Posts

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

alxd, to writing
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

mastodon, could you recommend any good resources on organizing a , especially in context of optimal text length / jury size / time?

I was asked for advice on organizing a contest in focusing on and its communal / societal impact.

alxd, to solarpunk
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

In the recently resurfaced debate about (or lunarpunk) aspects of and I'm intrigued by one aspect:

Why do we accept being given a solution without outlining the problem in the first place?

Why don't we listen to pitches instead of asking ourselves how we want to run our communities, how do we want to make decisions, vote, discuss things?

Just stating the problem first would make it very clear that there are multiple technical solutions, not just the Web3.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

And for every. single. argument. for Blockchains, DAOs, Web3, there is another open source tool that does the same thing, but better, less energy-intensely, with more fine-tuning for your own needs.

You can dive into IPFS, DAT, Scuttlebutt, Git and GitTorrent, dozens and dozens protocols which can solve your problems.

But none of them come in a sleek, well-marketed package of "solving all of your problems" only a scammer can offer you.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

If I could ask the community for one thing regarding the web3, blockchains and DAOs, it will be:

Do not treat them like a technology you just dont understand.

Treat them like a way of thinking which dismisses your and your organization's needs and gives you a sleek solution, asking not to ask too many questions.

Because that's what web3 is: the culture of techno-solutionism, of abandoning hard questions about humanity and community organization.

The exact anti-thesis of Solarpunk.

alxd, to architecture
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

A dear friend of mine, an student actively interested in and is currently visiting .

Is there anything you could recommend for him to see, any place to visit, people to meet? Do you know anyone from who could show him how the network works?

He might not be into software or hardware enough to appreciate cBase, he is more interested in city scale transport systems, urban planning and so on.

mullana,
@mullana@chaos.social avatar

@alxd

How about the tiny houses at Bauhaus Campus?
http://bauhauscampus.org/tiny-houses/

EDIT: Oh no, it might not be there anymore! 😢

alxd, to solarpunk
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Looks like there's a new on the block: https://www.sdrgames.studio/pages/why-we-fight by the creators of the "Earth Rising" board game.

"Why We Fight is a solo+ narrative TTRPG where you play a crew of eco-punks fighting fascism to build a brighter, greener future."

"(...) help struggling refugees and the havens they’ve made, and build a thriving, self-sustaining solar-punk community, all while pushing back against a force that seeks to blame the powerless (...)"

alxd, to sustainability
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

I was approached by a local theater working on its / future-thinking course for the youth (15-23 or so).

They would like me to design a narrative card game which could help the kids imagine a better, sustainable future, making them feel agency over their lives.

It needs to be easy to learn, use and have lesson plans.

I'm currently thinking along the lines of "For the Queen", "The Story Engine", "The Quiet Year", "Dialect"...

Johannes,
@Johannes@dice.camp avatar

@alxd I would like to tag in @armadajosh, because I know that's close to his interests, and he's made worldbuilding games like Polis, that takes inspiration from @benrobbins's and builds a city, complete with its story.

Johannes,
@Johannes@dice.camp avatar

@alxd @armadajosh @benrobbins This sounds great, I'm curious to hear what you will build. Let me know if you'd like more material or a bit of conversation/playstorming/testing at any point.

Edit: If you haven't seen In This World, you should definitely give it a look. For my money, it's the most world for the least effort I know of.
https://www.lamemage.com/inthisworld/

But maybe we can start a hashtag and see what else is out there?

alxd, to typescript
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Time for a post!

I'm looking for a / / 100% position, both contract and permanent, GMT+2 timezone.

I previously worked as a Senior / Lead / Principal developer with , and experience.

I specialize in , , , , , , , , and .

https://www.linkedin.com/in/paul-ngei/

alxd, to solarpunk Polish
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

[PL]

Mateusz Wyszyński z Mataj Fiction, laureat ostatniej edycji konkursu Polskiej Fundacji Fantastyki Naukowej, właśnie opublikował wideo o pisaniu i konflikcie dramatycznym w nim:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=If_UU4LS_r4

alxd, to boardgames
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

It seems that the new has introduced themes:

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2024/04/new-catan-game-has-overpopulation-pollution-fossil-fuels-and-clean-energy/

From what I read, it doesn't teach you or mindsets, it merely adds some pollution tokens, it doesn't reward players for cooperation.

Instead it implements some questionable allowing - and promoting - a win condition of betraying any climate alliances at the last moment to get the most points - essentially a prisoner's dilemma.

More at https://www.fastcompany.com/91071961/catan-new-energies-game-climate-change

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

I understand that the game is trying to mimic our world and show people "hey, not everybody will work together", but as you set victory conditions, you need to ask yourself what kind of emergent behaviors do you want to promote within the game.

Because sure, "best economy wins" and "you can totally betray others" is one way, but does your game teach sustainability, or use it as an aesthetic?

I have not played this Catan, I know only what's in the reviews.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Sometimes there is value in which doesn't try to copy neoliberal economical values, but instead challenges players to go for a different goal, like cooperating. Co-op games do not need to be boring!

I feel as if a lot of people forgot that the was initially designed as a caricature of capitalism, not as a family-friendly game of bankrupting everyone else.

alxd, to scifi
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Speaking long and essays, I find https://www.notthesky.com/posts/essays/the-men-who-sold-the-moon/ very interesting.

It outlines how a lot of the American "Golden Age" sci-fi limits our imagination by focusing on scientism and capitalism.

It then criticizes early Solarpunk (as visualized by the Chobani ad), showcasing how a movement focused on aesthetic only can be easily hijacked by capitalism and used for greenwashing (as we were recently reminded by Figma's CEO).

We need more communal, dirty Solarpunk.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

If you're looking for "where to go from here", I recommend Ada Palmer's https://beforewegoblog.com/purity-and-futures-of-hard-work-by-ada-palmer/

"We need all sorts of stories, but we have a special need for hopepunk right now, because, (...) this is one of those false-utopias which seemed great but has had its unforgivable underbelly exposed —climate impact, structural inequality, global inequity, systemic racism, dystopian tech.We need better models for what to do now than just blowing up the overlord’s tower, since that doesn’t fix it."

alberto_cottica, (edited )
@alberto_cottica@mastodon.green avatar

@alxd It is a beautiful essay. Thanks @adapalmer for writing it, and you for sharing it!

alxd, to scifi
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

I got some interesting feedback after my :

"The book isn't intended to provide hard technical solutions (...)"

That's not my criticism, though! I expect to provide signposts and narratives about the future, not blueprints.

"The Ministry..." refuses to acknowledge / imagine any kind of agency from the . That is not technology. That's a political stance.

alxd, to Futurology
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

Whether your friends consider water a commons or a hoardable private property is something worth finding before the Water Wars of the 2030s.

alxd, to Engineering
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

https://hackaday.com/2017/08/03/avoiding-the-engineer-saviour-trap/

A really good article on , and , reminding us not to pretend that we know the problem better than the people who experience it. We need to listen to them without preconceptions.

I think it is a very important foundation of .

If you're interested in engineering organizations working directly with the , I can recommend https://www.careables.org/

alxd, to solarpunk
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

I'm proud to present my of 's : https://alxd.org/ministry-for-the-future-review.html#ministry-for-the-future-review

Be warned, it's a !

After three long years of struggling with the book and analyzing it I finally put my thoughts into a coherent blogpost. I never expected the Ministry to be , but I hoped that it will paint a future to look forward to.

alxd,
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

@alberto_cottica @adamgreenfield thank you so much, I do owe you coffee ;)

I think I remembered it right then, he's backtracking on the terminology, not the solutionism / magical thinking itself.

alberto_cottica,
@alberto_cottica@mastodon.green avatar

@alxd hmm... I will have to disagree here nothing magical about digital currencies. And one of the central banks depicted in Ministry has the rollout of a digital form of cash on schedule right now. But I'll still take you up on coffee! :-) @adamgreenfield

alxd, to technology
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

A thought on in :

In , tech is an allegory for either oppression or rebellion, there's nothing outside the dichotomy.

In stories, tech is always a weapon and any other use is invisible.

In then, tech could be a "crystallized community", with the sum of its values, cultures and decisions codified into the they create.

alxd, to books
@alxd@writing.exchange avatar

The Messiah & The God-Emperor of Zurich

When I was reading I didn't actually register that the AI team of the Ministry proposed to create a new religion to support its shadow government.

It took away people's agency over their spirituality for purely political gain.

How is that different from the 's Bene Gesserit?

shekinahcancook,
@shekinahcancook@babka.social avatar

@alxd

It's not. And of course with their costume of black habits, they represent the Catholic church throughout history, which even now via opus dei etc is engaged in a judicial and legislative takeover of the United States. It's actually grimly amusing to watch evangelicals help them. They don't seem to grok that the only thing right wing catholicism hates more than women is...protestants. Evangelicals seem confused about whose religion is being legislated. Hint: not theirs.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • khanakhh
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • tester
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines