echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪 75 Jahre – und -Frau von der Leyen höhlt es über die EU Schritt für Schritt aus. ’s EU-Kommission hat in den letzten fünf Jahren auf den Weg gebracht:

💥Zerstörung des durch
💥Personenkennziffer für jeden Bürger
💥Wiedereinführung der ( HLG)
💥Online-Tracking & Microtargeting geht fast unverändert weiter
💥Legalisierung von 's illegaler Massendatensammlung
💥ausländische Behörden können in Deutschland legale Internetinhalte ohne Richterbeschluss löschen lassen
💥Zulassung flächendeckender im
💥Industriezugriff auf unsere ohne unsere Einlilligung

Zensursula’s Europa braucht !

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Ursula von der Leyen has been continuously eroding our fundamental rights. In the past five years, her EU Commission proposed:

❌the end of private messaging and secure encryption
❌introducing unique citizen identifiers
❌a working group to resurrect indiscriminate
❌essentially unchanged online tracking & micro-targeting practices
❌legalising 's unlawful bulk data collection practices
❌ultra-fast cross-border online content removals without court orders
❌allowing for in the
❌granting industry access to our without our consent

Von der Leyen’s Europe needs digital freedom fighters!

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 The mission of the intransparent group:

Reintroduction of the blanket, 🇪🇺-wide of Internet, phone and location records – possibly following the Belgian model, although NGOs are already taking legal action against this.
https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/faeffd54-8079-4f7a-af57-5d3c4c1f17cd_en?filename=HLG-background-document-16012024.pdf

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Have you heard about the plan to reintroduce blanket & undermine 🔓?

Intransparent 🇪🇺 work on what the new EU Parliament & Commission should implement after the will be finalised in Mai & June.

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 🤔 How absurd is the German Minister of Interior's call for blanket of citizen's IP records?

🤷 According to her own party's election program, the "strongly oppose general data retention" (at least on paper).
https://www.spd.de/fileadmin/Dokumente/Beschluesse/2024_SPD_Europaprogramm_EN.pdf

grillchen, to random
@grillchen@brotka.st avatar

did the European Court of Justice just fucked civil rights?

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 It took Commissioner 13 weeks to answer my questions about the surveillance architects, saying that minimal is granted only on a "case-by-case basis". My next question is on the way
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-003494-ASW_EN.html

echo_pbreyer, to Bulgaria German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪Etappensieg für Bürgerrechte 🙌 : Anstelle maßloser Internet- beschließt Ampel !
Jetzt FDP-Entwurf nachbessern & die -Pläne der
-Kommission zur IP-VDS stoppen:
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/etappensieg-internet-vorratsdatenspeicherung-abgesagt-quick-freezen-achbesserungsbedurftig/

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧🙌 Fighting pays off: German government will not reintroduce but agrees to introduce / data preservation powers instead.
A huge success and a clear signal to the entire - drop now!

edsantos, to random
@edsantos@ciberlandia.pt avatar

10 years of Digital Rights Ireland decision and the invalidation of the directive, “the most privacy invasive instrument ever adopted by the EU” (EDPS)
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62012CJ0293

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪Heute vor 10 Jahren hat ein EuGH-Grundsatzurteil die EU-Richtlinie zur wahllosen aller unserer Verbindungen, Bewegungen und auch IP-Adressen als Verletzung unseres Grundrechts auf Privatsphäre gekippt - grandios!

Wir führen den Kampf weiter.

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧10 years ago today, an ECJ landmark judgement annulled the EU directive on indiscriminate of all our contacts, movements and IP addresses as a violation of our fundamental right to privacy - fantastic! https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-04/cp140054en.pdf

We are fighting on...

echo_pbreyer, to Belgium German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Liberties‘ Report 2024 finds that & ignore jurisprudence on . https://dq4n3btxmr8c9.cloudfront.net/files/oj7hht/Liberties_Rule_Of_Law_Report_2024_FULL.pdf

➡️ It‘s obvious: The 🇪🇺 Commission should enforce 🇪🇺 law and stop the programme aiming at even more !

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar
echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 May 17: At its last meeting the biased group will agree to recommend EU-wide and undermining . Next, the Commission will propose concrete actions for follow-up. Why should be dissolved: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/public-going-dark-consultation-pirate-meps-call-for-an-end-to-the-undemocratic-surveillance-forge/

why0hy, to random
@why0hy@eupolicy.social avatar

“ The document also emphasises that nothing should contradict fundamental rights, a point that should be explicitly stated in the regulation.”
Just like the directive?
https://www.euractiv.com/section/law-enforcement/news/belgian-eu-presidency-presents-new-risk-assessment-methodology-for-child-sexual-abuse-law/

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪Straßburger Menschenrechtsgerichtshof urteilt, dass pauschale gegen die verstößt, weil solche in einer Demokratie nicht erforderlich ist.
Slowenischer Fall: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-230885

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧The Strasbourg Human Rights Court rules systemic, general & indiscriminate to violate the European Convention on Human Rights because it is not necessary in a democratic society.
Slovenian case: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/?i=001-230885

ilumium, to privacy
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

The Court did it again! 🎉

"The Court considered that such [an indiscriminate data] retention did not remain within the bounds of what was necessary in a democratic society. Consequently, the retention of, access to and processing of the data in the
context of the criminal proceedings against the applicant had breached his rights."


https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/app/conversion/pdf/?library=ECHR&id=003-7877090-10950833&filename=Judgment%20%C5%A0koberne%20v.%20Slovenia%20-%20systematic%20and%20indiscriminate%20retention%20of%20telecommunications%20data%2C%20amid%20proceedings%20against%20judge%20for%20bribery.pdf

je5perl, to random
@je5perl@eupolicy.social avatar

The Danish government is expanding its "targeted" scheme [1]. Currently, it covers 67% of the population (based on residence in the targeted geographical areas). With the new additional targeting criteria, the coverage will be 74% of the population (according to this answer to a parliamentary question https://www.ft.dk/samling/20231/almdel/reu/spm/590/svar/2022917/2825586/index.htm).

[1] Analysis of the Danish 2022 data retention law https://itpol.dk/articles/new-Danish-data-retention-law-2022 (see section "Assessment of the targeted data retention regime").

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪Portugiesisches Verfassungsgericht kassiert 2. Gesetz zur
, und Parlament beschließt prompt den
3. Versuch unter dem Deckmantel “richterliche
Anordnung”. https://edri.org/our-work/portugal-new-data-retention-law-fails-at-the-constitutional-court-parliament-will-try-for-a-third-time/

Wo Gerichte so verachtet werden, steht der Rechtsstaat auf dem Spiel!

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧Portugese constitutional court annuls second law on indiscriminate . Parliament adopts third attempt with court authorisation, but no different in substance. https://edri.org/our-work/portugal-new-data-retention-law-fails-at-the-constitutional-court-parliament-will-try-for-a-third-time/

High time to defend the rule of law where courts are systematically ignored!

d3, to random Portuguese
@d3@ciberlandia.pt avatar

Contributo da D3 no EDRi-gram de hoje, por @edsantos:

«Portugal: New data retention law fails at the Constitutional court; Parliament will try for a third time»

@edri

https://edri.org/our-work/portugal-new-data-retention-law-fails-at-the-constitutional-court-parliament-will-try-for-a-third-time/

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇩🇪Jetzt reagieren 21 NGOs auf meine Recherchen zur -Anti-Verschlüsselungsgruppe und prangern Einseitigkeit und Intransparenz an. https://netzpolitik.org/2024/going-dark-mal-anders-zivilgesellschaft-bleibt-im-dunkeln-bei-eu-beratungen-zu-verschluesselung/

Wir bleiben hier hartnäckig - versprochen!

echo_pbreyer,
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧Now 21 NGOs react to my research on the anti-encryption and pro group, denouncing one-sidedness and lack of transparency: https://edri.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Civil-Society-Letter-to-HLG-Going-Dark-on-Transparency-and-Participation.pdf

We will not relent to dig up what we can on this covert anti-privacy plotting - promise!

remixtures, to Bulgaria Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "This post will argue that the HADOPI system is contrary to the Court’s extensive data retention case law on two counts. First, the HADOPI system operates by relying on automated access to traffic data, which under the Court’s current case law (discussed further below) can only be retained for the purpose of combatting serious crime. Even the AG agrees that copyright infringements clearly cannot be classified as a serious crime (para. 38 of the Opinion). Secondly, the massive access to this traffic data takes place without prior authorisation from a national court or an independent administrative authority.

In his two Opinions, AG Szpunar presents a very different analysis of the case. He concludes that the HADOPI is compatible with EU law. In doing so, he proposes a revision – in his words, a “development” (para. 30 of the second Opinion) – of the Court’s case law on data retention in the online sphere, which will have wide-ranging consequences for the privacy and data protection of everyone using the internet."

https://europeanlawblog.eu/2023/12/04/a-complete-u-turn-in-jurisprudence-hadopi-and-the-future-of-the-cjeus-authority/

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 I received fully ■■■■■■ redacted participant lists of the EU’s anti-encryption group that is also forging plans for resurrecting .

👋 EU Commission
, name those responsible now!
https://fragdenstaat.de/a/288508 @EP_GreensEFA

echo_pbreyer, (edited ) to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧Caution: A 🇪🇺 Council report confirms that government's little-known " initiative seeks to (…) develop a clear framework for " by mid-2024. The next plenary meeting of this group is said to be scheduled for 21 November https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-12943-2023-INIT/en/pdf

echo_pbreyer, (edited ) to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

@GreensEFA 🇬🇧 Portugal: A working group brainstormed for 476 days. Result: After failing in court with blanket , they are again proposing the same illegal with almost no changes. @GreensEFA https://www.kiratas.com/2023/10/15/after-a-court-ban-portugal-makes-a-new-attempt-at-data-retention/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=mastodon

informapirata, to privacy Italian
@informapirata@mastodon.uno avatar

Tutte le regole che Salvini ha violato pubblicando il video con le immagini della giudice Apostolico

@giornalismo

La pubblicazione via social del video che ritrae la giudice solleva alcuni dubbi in diritto, sia per la divulgazione fatta dal ministro sia per la fase sottostante e antecedente a tale divulgazione.

Di @Vitalba su

https://www.editorialedomani.it/politica/tutte-le-regole-che-salvini-ha-violato-pubblicando-il-video-con-le-immagini-della-giudice-apostolico-ksrx1rj4

echo_pbreyer, (edited ) to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧ECJ Advocate General recommends indiscriminate IP to prosecute file sharing.
Originally the Court justified IP with the need to investigate child sexual exploitation - a myth, as our video shows: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-09/cp230151en.pdf

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines