GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Yet another revelation....

Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice , made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show

At least one of those firms argued a case before Chief Justice Roberts after paying his wife hundreds of thousands of dollars.

https://www.businessinsider.com/jane-roberts-chief-justice-wife-10-million-commissions-2023-4

Nonilex, to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

is “…far behind in issuing rulings for cases heard since the start of the term in Oct. The has announced just 5 decisions, leaving 92% of cases to be resolved b4 the term ends in late Jun or early Jul.

“…the court’s backlog represents the slowest pace of any term in the tenure of CJ . By Mar1 of the ‘05 term, the court had issued rulings in >⅓ of its cases. That dropped to 21% by this point in the ‘20 term. This yr, it is at 8%.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/03/supreme-court-trump-history-backlog/

schizanon, to random
@schizanon@mas.to avatar
DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

Sam Alito has no business holding any office in American government.

Justice Alito Caught with Another Flag Linked to Jan. 6 After Defending Upside-Down U.S. Flag https://www.mediaite.com/politics/justice-alito-caught-with-another-flag-linked-to-jan-6-after-defending-upside-down-u-s-flag/

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"You knew it was going to be him, didn’t you? To write yet another Supreme Court decision basically saying, this whole race thing – we’re finished with it, and racism is over."

~ Lucian K. Truscott


/1

https://luciantruscott.substack.com/p/chief-justice-roberts-is-a-liar-and

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

Wendell Griffen on why he opposed George W. Bush's nomination of John Roberts to the Supreme Court: Roberts has consistently used his to advance intelligence and legal acumen "to advance interests and positions that maintained bigotry, discrimination, and disregard for unprivileged persons."

Wendell writes,

"Like Roger Taney did in 1857, John Roberts uses judicial power now to uphold bigotry, supremacy, and privilege."


/1

https://fierceprohetichope.blogspot.com/2023/07/i-opposed-john-roberts-because-i.html

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

A case on the Court’s “shadow docket” could strike down state and local bans on AR-15s and similar weapons.

A new Supreme Court case seeks to legalize assault weapons in all 50 states https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/5/9/23716863/supreme-court-assault-rifles-weapons-national-association-gun-rights-naperville-brett-kavanaugh

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

Overwhelm the Supreme Court with postal mail expressing your concerns and disgust!

Public Information Officer
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, DC 20543

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar
DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

John Roberts has told us not to worry our pretty little heads about ethics and the Supreme Court.

dougiec3, to Ethics
@dougiec3@libretooth.gr avatar

“I am in shock that a lawyer stood in the U.S. Supreme Court and said that a president could assassinate his political opponent and it would be immune as ‘an official act,’”
The trouble SCOTUS is having with this is that many of them are Joe Biden's political opponents.
https://open.substack.com/pub/heathercoxrichardson/p/april-25-2024?r=63j6s&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

wdlindsy, to Ethics
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"The Supreme Court’s new ethics code is a joke The code is so weak that it serves to legitimize Clarence Thomas’s corruption. It is literally worse than nothing."

~ Ian Milhiser

https://www.vox.com/scotus/2023/11/14/23960027/supreme-court-new-ethics-code-clarence-thomas-unenforceable

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"Among the most notable new features of Chief Justice John Roberts’s Court is a willingness to insert itself into matters traditionally reserved to the legislative or executive branches, substituting its own judgment for that of Congress or federal agencies.

This is a particularly troubling development for any democracy."

~ Jay Kuo


/1

https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/unrestrained

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

Thanks for putting a bow on it, Clarence!

Clarence Thomas’ Latest Pay-to-Play Scandal Finally Connects All the Dots https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/09/clarence-thomas-chevron-ethics-kochs.html?via=rss

wdlindsy, to Ethics
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"Yesterday, the Supreme Court announced an ethics code for the justices. But the code is utterly empty. It has no enforcement mechanism and no mechanism for the public to lodge complaints of misconduct.

It’s public relations pablum.

The court effectively admitted this…."

~ Robert Reich


/1

https://robertreich.substack.com/p/why-the-supreme-courts-new-ethics

dougiec3, to random
@dougiec3@libretooth.gr avatar

SCOTUS dragging out a decision on T****'s immunity just may be because it could cost certain justices and their wives hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.
Another consideration is the justices' concern for their own safety after the reaction to the Dobbs decision. No justices were harmed at all, only fearful.
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2024/apr/12/billionaire-leonard-leo-rejects-senate-subpoena-supreme-court-gifts

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

As Jonathan Weiler says, "[F]rom his early days on the Court, [John] Roberts has been arguing that efforts to achieve greater racial balance in society are either themselves a form of discrimination or have passed their expiration date, or both."

This is a life mission for John Roberts, to gut civil rights legislation and initiatives.

At what point, one wonders, did Mr. Roberts realize he had been given this mission?


/1

https://jonathanweiler.substack.com/p/affirmative-action-follow-up

dougiec3, to random
@dougiec3@libretooth.gr avatar

Judge cleared of making her views clear during campaign instead of lying like some Supreme Court justice or other.
https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-supreme-court-impeach-865fadb85762b0039490f218da3b8db8

br00t4c, to Fox
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

SCOTUS dragging their feet on a decision about Trump’s ludicrous immunity claim is a stain on the court that cannot be washed out. It will be written and talked about for centuries to come. Shame on John Roberts and the Right-wing justices.

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

Eric Segall warns that with the current Supreme Court, there's a constitutional apocalypse on the horizon:

"Since Justice Kennedy retired and Justice Ginsburg passed away, the Roberts Court has been on a conservative rampage, overturning Roe, turning the Second Amendment into a super-charged destroyer of reasonable gun reform," (continued in /2)

#SupremeCourt #corruption #democracy #FederalistSociety #JohnRoberts #ClarenceThomas #Alito
/1

https://www.dorfonlaw.org/2024/03/judicial-review-supreme-court-and.html

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar
wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"Chief Justice John Roberts got the chance to complete the Day of Jubilee he declared in Shelby County. The 14th Amendment is now magically and completely converted into a vehicle for white victimhood. Justice Clarence Thomas gets to take his twisted self-loathing out for another walk. And affirmative action is now as dead as Roger Taney because, you know, colorblind."

~ Charles Pierce


/1

https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a44389914/supreme-court-decision-ends-affirmative-action/

wdlindsy, to Ethics
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"The larger story of this term has been one of ethical rot and official indifference. … Whatever Chief Justice Roberts thinks of their behavior, it is plain that judicial independence on his court has come to mean judicial license: a freedom to do and say what a justice pleases."

~ Jeff Shesol


/1

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/03/opinion/john-roberts-supreme-court.html

DemocracyMattersALot, to random
@DemocracyMattersALot@mstdn.social avatar

The court is fundamentally antidemocratic—and the only way to limit the damage it can do is to reduce its power, budget, and lack of accountability.

The Supreme Court Must Be Stopped 01-MAR-2024 https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/the-supreme-court-must-be-stopped/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tester
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • modclub
  • GTA5RPClips
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • JUstTest
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • lostlight
  • All magazines