@J12t@social.coop avatar

J12t

@J12t@social.coop

Technologist, founder, organizer.

Let's put people back in control of their technology. The Fediverse is a good start. Also wondering aloud where we are taking this planet.

Check out my home page for more info and links.

He/him. tfr

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

J12t, to meta
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Finally I'm getting around to listen to @mike 's Dot.Social episode with @rklambo and @pcottle from , talking about .

Mike asks the most important question first: "why are you [Meta] doing this [Fediverse integration]?"

[cont]

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Rachel provides two key reasons (my phrasing):

  1. wants to be the best place where people have relevant, public, real-time conversations, and the is the means by which people can find the audiences that are best for those conversations, because not all of them will be on Threads.

  2. The fediverse is a compelling way for creators to own their audiences in a way they aren't able to own on other apps today.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@mike asks: How foundational in the Fediverse to Threads? Or is it just a feature?

A: Fediverse was part of the planning from the very beginning. There are lot of new things to introduce users to, and also a lot of new things to understand when federating beyond what a typical app does. Like how can users control what happens, and understand what happens?

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@mike asks: what about other federation protocols like ?

A: is a W3C standard, that's important. It's also been battle-tested over the years.

@pcottle muses it would be interesting to "port over" some AtProto features to ActivityPub, like account portability.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Rachel: people have more choice when their apps integrate with the []. They get to go where the rules are that align most with their values, and they get to vote with their feet.

Also exciting from the product development perspective: if you don't have to build your own [social] graph, you get to spend more time on cool functionality.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Mike asks: how has the reaction been?

Rachel: people are excited to see that we are actually doing this! So far we are not actively promoting the Fediverse, but the adoption numbers have been good. We also still have some things to work through, like communicating tradeoffs.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Peter: people have been asking creators on Threads to turn on Fediverse sharing (it's opt-in): it's so much easier to turn on fediverse sharing than to post to an entirely different social network.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Mike: what are the next steps?

Rachel: first milestone was the publish out from Threads.

2nd and next: get engagement from the fediverse back into threads ie comments and likes etc

3rd: follow people from the fediverse in Threads.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Mike commends Rachel and Peter and other Meta people reaching out to the community and listening to concerns and feedback, such as at :

I would agree with that. It's unusual for a large company to do this kind of thing, but absolutely the right and necessary thing to do when engaging with the Fediverse.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Mike: What are the main concerns?

Rachel: fair share of criticism. Trying to approach this as a good citizen.

Pulling the rug out of it now would also impact very negatively the overall story Meta has been trying to build about open source and how they engage with the community.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Shout-out to @mike: he's asking all the good questions about federation and beyond on his dot.social podcast.

Now: do you see federation more broadly as it relates to (other parts of) Meta, like Instagram and other social products you have?

Nor surprisingly, he gets a bit of a non-answer: it's early days, we have a lot to learn, how are people reacting etc.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@pcottle adds that in his view, the fediverse makes more sense for public conversations, as opposed to his example of his own Instagram profile that he has set to private.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Both Rachel and Peter suggest that some moderation functionality could/should become part of the protocol stack. does composable moderation and that is really cool. Peter hopes that may learn from it and evolve in this direction.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Rachel: one of the challenges with the fediverse is: how do you figure out where your content went, and how can I follow that conversation that now exists on multiple different servers?

Wants all replies in the same spot. That helps feel people in control.

This is actually a really good point imho. It's not just confusing that reply trees aren't eventually consistent across the fediverse, but it creates uncertainty because I don't even know what people say in response.

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar
J12t, to bluesky
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Jack Dorsey interview post-. Whatever you think of him, his views on why he helped getting Bluesky started in the first place are interesting. I wonder which of those might apply to the Fediverse (which he doesn't mention at all).

https://www.piratewires.com/p/interview-with-jack-dorsey-mike-solana

J12t, to privacy
@J12t@social.coop avatar

"Navigating User Privacy in the Decentralized Social Web".

Online webinar, sponsored by Meta.

Just fluttered into my inbox.

https://www.privacylaws.com/events-gateway/events/fediverse2024/

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

“Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPT”

Yet another amazing the-not-exploitative-alternative business opportunity.

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/stack-overflow-bans-users-en-masse-for-rebelling-against-openai-partnership-users-banned-for-deleting-answers-to-prevent-them-being-used-to-train-chatgpt

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Protocol-invention-itis:

A widespread disease among software developers.

Like for other diseases, a simple vaccination -- ahem, a bit of research on what exists already -- can eliminate 90% of the outbreaks.

Just sayin'.

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@suddjian I don’t think that the problem is that people don’t know about what exists…

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Broken temperature records for every single day over the entire last year.

https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-68921215

J12t, to bluesky
@J12t@social.coop avatar

So is implementing an (unspecified) new protocol for direct messages. Because AtProto is really not suitable for anything that isn't 100% public.

I wonder whether they can do this now that Jack is off the board. But maintaining two separate protocols in the same app? Who knows, maybe is next?

https://bsky.social/about/blog/05-07-2024-product-roadmap

J12t,
@J12t@social.coop avatar

@evan @tomcoates ☝☝☝

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar

Nice that somebody states publicly what has long been obvious in private. +2.5-3°C this century. Not 1.5°C.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/may/08/world-scientists-climate-failure-survey-global-temperature

J12t, to random
@J12t@social.coop avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • mdbf
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • slotface
  • PowerRangers
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • tsrsr
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • rosin
  • tacticalgear
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • osvaldo12
  • vwfavf
  • modclub
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • All magazines