@scottmatter@aus.social
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

scottmatter

@scottmatter@aus.social

small axe working for sustained / systemic change (he / him).

Also Senior Lecturer, TD School at UTS.

Some areas of interest: #anthropology, #anarchism #ethnography #strategicDesign #serviceDesign #foresight #futures #buddhism #hockey #music #collectiveImprovisation #speculativeEverything #JustTransition #politicalEcology #Australia #Canada

[Banner image is a panoramic photo with snowshoe tracks on Maligne Lake, Jasper NP, December 2018]

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

scottmatter, to Futurology
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

Looking for examples of qualitative, ethnographic work on experiences and experiments with

I’m scoping a new project and hoping to find examples to help set context for the proposed project.

NicoleCRust, to science
@NicoleCRust@neuromatch.social avatar

When should one call themselves an X researcher?

There are so many different types of researchers. Weather researchers, climate researchers, brain researchers. And within those categories, the nuances (like memory researchers).

When someone says they are an X researcher, what does that imply to you? In other words, what qualifies? Does it just imply that they are curious about X? Or perhaps that they know a bit more about it - perhaps they've mastered some scholarly literature or they've done at least one experiment? Or maybe even published a paper in a peer reviewed journal? Or maybe even more - perhaps they have a body of work on the topic; maybe they even run a lab (and have grants to support X research).

On one hand, no one should gate keep curiosity! On the other, certain terms imply knowledge and qualifications. I'm a "researcher". But just because I know a lot about memory doesn't automatically mean that people should listen to me about climate or economics. And I once read a very good book about ecosystems, but I don't think that means I should quality as an ecosystem researcher. So what, then, might instead?

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@benjamingeer @vicgrinberg @NicoleCRust

I wonder about distinguishing professional and academic researchers too?

There are roles (in industry and government at least) called “researcher” where the task is basically collect data, analyze, and report findings. But the scope of inquiry is extremely limited compared with what an academic researcher might do.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@vicgrinberg @benjamingeer @NicoleCRust

Yep, feels right.

Troubled a bit by the old “applied vs pure” research dichotomy here though, and how that plays out in universities in terms of prestige, promotion, and funding

kcarruthers, to random
@kcarruthers@mastodon.social avatar

We are doomed as a species 🤦‍♀️😷
https://arvr.social/@mpesce/112443991548195663

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@kcarruthers

There are around 8 billion of us. The Raw Milk Vax Schemers are a tiny proportion of that.

I’d be way more concerned with the even smaller number of billionaires and the capitalist institutions they operate in terms of our survival as a species

urlyman, to random
@urlyman@mastodon.social avatar

#climateDiary
I would really like green growth to work.

For everyone.

But for me,
from where we are,
within the terms with which we currently define economic growth…

it doesn’t look remotely realistic.

But the artefacts of pursuing it could provide a crash pad

for a bit
for some.

That’s something

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@urlyman

Palliative care is still care, I suppose.

scottmatter, to academia
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

WTAF?!?

"When applying a risk assessment framework to universities, research is an activity that is inherently high risk, since we are working to create something that is not yet known."

#academia #academicChatter #universities #research

scottmatter, to random
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

Trying to think through the current situation of and and wondering where in the process we are?

“Here is how platforms die: first, they are good to their users; then they abuse their users to make things better for their business customers; finally, they abuse those business customers to claw back all the value for themselves. Then, they die.”

Clearly we can think of universities as platforms, where many actors plays roles of producers and consumers, users and customers.

I’m wary of nostalgia about the role universities have played in the past, and of idealized models.

But I think we may be in the middle stage - the university platform in many countries seems to have been transformed into worker-production systems where, absurdly, the proto-workers go into debt to gain credentials that allow them access to labour markets.

The business customers here are employers and lenders, who gain access to a pool of people who are financially precarious from whom to extract both labour and loan repayments.

I’m not sure universities (or many businesses, for that matter) actually reach the final stage of enshittification. Though maybe the pressure to cut costs and generate operating revenue (from tuition, often from exorbitant fees charged to international students, but also via commercialization of research) is an example of moving into the third stage?

https://pluralistic.net/2023/01/21/potemkin-ai/

ajsadauskas, to auspol
@ajsadauskas@aus.social avatar

So despite climate change, Australia's federal government has just committed an extra $3.25 billion into building a toll road and a 20-lane freeway widening.

For those who wonder why Aussies think toll roads are a scam (https://aus.social/@LesserAbe@lemmy.world/112405373613706682), here's a great example of why.

"Pouring an extra $3.25 billion worth of federal funds into Melbourne’s North East Link is a good use of taxpayer money, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has insisted, despite the project’s cost doubling just a few months ago.

...

"The North East Link – which includes 6½ kilometres of tunnels – will stretch from Bulleen to Greensborough. It will widen the Eastern Freeway by up to 20 lanes.

"Allan revealed in December that the 10-kilometre toll road had more than doubled in cost since it was first announced.

"The toll road was initially budgeted at $10 billion and reassessed in 2019 at $15 billion. But the government revealed last year that the updated cost estimate was $26 billion."

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/federal-funding-to-boost-victorian-road-link-by-3-25-billion-20240509-p5ii7b.html

@fuck_cars #Urbanism #Auspol #Vicpol #roads #UrbanPlanning #transport #cities #Melbourne #Naarm #Victoria #Australia

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@ajsadauskas @fuck_cars

With the More Gas Strategy they announced today, there’s no way to pretend this government gives any fucks about mitigating climate change.

ajsadauskas, to Trains
@ajsadauskas@aus.social avatar

Looks like Sydney Trains is going to drop the jargon from its PA announcements.

From the SMH:

"Commuters will soon be told to “get off” the train, rather than “alight”, after Sydney Trains resolved to overhaul its station announcements to favour colloquial language.

"The phrase “this train terminates here” is also being retired, due to concerns the word “terminates” is difficult to understand."

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/this-phrase-terminates-here-sydney-train-announcement-overhaul-20240502-p5foby.html

@sydneytrains #trains #sydney #nsw #transit #planning #train #UrbanPlanning

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@wscholermann @Tau

Almost certainly.

b9AcE, to random
@b9AcE@todon.eu avatar

Oh, great.
Went to do some laundry at the apartment complex communal laundry building, buuut... the mandatory electronic booking system has run out of storage space, so all it displays is an error page and no times can be booked, so as a consequence the laundry room can not be entered by any tenant.

Was using a pencil and paper really so bad?
Those didn't unexpectedly run out of storage space nor lock us out unless we had written down our booked time first.
Sigh.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@b9AcE

Pencil and paper is too easy for someone to come by and erase. The only viable solution is to encode it on the blockchain.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@b9AcE

That key system sounds fascinating!

inquiline, to random
@inquiline@union.place avatar

" now finds itself in a far more vulnerable place. The attack last night was pure anarchy in which violent thugs were given free rein, seemingly with the tacit support of law enforcement. It placed scores of anti-war demonstrators in the encampment in direct and serious danger.

Moreover, the actions last night do absolutely nothing to assure the security and well-being of Jewish students, staff or faculty"

https://forward.com/opinion/608479/ucla-violence-campus-protests/

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@inquiline

Weird word-choice, using anarchy when chaos, violence, or malicious incompetence would probably be more accurate, eh?

gerrymcgovern, to random
@gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green avatar

“As a society, we have to admit that, despite 50 years of knowledge about the dynamics of the collapse of our life support systems, we have failed to initiate a systematic change to prevent this collapse. It is becoming increasingly clear that, despite technological advances, the change needed to put us on a different trajectory will also require a change in belief systems, mindsets, and the way we organize our society.”

https://tomdispatch.com/eco-collapse-hasnt-happened-yet-but-you-can-see-it-coming/

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@largess @GhostOnTheHalfShell @gerrymcgovern

It’s a classic structure-agency paradox. As individuals we can make choices about how to behave, but those choices are constrained (and enabled) by the system in which we behave.

Our actions reproduce (and can subtly evolve) the systemic structure around us.

Cultural politics is a thing (loosely defined as the continuous making and evaluation of claims about what sorts of behaviour and values are legitimate and acceptable), in which we all participate by virtue of living in a social system.

But not all actors have the same influence in cultural politics and in the reproduction or transformation of the system.

In our current situation, we have a very small number of highly influential actors (including organizations as actors), which use wealth and political connections to bend structure in ways that enable behaviours that continue to benefit them.

The mechanisms they use range from advertising / influence campaigns (propaganda), to regulatory capture, to outright violence.

The who’s-to-blame conversation really has to be a both-and, not an either-or.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@FantasticalEconomics @largess @GhostOnTheHalfShell @gerrymcgovern

Others may have used that phrase before, not sure. Broadly, it mostly falls under “practice” theory.

I’m coming at this from areas of social theory that include Bourdieu and Giddens, Sherry Ortner’s classic “theory in anthropology since the 1960s”, Manuel de Landa (especially 1000 years of nonlinear history), and more recently work on “theory of social practices” by folks like Elizabeth Shove and Stephen Kemmis.

I should also probably revisit stuff by Stuart Hall and by Gramsci and others who cite them.

scottmatter, to random
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

Reading this fascinating profile (sorry, probably paywalled) and wondering whether the discourse around weight-loss, health, obesity, etc is mainly trying to push on the wrong leverage point. The (erroneous) idea that our bodies are a manifestation of our virtue and strength-of-will, rather than an indicator of material and energy flows through a much larger complex system, seems to be a root cause of this apparent contradiction between pro-fat and pro-weight-loss factions.

This quote from the piece stands out:

“Sole-Smith does not dispute that in some cases, excess fat may contribute to disease, but she believes that weight stigma is “the foundation of everything about weight and health that nobody has been looking at for so long.” She is part of a fractious, vocal band of activists and advocates who argue that the real epidemic is bias, not obesity. Some reject even the word “obesity,” which is a medical diagnosis, as derogatory, too tangled with a long history of sexism and racism from doctors, advertisers, and health editors to be neutral.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/21/well/eat/fat-activist-virginia-sole-smith.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

JohnBarentine, to conservative
@JohnBarentine@astrodon.social avatar

Are some evolving in response to light pollution?

"We find a stark decline in blacklight trap efficacy over 25 years of monitoring in Delaware, USA, mirrored over 10 years of monitoring in New Jersey, USA. While the precise causes of this decline remain a subject for discussion, the practical consequences are clear: insect conservationists cannot fully rely on long-term trends from entomological light traps."

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10841-024-00588-x

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@JohnBarentine

Could it be that moths avoiding light traps survive to reproduce and pass on that behavior or tendency to their offspring?

Less about light pollution in general than about a mechanism that works directly on species reproduction?

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@royvangrunsven @JohnBarentine

Not a moth specialist, but given these are “blacklight traps” does it then require moths to perceive and respond to street lights and blacklight in the same way?

fraying, to random
@fraying@xoxo.zone avatar

It's not just that Meta's AI bot posted something weird and wrong. It's that it posted anything at all in a Facebook group. This is showing what I keep saying: Facebook, a company that came to power by getting people to talk to each other, wants to replace those people with computers. They want a Facebook that talks to itself. They hate their users and want to replace them, and any company that implements "AI" in this way wants the same thing.

https://www.404media.co/facebooks-ai-told-parents-group-it-has-a-disabled-child/

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@fraying

Fwiw, emerging user behavior (observed among students in the undergraduate classes I teach) suggests this is fine. The default for many seems to be “I type a question and the machine gives me an answer”. Clicking through to an original source or even another page is a step beyond what they expect to do.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@fraying

Making the information ecosystem a self-referential Ouroboros. As long as they can find a way to make it generate returns for shareholders, they don’t care.

scottmatter, to ai
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

Love the corrective to hype, and now have more than just to throw at the situation.

https://softwarecrisis.dev/letters/llmentalist/

grimalkina, to random
@grimalkina@mastodon.social avatar

Realizing how many software engineering conversations pull probability estimates out of thin air is gonna radicalize me, a person who assumes that every probability estimate is OF COURSE based on empirical data and real statistics

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@grimalkina @mrcompletely

The kind of “estimates” that get reported in media (including by science communicators) as “facts”. And then when they turn out to be inaccurate predictions (which, of course, because uncertainty), weaponized as “scientists are lying”

scottmatter, to ai
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

If can do our jobs, maybe it’s less about machines having human capabilities and more about those jobs being dehumanizing…

scottmatter, to random
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

Space seems to be three dimensional.

Is time one-dimensional?

https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-think-about-time-to-understand-your-hopes-and-regrets

ronanmcd, to climate
@ronanmcd@mastodon.green avatar

I actually saw a marketing claim today that a company's partner organisation, Dublin Airport, is carbon neutral since 2020.
These people are so stupid they have no idea no one is taken in by them. Dubin airport? With the planes? Carbon neutral? GTFO
#ClimateChange #carbon #transport

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@ronanmcd

Fine print likely says things like:

  • “airport” in this instance refers to the lighting and temperature control systems inside the terminal building

  • operational and supply-chain emissions from airlines and vendors who use Dublin airport are excluded from reporting as they are the sole responsibility of those airport users

gretared, to random
@gretared@sfba.social avatar

Apparently we are now calling personalization “AI” in meetings and goddamnit. Also I saw someone use LLM in a way that can only be interpreted as llama without vowels.

scottmatter,
@scottmatter@aus.social avatar

@gretared

I maintain that conditional formatting in excel is in fact AI.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Leos
  • rosin
  • ngwrru68w68
  • tacticalgear
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • everett
  • vwfavf
  • kavyap
  • megavids
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines