witchescauldron,
@witchescauldron@kolektiva.social avatar

In "governance" at the moment people are mostly crew, some are careerism, others are doing careerism.

Neither of these are real friends of any alternatives, they are friendly enemies ;)

evan,
@evan@cosocial.ca avatar

@witchescauldron I don't understand these terms. Is this good or bad?

witchescauldron,
@witchescauldron@kolektiva.social avatar

@evan it's what it is, I like grassroots and DIY and am not a fan of mess making, think we tip into this from now on, this is both good and bad, my view do better at holding culture and neticate in place while outreaching to

witchescauldron,
@witchescauldron@kolektiva.social avatar

@evan

"they are friendly enemies" this is a view of the polarization our freshly people push over "native" alt spaces, it makes a mess, let me illustrate:

An example of this are the guys, they are "well meaning" but talk to them and you get dogmatic liberal imperialism, pushing polarizing mess making.

Look at current shifts in It's now run by one person, the diversity is sidelined and silenced by the "common sense" of it's a shadow of the community it was and needs to be.

Experience the the lack of social buy in for this is feeding the

Our tech it self with its of admin, user etc, king and serf hardcoded allows the polarizing to embed.

All these initiatives are good and grassroots, but all are poisoned by the polarization of the dogmatic paths of the few people left in charge.

One way out of this mess is sortation based, consensus building, trust networking, democracy.

This is a completely normal recurring issue with grassroot activism, before we were we were doing better, the question we can't ask is how do we do better while .

The - as we can't keep doing the same shit, it's well past time to compost this mess.

witchescauldron,
@witchescauldron@kolektiva.social avatar

@evan

On the subject of the mailing list, It's hard to understand where/what/why. People forget to communicate the social understanding, this shrinks down the group, I don't know what it means, why it matters and what agender are being pushed there. It's my subject, so I should be interested, this is obtusely a problem for communication. i.e. a mess :)

msaunders,

@evan

and are not positive terms in my personal estimation.
But I guess it depends on personal stance ;)

The to me (also a programmer) is where tech-obsessives build almost for the sake of building, do not consider the repercussions of their work and end up making shit worse.
E.g. the 'like' button

is more obvious. While it is sometimes nice to feel part of something big, it's where diversity goes to die.

@witchescauldron

msaunders,

@evan
I guess another shining example of the would be https://xkcd.com/927/ though that also reflects a societal problem of scale.

The more people who have to agree on something the more impossible it becomes.

And people say they want a single global society.
How insane that is.

A true global society may only exist paradoxically (better word?).

It may only exist by virtue of smaller, actually functioning, autonomous, sovereign bioregions working together.

@witchescauldron

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • fediverse
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • mdbf
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • tester
  • ethstaker
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines