Court's opinion on the Counterman V Colorado case.

"The American people need to have 21st century rules to deal with 21st century cyberstalking, stalking, harassment and that type of threat. This is not about core 1st Amendment rights. People don't have the right to harass other people and threaten them."

@nicolesandler

Lisa Graves talks to Nicole Sandler on the Supreme Court's opinion on the Counterman V Colorado case. "American people need to have 21st century rules to deal with 21st century cyberstalking, stalking, harassment and that type of threat. This is not about core 1st Amendment rights. People don't have the right to harass other people and threaten them."

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

6-28-23 Nicole Sandler Show – Lisa Graves Explains the SCOTUS Rulings
View on Zencastr

Lisa Graves, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General under both Bill Clinton/Janet Reno and George W Bush/John Ashcroft and a veteran of a few other similarly impressive high level legal positions, joins us regularly to help us understand issues related to t
https://nicolesandler.com/6-28-23/

spocko,
@spocko@mastodon.online avatar

@GottaLaff Lisa Graves on the Supreme Court's opinion on the Counterman V Colorado case.

"American people need to have 21st century rules to deal with 21st century cyberstalking, stalking, harassment and that type of threat. This is not about core 1st Amendment rights. People don't have the right to harass other people and threaten them."

Part 2
Whole clip https://youtu.be/wxylvu3bamo here

Lisa Graves talks to Nicole Sandler about the Supreme Court's opinion on the Counterman V Colorado case

itnewsbot, to FreeSpeech
@itnewsbot@schleuss.online avatar

Cyberstalkers shielded by SCOTUS ruling on speech and online threats - Enlarge (credit: Bloomberg Creative | Bloomberg Creative Photos)

... - https://arstechnica.com/?p=1950612

SashaRomanosky, to random

One lesson I learned early on was that research is nonlinear in time. Periods of (seeming) no progress, then spurts of output. To wit: I have four papers out this year. Let me tell you about them.

  1. First, I completed a multi-year research effort under a National Institute of Justice grant to examine . We produced 2 papers, one based on interviews with prosecutors and law enforcement that describes the challenges they face when processing the cases, and another paper showing empirical results.

From the first paper, we find that: 1) cyberstalking threats no longer about “stranger danger.” We need to develop better red flags to identify potentially threatening online behaviors. 2) we need to remove the “intent to harm” element from the cyberstalking statute because of harms that occur even absent intent. 3) criminal justice providers need better training to hell and manage victims. The paper is in press and available soon.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • JUstTest
  • everett
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • cubers
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines