uact, to Freedom

We had registered an for that was to deal with the agression by regimes against leaning .

The assembly was rejected.

[1/6]

State of our assembly: rejected.

sb, to random
@sb@fed.sbcloud.cc avatar

Ban today.

Make them .

Seize their and our .

Raise everyone up.

cazabon, to politics

Apologies, as this will be a bit , but it will come back to , I promise.

First, the of views along a single left-right is almost . This has long been known, and alternatives exist that present a much more accurate picture, but the traditional is to " this" and " that" and is lazy, so they'll probably never get better.

One was developed by Jerry .

1/x

cazabon,

If you are that these sorts of large-scale, centrally-planned can solve social problems that have existed in for hundreds or thousands of years, then you fall towards the bottom end of the axis.

If you think about your in these two areas, you might find yourself at where you fit on the chart, and what other belief systems fall near you. It's a lot more than the left-right single axis.

6/x

fulelo, (edited ) to Women
@fulelo@journa.host avatar

'The myth that men hunt while women stay at home is entirely wrong

An analysis of from around the world has found that in the vast majority of those looked at, confirming that the idea of gender division in providing food is a myth"

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2380011-the-myth-that-men-hunt-while-women-stay-at-home-is-entirely-wrong/#Echobox=1688893725

petersuber, to ChatGPT
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

vs for Care: Truth and 'Truthiness'
https://www.medpagetoday.com/popmedicine/popmedicine/104987

We need more of this — subject-matter experts testing tools for accuracy. Let's scale it up and make it systematic. Many more subject areas and many more AI tools. Repeated periodically to track progress.

This would be a good role for scholarly .

petersuber, to internet
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Excellent.
https://zenodo.org/record/7974099

"Scholarly organizations, in particular learned , are now facing a golden opportunity to…support the migration of the scholarly community from to …Demonstrating that the scholarly community [can create] a truly public square for scholarly discourse, impervious to private takeover, might…inspire [it] to focus on analogous solutions for…text, data & code – to safeguard all publicly owned scholarly knowledge."

CharlieMcHenry, to random
@CharlieMcHenry@connectop.us avatar

- it’s something most humans do, yet it has a questionable reputation. I took a deep dive look into it, and wrote an essay: “In Defense of Gossip”. Turns out that Gossip plays an important role in sorting out our social standing, and you’ll be surprised at where it actually came from. It’s a four minute read, max. Check it out. https://medium.com/an-idea/in-defense-of-gossip-278668d7339f

petersuber, to fediverse
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • kavyap
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • rosin
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • Leos
  • tester
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines