I was looking for an answer to the simple question, how large is the trained GPT4 model in Gigabyte, terribly hard to find some estimate ? 🤔 #AI#GPT4#size
Gemini advanced was really awful, but seems to be improving (i am using it side-by-side with ChatGPT4).
Interesting, probably people hard at work in the background. #AI#GeminiAdvanced#ChatGPT#GPT4
If you saw the example footage of #Sora recently and thought, "Pfft, it's just #AIvideo garbage. Can't do sound, narration, and all the other stuff you need, so there!"
You can do all of that, VERY easily now. 15 minutes and I was able to get #aimusic from Google music labs. The narration is my voice reading a script #GPT4 made for me and then Speech2Speech being used on #ElevenLabs to get some star power.
Folks, give me two hours and I could get you a 10 minute doc.
Een simpele vraag waar Gemini Advanced bij faalt, maar GPT4 niet, "wat is zwaarder een kilo veren of een pond lood ?" , bizar als je bedenkt hoeveel geld, mankracht en onderzoek er achter Google Gemini zit #gemini#gpt4
The research group of Pascal Hitzler analyzed GPT-4 from a psychological point of view. and gained some interesting results:
Adrita Barua, Gary Brase, Ke Dong, Pascal Hitzler, Eugene Vasserman, "On the Psychology of GPT-4: Moderately anxious, slightly masculine, honest, and humble" https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01777
It''s amazing that #ChatGPT would let me win a game of tic-tac-toe because...
"In games like tic-tac-toe, my responses are often guided by the goal of providing an engaging and enjoyable experience, rather than purely focusing on winning. My primary aim is to interact with you in a way that is entertaining and interesting."
💡 GPT-5: il CEO di OpenAI conferma lo sviluppo di miglioramenti per ChatGPT
Le dichiarazioni di Sam Altman svelano i piani di OpenAI per la prossima versione del chatbot
Half of my traffic on Moliere.love now comes from Bing.
Since 1) nobody really uses Bing and 2) Bing is the default search engine behind GPT4,
my guess is that this extra new Bing traffic is a side effect of online searches in GPT4
There are differences between GPT4 used with Bing and GPT4 used in the paid version of ChatGPT.
ChatGPT (GPT4, paid version) is able to read this image and fully translate it, which is quite impressive in my view. Interestingly Bard also does a good job , it seems better in translation then ChatGPT https://g.co/bard/share/454464de0e4f #ChatGPT#GoogleBard#Bing#GPT4#GenerativeAI#multimodal
I can honestly say that #OpenAI has made my life better this year in a small, but significant way. 💖 I can ‘share’ any image on my iPhone to #BeMyEyes and almost instantly get a very detailed description back in seconds. 📱✨
It might not always be completely accurate, but believe me when I say it is the single biggest thing to help in 38 years of being blind! 🌟 #Accessibility#AI#AISoftheBlind#Blind#ComputerVision#Disability#GPT4#Innovation#MachineLearning
GPT4 (betaalde versie) , lost deze wiskundepuzzel op die ik als plaatje (!) verstrek. In de beantwoording kwam het eerst tot een fout (negatief) antwoord maar corrigeerde zichzelf tijdens de beantwoording om tot het goede antwoord van 50 minuten te komen. #experimenteren#GPT4
On Monday, Mistral AI announced a new AI language model called Mixtral 8x7B, a "mixture of experts" (MoE) model with open weights that reportedly truly matches OpenAI's GPT-3.5 in performance—an achievement that has been claimed by others in the past but is being taken seriously by AI heavyweights such as OpenAI's Andrej...
“What we are going to see, in the fullness of time, I promise you, is that #Gemini is more or less in the same ball park as #GPT4, handy for a bunch of things, but untethered in reality, still with dicey, unpredictable reasoning, and a very limited understanding of the world. Don’t let the PR fool you”
#AI#GenerativeAI#Chatbots#GPT4#Eliza#TuringTest: "The experiment involved 652 participants who completed a total of 1,810 sessions, of which 1,405 games were analyzed after excluding certain scenarios like repeated AI games (leading to the expectation of AI model interactions when other humans weren't online) or personal acquaintance between participants and witnesses, who were sometimes sitting in the same room.
Surprisingly, ELIZA, developed in the mid-1960s by computer scientist Joseph Weizenbaum at MIT, scored relatively well during the study, achieving a success rate of 27 percent. GPT-3.5, depending on the prompt, scored a 14 percent success rate, below ELIZA. GPT-4 achieved a success rate of 41 percent, second only to actual humans.
GPT-3.5, the base model behind the free version of ChatGPT, has been conditioned by OpenAI specifically not to present itself as a human, which may partially account for its poor performance. In a post on X, Princeton computer science professor Arvind Narayanan wrote, "Important context about the 'ChatGPT doesn't pass the Turing test' paper. As always, testing behavior doesn't tell us about capability." In a reply, he continued, "ChatGPT is fine-tuned to have a formal tone, not express opinions, etc, which makes it less humanlike. The authors tried to change this with the prompt, but it has limits. The best way to pretend to be a human chatting is to fine-tune on human chat logs.""
Everybody’s talking about Mistral, an upstart French challenger to OpenAI (arstechnica.com)
On Monday, Mistral AI announced a new AI language model called Mixtral 8x7B, a "mixture of experts" (MoE) model with open weights that reportedly truly matches OpenAI's GPT-3.5 in performance—an achievement that has been claimed by others in the past but is being taken seriously by AI heavyweights such as OpenAI's Andrej...