I bet if you formed an electric car company made only of people who previously worked for Tesla then quit in disgust, you could make a really good electric car company
This would be a really interesting time to join the company. They're so close to finally delivering vehicles and unlocking revenue and if they don't do it this year they'll run out of money
The Telegraph headline on Palestinian refugees is in essence identical to how rightwing British tabloids wrote about Jewish refugees when Britain denied them safe refuge during the Holocaust.
These institutions are dedicated to White supremacy at all costs. They view us as disposable nonhumans.
Any PoC and/or Jew who thinks these people are on their side is wrong. They may temporarily pretend to not hate Jews or Ukrainians or whoever but that’s all it is: temporary.
@ayoub General reminder that the characterization of hamas as rapists is sourced in a news story that has long been discredited: it was fabricated and is used as propaganda to dehumanize Palestinians and justify genocide
The subtext of this subtitle is "they all look the same to me"
Copyright law doesn't protect small artists; small artists don't have the resources to defend their "rights" with legal recourse
It protects investors in content factories like Sony and Disney
Everything they claim they can do thanks to copyright enforcement existed before copyright law existed, it was just more difficult for factory-owners to monopolize and extract profit from
I was today years old when I learned "parking" literally used to refer to civic green space lining the roads
So every time you say parking you're directly referencing a thing that was lost during the automobile's aggressive and costly takeover of public spaces
The reason the IDF is 1000% convinced that Hamas is under the hospital is because the military bunker and tunnel system in the basement is real: the IDF built it for its own use in 1983
And yes it was all under a hospital back then, too
I'm pretty sure exploiting the fediverse is ridiculously easy: #activitypub
compatibility doesn't really restrict you from very much by default
If you're operating on activitypub your server is hoovering up raw JSONs from the rest of the fediverse and you can do all of the analysis you want, which is Facebook's core competency
Then, you serve all of that content to your users and you don't claim responsibility for it
And remember there are nazis in the fediverse, too
Facebook as an outrage machine/addiction-maker will be a much "better" product (at accomplishing those goals), once it's the mainstream gateway to the most extreme social media content available
So then their gamble is regulators can't say "hey why aren't you regulating these nazis on your platform" because they don't control the servers the nazis are posting on
"In the degrowth literature, a caricature of the typical economist is presented as believing in unlimited economic growth, and that growth should be pursued regardless of its environmental impact. This is a straw man. It would be a naïve economist who did not recognise that constraints exist. And economists usually limit their projections to a few decades to come, rather than to the infinite future, in which they supposedly believe in unlimited exponential economic growth. Certainly, there are theoretical economic growth models which portray the possibility of exponential growth into the infinite future, but economists have had enough common sense not to assume stylised theoretical models are the be-all-and-end-all when it comes to public policy."
Then why, Mr. Tunny, is it so hard to find an economist who can tell us when the economy should stop growing?
There are "serious economists", there are politically-motivated economists, and there are bankers and fund managers and financial advisors who call themselves economists in order to give their recommendations credibility
You are actively superseding his work on the fly in order to make it seem defensible for this conversation: so you should recognize that means it's not, in reality, defensible, and that people reading this thread can also figure it out pretty quickly
If quantifying harm to human lives is merely a distraction, then what is the primary goal of your policy preferences?
Asking because I've stated before in this conversation that people object (rightfully) to a balance of interests that privileges the survival of capital portfolios over human lives
What happened is Thomas Piketty published in 2013 and conservatives have no equivalently rigorous response. They grasp for people like Nordhaus out of desperation
Like how worsening wealth inequality and federal protection of corporate interests is meant to lead to the total welfare of the global population?
I mean given that these things are currently leading rapidly in the opposite direction yes I agree the conclusions are really weird (and indistinguishable from what you've been proposing)
@sam It's appalling but I would even negotiate along the lines of "if military support is withdrawn, I will vote for Biden"
That still means I would be voting for somebody who did enthusiastically fund a genocide, but at least leadership would be showing itself capable of responding to reality
But that's only a minor risk: I don't think it'll come to that (I think they'll keep sending arms to Israel no matter what)
@WayneKoberstein@Infoseepage@DrALJONES Not voting for one reprehensible candidate does not mean you are voting for the other reprehensible candidate. It's up to every incumbent to choose policies that can be supported if they want to be re-elected: it's not the voter's responsibility to change their values.
If the consequence of the Biden administration's inability to refrain from genocide is that another genocidal candidate is elected, there is a clear responsible party (and it's not me)
"You should feature student art"
Myself, technically a student artist again: "So this picture is a lady urinating on a tank and she brought extra water"
"Other students"
"I see"