bathrobe,
bathrobe avatar

@TiffyBelle

@Bloonface

And if other instance owners have access to the private messages of people on every instance, that is a shockingly large flaw. I’m not exactly sure how insecure private messaging would be here. Not that I have people to message. But it being centralized would be more secure if decentralization would allow a much larger number of people to have access to something that, really, should be private.

There are an overwhelming number of people I don’t think are savvy or cynical enough, call it what you will, to understand that just because they call something a private message - or just because it’s supposed to be a one to one interaction - doesn’t mean no one else can see it. I would think, if anything, an overwhelming majority of people who send a private message/DM on a social media assume that no one else at ALL has access to that information.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fediverse
  • DreamBathrooms
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • slotface
  • mdbf
  • PowerRangers
  • tsrsr
  • kavyap
  • vwfavf
  • Durango
  • Leos
  • ngwrru68w68
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • anitta
  • All magazines