Et pour avoir accès à toute les fonctionalités, on a souvent recours au multicompte.
Pourquoi ne pas avoir une seule appli qui crée un compte maitre sur notre ordi et syncronise tes posts, tes abonnements, tes filtres ? Si l'instance tombe en raison de son budget, problème technique on conserverait nos données et on pourrait migrer facilement.
Cette meme appli pourrait gérer les alias. Et également cross-signer notre identité sur les appareils utilisés ?
Qu'en pensez-vous ? Ya des projets en ce sens ? Quel en serait le risque ou les limites ?
Pour moi l'oblectif est de faciliter la sauvegarde et l'exportation des données.
Pour le coup activitypods.org a l’air pas mal quand même, au-delà de la blague
What is the main shortcoming of ActivityPub ?
ActivityPub wants to make it possible to create decentralized apps. But to post videos, you need an account on a PeerTube instance. And to post images, you need an account on a PixelFed instance. You must thus handle multiple accounts, with their profile, list of followers, etc.
How does ActivityPods solve this shortcoming ?
With ActivityPods, you have only one profile, one outbox, one inbox and one list of followers - all in a single place. Applications connect to your Pod to post activities, read the inbox and fetch data. And of course they can connect to any existing fediverse application !
Seit seinen Anfangstagen hat #Facebook penibel darauf geachtet, alle... zu #eliminieren.
Der einfachste Weg das zu erreichen, ist es, Firmen zu kaufen, die eines Tages zur Konkurrenz werden könnten.
There is no reason why in this day and age that municipal, state, provincial, and federal #government cannot stand up their own #fediverse instances that they control to provide their citizens relevant information. Whether that be #mastodon, #lemmy, #kbin, #peertube, #pixelfeed, or #whatever. Why should we have to rely on #meta (#facebook and #instagram) or #x (#twitter) #databrokers for publicly funded and public relevant information and communication.
While that may be technically true (debatable), it misses the point of why they do it the way they do. Simply trying to convey information as an authoritative source is more easily solved by an announcements section on the official site, or a blog.
They post to Twitter (etc) because that’s where the people are, and that’s where the people want to see it. If the people wanted to sign up for SMS alerts, they would do it (and some have). If the people wanted the alerts on Mastodon, or Lemmy, or even something like Discord, they would do it.
That said, there’s very little reason for each agency, or even each city, to stand up their own instance for what is certain to be a very small feed.
Start with the need/desire, then design a solution to meet it. What you have described is a very specific solution that’s looking for a problem.