GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Republican megadonor paid private boarding school tuition for the grandnephew of Justice , according to report Thursday in ProPublica that was likely to bring a fresh round of scrutiny to both Thomas and the ethics practices at the nation's highest court.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/05/04/clarence-thomas-relative-received-tuition-from-gop-donor-harlan-crow/70182450007/

shiruken, to politics

Clarence Thomas raised his grandnephew "like a son" and sent him to private boarding schools in Virginia and Georgia.

Harlan Crow paid the tuition. The price tag could have exceeded $150,000.

https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-private-school-tuition-scotus

rgulick, to random
@rgulick@social.coop avatar

It's becoming clear that entire life has been one big grift.

WarnerCrocker, to random
@WarnerCrocker@mastodon.social avatar

I see we’re now going to debate the “legal” definition of what is and isn’t a “dependant child.”

When you can use the law to do something wrong legally you’ve hit the jackpot.

ProPublica, to random
@ProPublica@newsie.social avatar

Clarence Thomas Had a Child in Private School. Harlan Crow Paid the Tuition.

The billionaire GOP megadonor paid for private school for a relative Thomas said he was raising “as a son.”

“This is way outside the norm,” said a former White House ethics lawyer.

https://www.propublica.org/article/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-private-school-tuition-scotus?utm_medium=social&utm_source=mastodon&utm_campaign=mastodon-post

rbreich, to random
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

RT @4TaxFairness
BREAKING: Harlan Crow and his family's average yearly political contributions went up 862% after Citizens United was decided in 2010.

Who provided a deciding vote for that case?

Justice Clarence Thomas, a "family friend" they showered with luxury travel and gifts for 20+ years.

Bullix,

@rbreich

Don't forget he was ALSO the 5th vote to gut Section 4 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act.

You know, the one that required states with a history of disenfranchising minorities to seek approval of proposed changes to their voting laws.

Which opened the gates for the kind of voter suppression efforts now rampant in the red states.

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"No employee of the federal government, that I’m aware of, is allowed to accept these kinds of gifts. If [Clarence] Thomas was in the House, if he was in the Senate, if he was in the White House, if he was anywhere else in government, this would not be allowed. If he was a lower court judge, this would not be allowed. And frankly, he should resign over this."

~ Ian Milhiser

https://www.democracynow.org/2023/5/3/supreme_court_corruption_scandal

annhattan, to random

" has publicly stated his failure to comply with the law by disclosing his financial entanglements with are unintended errors, but if so, it's a mistake remarkably consistent with his ideological position that people who use their money and influence to steer the system ought to be able to do so in complete secrecy." - /

https://bit.ly/410pz6v

pbump, to random
@pbump@journa.host avatar

The Supreme Court has two legitimacy issues: it's bogged down in the partisan muck, which may not be fixable, and Clarence Thomas's longstanding issues are helping keep it there. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/02/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-partisanship/

ZhiZhu,
@ZhiZhu@newsie.social avatar

"“The ethical conduct of the has been under growing scrutiny,” Emmarie Huetteman wrote. “Questions have been raised over Justice ’ appearances before Republican-backed groups and his acceptance of favors from a contributor in Texas, ...”

Huetteman hasn’t worked for the Times since 2017. So how’d she capture the current gestalt so accurately? Because it hasn’t changed since 2011, when she wrote the passage above."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/02/supreme-court-clarence-thomas-partisanship/

Some_Emo_Chick, to politics
@Some_Emo_Chick@mastodon.social avatar
BruceMirken, to random
@BruceMirken@mas.to avatar
DemLabs, to random
@DemLabs@newsie.social avatar

Follow the money behind the US Supreme Court corruption with this 'relationship map'. https://thedemlabs.org/2023/04/29/follow-the-money-behind-supreme-court-corruption/

NewsDesk, to politics
@NewsDesk@flipboard.social avatar

Two U.S. senators unveil bipartisan proposal to require Supreme Court to adopt code of conduct.

The Hill has the latest on the recent revelations that Justice Clarence Thomas failed to disclose gifts from a wealthy businessman: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/3972535-senators-unveil-bipartisan-proposal-to-require-supreme-court-to-adopt-code-of-conduct/

DoesntExist,

@NewsDesk
Hot take: it's already a felony to bribe a judge.

Simply apply the law, and call these "gifts" of millions of dollars by someone who had business before the court what they are:

Bribes

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

The first? There should have been way more before this, but, sigh, okay, & kudos to him:

"On Monday, Senator Ed Markey became the first senator to call for to resign.

“I will say what needs to be said: Clarence Thomas should resign from the of US. His reputation is unsalvageable. It is evident that he cannot judge right from wrong, so why should he be judging the country’s most important cases on the highest court?” https://newrepublic.com/post/172189/democratic-senator-becomes-first-call-clarence-thomas-resign

Olyindivisible, to random
@Olyindivisible@pnw.zone avatar
GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

“A company related to Republican megadonor , a longtime friend of who paid for lavish trips for the justice and his wife, had business before the Supreme Court in the mid-2000s, records show.”

https://www.cnn.com/2023/04/25/politics/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-supreme-court

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Justice said he was advised he didn’t have to disclose luxuries paid for by GOP donor because Crow “did not have business before the court.” But in at least one case, Crow did: Bloomberg

https://breaking.iavian.net/article/335072

wdlindsy, to random
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"I think it would be positively disgraceful if [John Roberts] refuses to speak - testify- in front of Congress [about Clarence Thomas], It would be a real statement that the Supreme Court justices view themselves as rulers instead of public servants.

"They owe us a response, they owe us transparency."

~ Walter Schaub


/1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xge_GxHBeAM

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via @emptywheel:

This is the kind of ineptitude that would sink even an impeachment backed with [hypothetical] evidence of direct bribery.

Josh Gerstein:

NEW: Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin says he didn't invite Justice to testify re ethics because he thought Thomas would ignore the invitation.

morgan, to random
@morgan@sfba.social avatar
jeffjarvis, to random
@jeffjarvis@mastodon.social avatar

"There is some real chutzpah."
The Supreme Court delivers a sigh of relief — and an outrageous dissent https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/22/alito-mifepristone-supreme-court-abortion/

bespacific,
@bespacific@newsie.social avatar

@jeffjarvis has gotten the attention of late due to questionable ethics. But it’s high time received the scrutiny he deserves. Alito’s in the case has served up yet another example of his , . and would have allowed the by a panel of the for the to stand. NoPeace

GottaLaff, to random
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Do it.

Via @emptywheel:

Subpoena Clarence, then.

CNN Politics:

Chief Justice John Roberts has declined to directly respond to a congressional request for his testimony at a ethics hearing next month about Justice ’ alleged ethical lapses.

Nonilex, to random
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

preserves access to key drug as appeal proceeds

on Fri preserved full access for now to that has been taken by millions of women… (for >20 years), its first major abortion-related decision since overturning ’s constitutional guarantee of last year.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/21/mifepristone-abortion-pill-access-supreme-court/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

put on hold a… ruling in favor of antiabortion groups, which said the was wrong to make… more widely available. A legal battle over whether to permanently reimpose restrictions, & whether the FDA had properly approved use of the drug…, will continue.
…the majority did not explain its reasoning…. In the only noted dissents, Justices & said they would not have granted the Biden admin’s request for a stay of the decision by… the .

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

did not explain his reasoning. said the admin & the public would not have been harmed by agreeing w/the lower court….
“It would simply restore the circumstances that existed (& that the Government defended) from 2000 to 2016 under three Presidential administrations,” Alito wrote.

(Except during those years women had the protections granted - duh)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines