@alxd@writing.exchange
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

alxd

@alxd@writing.exchange

Programmer, hacker, #solarpunk, educator, activist and a wannabe writer fascinated by how technology is portrayed in culture - and how that affects human lives.

Co-author of https://podcast.tomasino.org/@SolarpunkPrompts #podcast , exploring realistic stories of our climate future with all their traumas and hopes.

Languages: ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡บ ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ฑ

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

alxd, to writing
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

mastodon, could you recommend any good resources on organizing a , especially in context of optimal text length / jury size / time?

I was asked for advice on organizing a contest in focusing on and its communal / societal impact.

alxd, to solarpunk
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

In the recently resurfaced debate about (or lunarpunk) aspects of and I'm intrigued by one aspect:

Why do we accept being given a solution without outlining the problem in the first place?

Why don't we listen to pitches instead of asking ourselves how we want to run our communities, how do we want to make decisions, vote, discuss things?

Just stating the problem first would make it very clear that there are multiple technical solutions, not just the Web3.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Every time I encountered someone pitching a DAO or a Blockchain to an organization, they specifically bundled several things together to make them indistinguishable - the culture with the technology, the way a community is organized with the tools they use. With that, there fewer footholds for any kind of question, insight into what is really happening.

This is what I mean by saying that the technology is transparent and it's not always a good thing, because it makes us unable to discuss it.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

In my definition of in I do call it the "crystallized community", as a sum of all the decisions, tradition, culture, because the tools arise from the needs and the conscious choice, not the other way around.

Blockchain and DAOs are an anti-thesis of Solarpunk not just because of their carbon footprint, but because they bundle everything together and make choices for you, pretending there was never a choice in how your community could operate.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Moreover, Blockchains, with their tokens, enforce financialization of your communities, where the way ledger is implemented does not correspond with any kind of gift economy, with communalism, but with the harshest capitalist market traditions. Whoever has the [money/tokens/votes], rules.

We spent thousands of years working on different law systems, putting transparency, equality before the law at their core, and Blockchain wants to replace them with a web3 engineer being a priest/judge.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

There's a reason why paper ballots are considered safer than electronic elections: they can be audited, counted by people without extremely specialized skills. You can train someone to count votes in a few days instead of a few years of intense P2P cybersecurity courses, software and hardware expertise.

What Blockchain and DAOs offer you is offloading the responsibility for your processes to a third party, making you forget that you're giving them enough power to become absolute rulers.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

And for every. single. argument. for Blockchains, DAOs, Web3, there is another open source tool that does the same thing, but better, less energy-intensely, with more fine-tuning for your own needs.

You can dive into IPFS, DAT, Scuttlebutt, Git and GitTorrent, dozens and dozens protocols which can solve your problems.

But none of them come in a sleek, well-marketed package of "solving all of your problems" only a scammer can offer you.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Many web3 and DAO advocates will call for a debate, saying that you cannot just dismiss their solutions like a religious zealot. Then they start looking for an edge: are you non-technical enough to be convinced that >this< technology is so far outside of your understanding to solve all of your problems? Are you optimistic enough to be sold on the idea of an Objective Machine which will solve human imperfections?

Then they will use those lines, like good salesmen, completely ignoring your needs.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

If I could ask the community for one thing regarding the web3, blockchains and DAOs, it will be:

Do not treat them like a technology you just dont understand.

Treat them like a way of thinking which dismisses your and your organization's needs and gives you a sleek solution, asking not to ask too many questions.

Because that's what web3 is: the culture of techno-solutionism, of abandoning hard questions about humanity and community organization.

The exact anti-thesis of Solarpunk.

alxd, to architecture
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

A dear friend of mine, an student actively interested in and is currently visiting .

Is there anything you could recommend for him to see, any place to visit, people to meet? Do you know anyone from who could show him how the network works?

He might not be into software or hardware enough to appreciate cBase, he is more interested in city scale transport systems, urban planning and so on.

rysiek, to random
@rysiek@mstdn.social avatar

A few days ago @ward tooted about how it's somehow "AI art", but if it's human-made, inexplicably it's just "content":
https://easymode.im/notes/9s9fhdg8jh3gi3h7

His toot has been living rent-free in my head ever since.

I had ranted a few times before how "content" is a corporate-y way to devalue art. How "user-generated content" is a term designed to make it easier to deny the significance (not just monetary) of the amazing stuff people create online.

Contrasting this with "AI art" is jarring, and spot-on. ๐Ÿ‘€

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

@rysiek @ward capitalism corrupts language like this.

To the point of some languages (not only Polish) missing "sustainability", only having "a balanced growth". Because you cannot not grow.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • โ€ข
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • everett
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • mdbf
  • modclub
  • Durango
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines