iuculano, to worldnews
@iuculano@masto.ai avatar

Via #GlobalNews

Business groups are warning #Finance Minister #ChrystiaFreeland that increasing #Canada’s #CapitalGains inclusion rate will have “significant knock-on impacts” if implemented with possible “irreversible repercussions.”

Six of the country’s largest industry organizations wrote in an open letter to Freeland Thursday that the proposed hike will impede economic growth and come at the expense of future generations.

https://globalnews.ca/news/10485332/business-concerns-capital-gains-changes-freeland-letter/

marcia, to random
@marcia@spore.social avatar

Are there any folks connected to the science and tech sector who've publicly refused to sign this letter opposing increases to taxes? Or maybe there's another open letter circulating that supports capital gains or wealth taxes?

It's disappointing to see folks from Abcellera sign the letter, but fortunately I didn't see many other orgs from the biotech industry.

https://www.prosperityforeverygeneration.ca

mpjgregoire, (edited ) to random
@mpjgregoire@cosocial.ca avatar

"If the result of this budget is a fight on capital gains instead of a fight on the carbon tax, that'll be a political win for the Liberals."

https://twitter.com/calgarygrit/status/1780334070976708745

1/2

mpjgregoire,
@mpjgregoire@cosocial.ca avatar

Here's my real opinion on the increase in the inclusion rate in the recent federal budget: I don't think it was based on a belief it was necessary for "fairness". I don't even think it was based on a belief the gov't needs more revenue [0]. I think the just wanted a symbol, something they can point at to claim that they are against the rich and for the middle class.

[0] The amount it will raise is not high, and PM Trudeau is unfazed by deficits.

2/2

GarlicBreath, to random
@GarlicBreath@blackrocks.social avatar

I don’t know, the more I read about this outrage the more it sounds mostly like moderately wealthy people don’t want to pay taxes on selling their second homes and corporations are, once again, throwing around empty threats of leaving Canada. I’m unsympathetic to these complaints.

https://www.thestar.com/politics/federal/heres-why-justin-trudeaus-changes-to-the-capital-gains-tax-are-making-some-canadians-furious/article_9fcd05d2-fdb8-11ee-8731-931ee5e49e8b.html

voron, to geopolitics
@voron@mstdn.party avatar

Probably time to the hell out of the rich. Increase put a tax on make a real etc
👇
“The economy is cooling but the US is a frog in hot water

Government debt held by the public grows from 99 percent of GDP this year to 116 percent in 2034, more than twice its 50-year average...”

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/4472654-the-economy-is-cooling-but-the-us-is-a-frog-in-hot-water/?utm_source=press.coop

RememberUsAlways, to btc
@RememberUsAlways@newsie.social avatar

yields the greatest market returns of all assets classes in 2023.

If you were loud and proud on investing in you could have made an easy in

If you were bashing , you missed the boat.

dcjohnson, to random
@dcjohnson@mastodon.cloud avatar

The reason the rich get most of their income from capital gains is that the capital gains tax is lower.

The reason the capital gains tax is lower is because the rich get most of their income from capital gains.

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
daveystew, to random
@daveystew@mstdn.social avatar

Is your salary less than $160,200?
If so, you’re among the 94 percent of American workers who pay into Social Security all year long. Thanks to a loophole that exclusively benefits the affluent, income above that amount simply isn’t taxed for Social Security.

That means someone like Tucker Carlson, who makes a reported $8 million a year, stopped contributing to Social Security on Jan. 8. Joe Rogan, who reportedly makes $4 million a month, stopped contributing on Jan. 2.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@daveystew capping maximum pay to social security and similar services doesn't make sense at all...

Because it's even less justifyable than the fact that is taxed higher than ...

georgetakei, to random

It’s always the interns and assistants, isn’t it? One of Trump's aides, Molly Michael, has told federal investigators that the former president wrote notes and "to-do" lists on the back of classified documents, including documents used to brief him on calls with foreign leaders or other international matters.

And when Trump heard the FBI wanted to interview Michael last year, Trump allegedly told her, "You don't know anything about the boxes."

Nothing suspicious at all about that, right?

I wonder if she’ll be called to testify by Jack Smith down in Florida.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@opendna @georgetakei even then six figures doesn't compensate for self-induced unemployability as that's not even close to live off aka. ...

And having even a single box to tick ona Form 4473 is making people mostly illegible to applybfor most jobs in the USA...

So OFC they'll gonna take any deal...

LadyDragonfly, to random

In 2021, Washington State passed a 7% capital gains tax on the rich.

To date, that tax has raised over $850 million dollars — three times what it was supposed to.

Amazon is still here.
Microsoft is still here.
Boeing is still here.

The wealthy are doing just fine. Anyone who tells you we can't tax "job creators" is lying to you.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.king5.com/amp/article/money/washingtons-capital-gains-tax/281-3fe9d8c3-7f89-46a5-ae91-e148a7f31c72

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@LadyDragonfly IMHO should be taxed like / if not higher and be subject to the same fees and surcharges...

Anything else would be unfair to the masses of people working.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB1FXvYvcaI

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@LadyDragonfly nodds in agreement

It's also how -based systems work, cuz there's no guarantee any of the won't become cases for or otherwise incapable of making a living with their .

Not that I wish anyone something bad - far from it - but what if Musk gets hit by a car or Buffet has a Stroke??

QasimRashid, to random
@QasimRashid@mastodon.social avatar

EIon Musk’s Wealth
2009: $.6B
2023: $249B

Jeff Bezos’s Wealth
2009: $6B
2023: $153B

Mark Zuckerberg’s Wealth
2009: $.6B
2023: $105B

Federal Minimum Wage
2009: $7.25
2023: $7.25

Billionaire tax rate: 8.2%
Worker tax rate: 13%

Pay workers.
Tax Billionaires.
Save our economy.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@QasimRashid should be taxed at least higher if not equal than and also be subject to the same percentage of deductions like and ...

unattributed, to random

Italian Parliament Approves 26% -Gains in 2023 Budget

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2022/12/30/italian-parliament-approves-26-crypto-gains-tax-under-2023-budget/

So, are subject to taxation, in the same way as stock investment. This is quite different from the tax paid for savings or your work income.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • anitta
  • slotface
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • osvaldo12
  • Durango
  • khanakhh
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cubers
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines