"The Court considered that such [an indiscriminate data] retention did not remain within the bounds of what was necessary in a democratic society. Consequently, the retention of, access to and processing of the data in the
context of the criminal proceedings against the applicant had breached his #privacy rights."
The Danish government is expanding its "targeted" #dataretention scheme [1]. Currently, it covers 67% of the population (based on residence in the targeted geographical areas). With the new additional targeting criteria, the coverage will be 74% of the population (according to this answer to a parliamentary question https://www.ft.dk/samling/20231/almdel/reu/spm/590/svar/2022917/2825586/index.htm).
🇬🇧 I received fully ■■■■■■ redacted participant lists of the EU’s #GoingDark anti-encryption group that is also forging plans for resurrecting #DataRetention.
La pubblicazione via social del video che ritrae la giudice #Apostolico solleva alcuni dubbi in diritto, sia per la divulgazione fatta dal ministro #salvini sia per la fase sottostante e antecedente a tale divulgazione.
@NancyFaeser@GreensEFA 🇬🇧 Even the statistics of the German police make it clear: IP-#DataRetention does not help with #ChildProtection, as is claimed. @EU_Commission & #GoingDark – give up your plans and find real solutions!
DE: @GreensEFA