pallenberg, to fediverse
@pallenberg@mastodon.social avatar

"Mozilla’s job is to prove that it’s possible to have a social network that feels good to be part of. Then help it grow to the size of the internet."

I love it!

https://www.theverge.com/23710406/mozilla-social-mastodon-fediverse-moderation

fedithom,
@fedithom@social.saarland avatar

@pallenberg THAT'S 's job?
Should have stuck to making a (LLM free) browser...

asahi95, to random

Was I too harsh on and ? :ms_thinking:

davidbisset, to fediverse
@davidbisset@phpc.social avatar

setting up shop on and trying to "reinvent content moderation".

"It’s a social network that doesn’t try to be neutral and isn’t attempting to preserve free speech. It’s trying to make the internet a nicer place to be."

@theverge

https://www.theverge.com/23710406/mozilla-social-mastodon-fediverse-moderation

christi3k, to random

I’m on vacation so I’m not going to prioritize explaining why in great detail, but has a shit track record when it comes to moderation and protecting vulnerable groups. Over my 4+ years there as an employee I was: proselytized to non-consensually, subject to anti-marriage equality propaganda, was told by a fellow employee who was subsequently promoted “my kind didn’t belong there”, and received death threats when I advocated for a code of conduct.

While I was there Mozilla launched a publication that invited Gamergate to share their side of the story.

Mozilla has always been behind the curve wrt inclusive community building. It’s possible they’ve come along way since. But Mitchell Baker is still at the head of the organization and IME, she’s one of the biggest blockers to progress.

This piece going around about Mozilla’s Fediverse instance and how they want to make the internet nice is a puff piece. There’s so real substance to it. Mozilla likes to make promises it has trouble following through on.

mastodonmigration, to random
@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online avatar

May 4, 2023

So, this is a big deal.

The Verge: ’s setting up shop on Mastodon and trying to reinvent content moderation >>> https://www.theverge.com/23710406/mozilla-social-mastodon-fediverse-moderation

"It’s a social network that doesn’t try to be neutral and isn’t attempting to preserve free speech. It’s trying to make the internet a nicer place to be."

"Mozilla’s content policies also make clear that the platform will err on the side of protecting people who need to be protected..."

chema, to random
@chema@sanfranciscan.org avatar

I am conflicted by @mozilla content policies announcement. I appreciate that a lot of thought went into it, but I think they could be used to eliminate a lot of necessary social tension.

An example is their violent content policy: “Users may not share content that depicts abuse of humans or animals, or that includes excessively gory or violent imagery that…can disturb other users.

I am a lifelong and I’ve been for 20 years. Photos of meat/dead animals disturb me. Am I to assume then that sharing this content will be banned in that instance? And if not, why not?

Also, nothing on who will be content. Is it volunteers, staff, external contractors??

https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/social-content-policies/

chema,
@chema@sanfranciscan.org avatar

Mozilla’s decision to outsource moderation of their Mastodon instance, thereby excluding workers from benefits and rights matter because @mozilla is a San Francisco-based . Their HQ is just three short blocks from me.

Poverty has exploded in San Francisco in the past few years. 1 in 9 children now live in poverty according to the 2023 Joint Venture Silicon Valley Index.

Content would be a great entry into the tech world and even more so if it was coupled with a fair wage and good benefits which, I reiterate, can and does offer to its workers.

I hope that @stevetex and his team can reconsider and bring moderation fully in-house, based in San Francisco and Bay Area where possible.

pcublogue, to fediverse French
@pcublogue@pkutalk.com avatar
jon, to fediverse
@jon@vivaldi.net avatar

introducing a server makes a lot of sense. Yes, we at @Vivaldi were first, but I welcome Mozilla.

With more companies joining and more media joining, Mastodon and the will grow and that is a very good thing.

Ready for the next wave?

Mars15, to fediverse

Exciting, @mozilla is now also launching their own instance! 👏 Currently as a private beta with a waiting list. Together with @medium, @Flipboard and @Vivaldi, that's quite a group of tech companies that believe in the future of and the . Hopefully this commitment will pay off in the long run and not be stopped by the hype around .

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-social-mastodon-private-beta-announcement/

cd24, to random
@cd24@sfba.social avatar

Excited to see testing the water in the fediverse. Welcome, and I'm excited to see them hosting an instance!

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-social-mastodon-private-beta-announcement/

tilvids, to random
@tilvids@mstdn.social avatar

The History of Mozilla Firefox :firefox:

(this video is a exclusive! If you enjoy, please consider sharing with others!)

https://tilvids.com/w/66L5SdKeQ6PY9ReKRGZSwZ

tilvids,
@tilvids@mstdn.social avatar

Note: I re-posted this video today in support of @social continuing to explore the fediverse and trying to be a champion of how a responsible organization should approach social media. Good on team and . :firefox:

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-social-mastodon-private-beta-announcement/

youronlyone, to fediverse
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

You can now join the waitlist to Mozilla.Social, Mozilla's 2nd instance.

https://prod.oidc-proxy.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net/waitlist

  • The first fediverse instance of Mozilla was 2010-02-22 to 2013-11-20. Its final name was “Social@Mozilla”.

david_senate, to fediverse

Who is interested in joining the private beta of Mozilla.social?

https://prod.oidc-proxy.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net/waitlist

maegul, to random
@maegul@hachyderm.io avatar
oblomov, to random
@oblomov@sociale.network avatar

While I agree with the @fsf warning about the emblematic value of the decision by to pull support for from , their article <https://u.fsf.org/3z8> is as empty as could be, especially considering that doesn't support JPEG XL either (being based on a branch that doesn't build support in.) You want to show that can do without? Do it by actually supporting what you complain Google is failing to.

oblomov,
@oblomov@sociale.network avatar

As I've already mentioned elsewhere (https://sociale.network/@oblomov/110073403788621333 http://wok.oblomov.eu/tecnologia/opera-requiem-3/ etc), much more so than 's abuse of its dominant position, the responsibility for the loss of the open web lies on the shoulder of the minority browsers. Why isn't shipping support in current releases of ? What about any other browser, or not, pretending to be interested in the ?

mozilla, to random

We are excited to announce that Fakespot will be joining the Mozilla family. Together we will expand Fakespot’s capabilities and continue to innovate new ways to create a better online shopping experience for people, one where they can feel safe and confident they are purchasing the best, most trustworthy products. Firefox is committed to making people’s lives better online and we know Fakespot’s expertise will help us deliver an even better ecommerce experience. https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/fakespot-joins-mozilla-firefox-shopping-announcement/

downey,
@downey@floss.social avatar

@mozilla

⌛ 6 years and counting since promised to release under an license.

🤨 Will get the same false promises?

eferis, to tech
@eferis@mastodon.social avatar

Anyone knows if there’s a extension that allows you to add some sort of black square overlay on any video to hide parts you don’t wish to see (ads, on-screen chats etc.)?

asahi95, to random

I pretty much can't use due to the poor decisions keeps making over the past few years, and at the moment I rather not stick around

At this current moment, I'm pretty much set on completely switching to

stanford,

@asahi95 Even tho I understand your issues with the "recent" decisions from , for me isn't really an alternative. In general my dislike of all those chrome skins is still bigger than that of .

asahi95, to random

needs to screw their heads on and fix . Legitimately.

thunderbird, to random
@thunderbird@mastodon.online avatar

Thank you for the recent surge of ideas at Mozilla Connect. Have you checked out the newest suggestions?

https://connect.mozilla.org/t5/ideas/idb-p/ideas/label-name/thunderbird/tab/most-recent

Vote on the ones you believe in, and discuss them too.

Linux, to linux
@Linux@linuxrocks.online avatar

The official Firefox snap package evolves - updating boost :firefox:

The official snapped Mozilla Firefox - enables running the browser more securely in a sandbox.

New snacks to the pack of foxes lately?

  • Multi-thread CPU decompression reduced Firefox start up time alot

  • Canonical (Ubuntu) implemented a new streamlined update (also for ALL desktop snaps)

  • Spellcheck dictionary integration

  • Firefox PDF font rendering

  • Firefox is the last hope for a non-Google browser

All of it => https://snapcraft.io/blog/firefox-snap-updates-and-upgrades

#Firefox #browsers #Linux #Mozilla #Canonical #Ubuntu #Snap #PDF #desktop #web

jbzfn, to programming
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

「 Most of us, if we found ourselves trudging up 21 flights of stairs, would just get pissed off and leave it there. But Hoare decided to do something about it. He opened his laptop and began designing a new computer language, one that he hoped would make it possible to write small, fast code without memory bugs. He named it Rust, after a group of remarkably hardy fungi that are, he says, “over-engineered for survival.” 」
@techreview


https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/02/14/1067869/rust-worlds-fastest-growing-programming-language

jbzfn, (edited )
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

⎧ In 2009, Mozilla decided to officially sponsor Rust. The language would be open source, and accountable only to the people making it, but Mozilla was willing to bootstrap it by paying engineers. A Rust group took over a conference room at the company; Dave Herman, cofounder of Mozilla Research, dubbed it “the nerd cave” and posted a sign outside the door. Over the next 10 years, Mozilla employed over a dozen engineers to work on Rust full time, Hoare estimates ⎭

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines