wjmaggos, to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

I think the future for most people on the is going to be an all-purpose account that lets them do everything. Have a feed, host files, display pics, engage in groups, post comments. What most people do with separate services, but in a "pod" that can move to any hosting service or domain you want. There could be a great market for providing these services and apps that interface with your data in unique ways. Professionals will have their own dedicated systems on the network.

wjmaggos, to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Been busy today and it looks like they're already gone, but I'm a lefty who strongly supports @newsmax. We should support everyone being on the and not block their instance as long as they are not harassing others or hosting many who do that. Especially journalists. It is not their job to conform to popular opinion or what everyone already agrees is true. Only those who push that line help us make progress. I want this place as open and popular as the .

wjmaggos, to apple
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Did announce anything related to decentralization?

wjmaggos, (edited ) to fediverse
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

What I want from the fedi is attention democracy. I want everyone using and everything on the internet layered with it. I want the public to decide what information, art and ideas go viral in the world, with no favor given to wealth or media ownership. That's my vision.

So while I want to welcome in to further this goal, I fear they are joining us just to try to co-opt it. IDK what to do next but spread the word about the revolution in culture that's possible here.

josemurilo, to random
@josemurilo@mato.social avatar

" pioneered a lot of the things we came to associate with the , including open APIs, , and social networking. It also implemeted sharing, which was not widely used at the time. Unfortunately, Flickr was acquired by Yahoo (for 22 million, which at the time was a lot), and while they didn’t ruin it, they certainly tried hard to do so."

https://mathewingram.com/work/index.php/2024/01/28/stewart-butterfield-and-slack-his-second-accidental-success-story/

judell, to fediverse
@judell@social.coop avatar

'"Better” for ActivityPub should mean, it helps more people connect to more other people they care about.'

https://social.coop/@evanprodromou@evanp.me/111189763373858332

wjmaggos, to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Still want to replace liberal.city with a server name and network of users that could be much bigger and stand for a fedi culture that wants everyone here, as long as they don't harass people. Unpopular opinions and facts not currently widely accepted welcome. Not otherwise branded with any specific ideology or community. Anybody else interested?

wjmaggos, to random

@barackobama

please turn on fediverse sharing. it will give you a bigger audience with minimal downsides. many people would like to follow you from the .

https://www.theverge.com/24107998/threads-fediverse-mastodon-how-to

rolle, to fediverse
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

People still can’t wrap their minds around the fact that the social networks in the Fediverse do not need excessive investor money to thrive.

wjmaggos, (edited ) to threads
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

whoa, hang on. I think this is the reason isn't fully federating yet. because the algo limits visibility of threads posts to threads users but not us, the vast majority of accounts would see a ton more interaction from other accounts than from other accounts. it would expose how much their algos serve and their top users over the interests of most users. I wonder if they saw that in their early testing.

cc @renwillis

https://mstdn.social/@renwillis/112209102930667255

wjmaggos, to random

@benedictevans

please turn on fediverse sharing. it will only give you a bigger audience. no downside. many people would like to follow you from the #SocialWeb.

https://www.theverge.com/24107998/threads-fediverse-mastodon-how-to

wjmaggos, to fediverse
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

right now I love . but something like a Personal Data Server that I can keep at home or pay somebody to manage, move whenever I want and connect to any new service that somebody develops, seems like the inevitable way forward. a blob with all my stuff as safe as I am willing pay for, where these companies are competing to be the most trustworthy and reliable. instead of having it spread out everywhere or with Google or Apple. and them pushing me to use their services.

shoq, to random
@shoq@mastodon.social avatar

Good morning . Let’s get social.

reiver, (edited ) to fediverse
@reiver@mastodon.social avatar

Oh look at that — BookWyrm gets mentioned in the Washington Post.

What is BookWyrm‽ —

BookWyrm is similar to Mastodon, in that it is an open-source'ish (with restrictions) social-networking platform for the Fediverse, BUT —

Rather than being about micro-blogging, BookWyrm is about books, tracking what you are reading, and sharing it with others.

Think GoodReads for the Fediverse.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/01/22/book-tracking-apps-review-goodreads-alternative/

@bookwyrm

youronlyone, to threads
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

This is the current plan and stance of / regarding enabling / for their users:

Personal analysis:

  • Since most users wouldn't understand what ActivityPub / Fediverse is, it is likely there will be far less than 40% or 30% (guesstimate) of their userbase who will appear in the Fediverse network.

  • It will highly depend on how they will explain the benefits of enabling ActivityPub in their accounts.

David, to fediverse

I strongly believe that our instance's admins shouldn't be deciding for us what platform we're allowed to federate with and what platform we're not.

wjmaggos, (edited ) to fediverse
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

If every article, podcast episode and video was natively an post, we'd need quote posts but want them to operate differently. They should count as a boost but with a clear indication that the person you are following also wants you to see their comment. How should that look? Maybe they wouldn't themselves be boostable...

toddalstrom, to lemmy
@toddalstrom@mastodon.social avatar

Looks like the has been widely used by the and communities for years, but now it's slowly being co-opted (including by staff) to refer to the of .

I predict a complete takeover of the , and term in general, before the end of 2024.

MrLee, to fediverse
@MrLee@aus.social avatar

Still looking for the best, quickest way to explain the to friends...

haubles, (edited ) to ai
@haubles@fosstodon.org avatar

This is probably the most exciting time to be an internet person, possibly since the 'net first blinked on.

How we experience the web is undergoing seismic shifts —, , and the will make for increasingly personal and engaging experiences, softening the borders between our digital and physical worlds.

And how we build for the web is changing, too.

....

youronlyone, to fediverse
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

What makes the lack of algorithms in the great? I get to see posts and talk with people all around the world.

You don't get that on with algorithms because they filter things for you, and you have no control over it.

Don't get me wrong, algorithms by itself are not bad. Just that, it is used in a way that limits your exposure (your posts to the world; and the world to you); and you have no control.

Another improper use of it is, like in 's case, they push as well as to control the narrative and shape people's minds and opinions.

devnull, (edited ) to fediverse
@devnull@crag.social avatar

A really cool thing about the (or ) is that there's so much still to codify and address.

Every so often a talking point about some protocol weakness is rehashed and debated — account portability, eventual consistency, inter-instance fueds, etc., and it really reminds me of when the was much younger, and there were so many more significant and novel things to address. The social web and is still so much more nascent than people give it credit for.

TimBoote, to internet

Interesting essay on that may resonate with other users. It left me wondering why I post at all and whether to vacate the

“Academics Soroush Vosoughi and Deb Roy, both of the MIT Media Lab, along with MIT Sloan professor Sinan Aral, recently conducted a study that reached the conclusion that false news spreads faster than the truth. Their research, published in Science, found that is ’70 percent more likely to be retweeted on than the ,’ and that the ‘reached 1,500 people about six times faster than the truth.'”

https://om.co/2023/10/15/social-internet-is-dead-get-used-to-it/

fromjason, to 11ty
@fromjason@mastodon.social avatar

I made a fun little site in . Put a splash page up for now. Go and give it a wave 👋

https://socialwe.blog/

shoq, to random
@shoq@mastodon.social avatar

Your morning meme of Zen, courtesy of the and > @GossiTheDog

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • magazineikmin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • osvaldo12
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • Leos
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines