jwildeboer, (edited ) to ipv6
@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net avatar

If you want to make sure that a lot of small e-mail servers (like mine) will not reach your e-mail server, because you really hate us folks trying to keep e-mail decentralised, just use the CSS blocklist by . This will greatly reduce your exposure to the even weirder small admins (like me) that try to use . Throw in UCEPROTECTL3 and/or L2 too to exclude us running our small, well-maintained mail servers at ISPs on small VPS or dedicated servers.

fabio, to random
@fabio@manganiello.social avatar

I’ve decided to go full-in with my own mail server. The bridge over SSH+VPN tunnel is no substitute for a proper mail server - plus it’s awfully slow when used as a full IMAP server and it breaks the IMAP implementation in a lot of ways.

I’ve created my new domain, gone through the configuration of DKIM/DMARC/SPF like a good postmaster, just to get immediately blacklisted by @spamhaus on my first outbound email.

I’ve been through this before, but in my previous experiences a blacklist removal ticket would be either resolved automatically or within a couple of hours at most.

In this case, nearly 24h and three tickets later and nothing is moving. Not even some directions on how to get removed or an ETA. The mailboxes have already been all migrated with forwarding configured on the old addresses, but outbound email is still broken because being blacklisted by a single company means being unable to communicate with nearly any mail servers out there.

Does anyone have any tips on how a blacklist removal process can be sped up?

djsumdog,
@djsumdog@djsumdog.com avatar

You really just got to send more e-mail and then ask your friends to mark it as "not-spam" .. is probably the least you have to worry about. I run my own e-mail server as well:

https://battlepenguin.com/tech/upgrading-opensmtpd-6.3-and-running-e-mail-in-docker/

...and I wrote this back in 2015 on the whole "marked as spam" issue:

https://battlepenguin.com/tech/how-google-and-microsoft-made-email-unreliable/

There's an older article that's gone now (you can sometimes find it in an archive) titled "The hostile e-mail landscape"

After a few years with my e-mail on Hetzer, most of it seems to get through now. mail-tester.com is a pretty decent checking tool.

nixCraft, to random
@nixCraft@mastodon.social avatar

The article talks about using poor password attack vectors. just clickbait. And What do you mean again? The bots never stopped. The scanning never stopped. Here is a guide to protect your openssh https://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-unix-bsd-openssh-server-best-practices.html

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@nixCraft Eeyupp...

That's why one has to use very aggressively as well as blocklists AND ideally pubkey-based auth.

I mean, I do pull a lot of blocklists on top of that because there is no legitimate reason not to use blocklists...

https://github.com/greyhat-academy/lists.d/blob/main/blocklists.list.tsv

yakkoj, to random
@yakkoj@fosstodon.org avatar

I've got 4 copies of this fucking refund scam in my inbox.

obviously forged headers and body of refund scam email.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@yakkoj I'd report these to and tell them to fix their shit or you'd escalate that to and let them burn their domain...

That usually gets hosters up and running...

serenebabe, to random
@serenebabe@mastodon.social avatar

all of a sudden I can't email my parents because is blocking me. I can't remove myself from spamhaus' blocklist because I get an error when I check to see if I'm on their blocklist. UGH.

frehi, to CSS
@frehi@fosstodon.org avatar

If you are a , please make sure you don't use to block e-mail. This list blocks whole /64 ipv6 subnets, while providers like only hand out single IP addresses /128 on their VPS's. That means that CSS is blocking systems of unrelated and innocent users.

r000t, to random
@r000t@fosstodon.org avatar

The Associated Press just served me an ad for fake anti-virus. The entire page was taken over, and forwarded to the malicious site, within seconds of opening the news article, every time.

An ad blocker isn't just something to hide some annoying eyesores, it's a vital layer of security.

If you have friends or family who might fall for fake AV or "windows technical the department" scams, they need an ad blocker. No site they visit can be considered "safe" unless it simply doesn't have ads.

video/mp4

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar
itsecbot, to random
@itsecbot@schleuss.online avatar

Tech CEO Sentenced to 5 Years in IP Address Scheme - Amir Golestan, the 40-year-old CEO of the Charleston, S.C. based technology compan... https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/10/tech-ceo-sentenced-to-5-years-in-ip-address-scheme/ -do-wellnews .0

beandev, to random German
@beandev@social.tchncs.de avatar

Was soll das?

mindfactory.de zeigt das an:

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@schattendasein @beandev

Und ja, blockiert zeugs random und ohne wirksamen Widerspruch oder Moderation...

Anders als ist es auch keine automatische Entfernung nach Cooldown oder so...
https://social.tchncs.de/@beandev/111222682399969650

briankrebs, (edited ) to random

Why is the .US domain -- the country code top-level domain (ccTLD) for the United States -- consistently among the most prevalent in phishing domains?

And why is this okay, when other ccTLDs that also restrict registration to residents/citizens don't seem to have this problem? And when a fair number of .US domains are used to attack US government agencies? Today's story explores these questions:

Domain names ending in “.US” — the top-level domain for the United States — are among the most prevalent in phishing scams, new research shows. This is noteworthy because .US is overseen by the U.S. government, which is frequently the target of phishing domains ending in .US. Also, .US domains are only supposed to be available to U.S. citizens and to those who can demonstrate that they have a physical presence in the United States.

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2023/09/why-is-us-being-used-to-phish-so-many-of-us/

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@hackbyte @briankrebs yeah, but to go back to the point: is a big issue and 99,9% of all Spam that isn't bring 'd by blocklists are from , , / .com / / and domains hosted by registrars like , because , , and the Registrars refuse to even process at all.

kkarhan, to random
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

Apparently the has chosen an open pit mine for hate as their "hill to die on"...
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/isps-should-not-police-online-speech-no-matter-how-awful-it

Because there is no valid reason to ever defend and has the right to [) traffic to them for all the valid reasons...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiwi_Farms

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@olives @KelsonV @eff you don't get it, do you?

  1. isn'a a Tier-1 and even if they were, there is no legal mandate for them to accept anything or provide services to anyone.
    Espechally since there's no legally enforceable :loading: nor are they regulated as a "utility service" with "must provide" clauses.

  2. Providers are already very twitchy and they'll block entire ASNs if they get listed by .

  3. is indefensible thus invalid discussion.

olives, to random
@olives@qoto.org avatar
kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@olives nah.

It's an act of self-defense against an ASN that is a ""...

If you think that's the first time or the only reason haven't 'd them or any other network, then you ignore the existance of for decades.

https://mstdn.social/@kkarhan/110987470524664901

“view context” broken b̶e̶c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶ (and) lemmy.world has just joined Cloudflare (unrelated)

I was trying to work out why it is that when I receive a notification and I click “view context” nothing happens if the msg came from lemmy.world. The screen blinks for a second but gives no prior posts. Well after digging into this, I see that #lemmyWorld has just recently joined the exclusive #walledGarden of Cloudflare....

diyrebel, (edited ) to lemmy_support in “view context” broken b̶e̶c̶a̶u̶s̶e̶ (and) lemmy.world has just joined Cloudflare (unrelated)

I’d just like to know what your solution to DDOS and other bad actors is if it’s not cloudflare.

First of all DDoS from Tor is rarely successful because the Tor network itself does not have the bandwidth with so few exit nodes. But if nonetheless you have an attack from Tor you stand up an onion host and forward all Tor traffic from the clearnet site to the onion site. Then regardless of where the attack is coming from, on the clearnet side there are various tar-pitting techniques to use on high-volume suspect traffic. You can also stand up a few VPS servers and load balance them, similar to what Cloudflare does without selling everyone else’s soul to the US tech giant devil.

on something cloudflare already does extremely well.

CF does the job very poorly. The problem is you’re discounting availability to all users as a criteria. You might say solves the spam problem “very well” if you neglect the fact that no one can any longer run their own home server on a residential IP and that it’s okay for mail to traverse the likes of Google & MS. A good anti-spam tool detects the spam without falsely shit-canning ham. This is why SpamHaus and Cloudflare do a poor job: they marginalize whole communities and treat their ham as spam.

A walled garden means there’s actual barriers to entry. Cloudflare isn’t a barrier to entry unless you’re planning to attack an instance

Yes to your first statement. Your 2nd statement is nonsense. The pic on the OP proves I hit a barrier to entry without “planning an attack”

or are using something like ToR

Tor users are only one legit community that Cloudflare marginalizes. People in impoverished areas have to use cheap ISPs who issue CGNAT IP addresses, which CF is also hostile toward. CF is also bot-hostile, which includes hostility toward beneficial bots as well as non-bots who appear as bots to CF’s crude detection (e.g. text browsers).

kkarhan, to email
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

- - Adressen gehören in meinen Augen ausnahmslos verboten!

Die einzu legitimen No-Reply - eMails sind firmen- /organisationsinterne Benachrichtigungen von Monitoring-Lösungen.

No-Reply - eMail - Adressen, erst recht wenn diese nicht als solche ersichtlich sind [bspw. service@...] sind ein absoluter Arschloch-Move!

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@Commander_KEEN @verbraucherzentrale Und dabei hab' ich schon die -|en drin!
https://github.com/greyhat-academy/lists.d/blob/main/blocklists.list.tsv

Ich selbst bin ja am "bespammten Ende"...

adlerweb, to threads German
@adlerweb@social.adlerweb.info avatar

Die ersten Instanzen blockieren . Einer der Gründe, warum ich selbst was hoste. Ich möchte gerne selbst bestimmen, mit wem ich föderiere und mit wem nicht. Ja, da wird viel Unfug her kommen, aber eben auch ein paar schwer zu ersetzende Quellen. Diese in Sippenhaft zu nehmen ist IMO kontraproduktiv. Insbesondere bei einer "Instanz", die mehr Nutzer haben wird, als der Rest des Feediverse. Oder dann halt Feedibubble.

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@adlerweb ich halte das für naiv (anders als Blockaden von :activitypub: - Instanzen, denn wird wie ein dauerhafter -Angriff alles (außer vielleicht wenige -Instanzen) lahmlegen.

Das ist genauso wie - Server aufsetzen und keinerlei alla nutzen...

mspro, to random German

mir scheint, dass es ein traditionslinker fehlschluss ist, zu glauben, dass interoperabilität etwas mit bündniskultur, allliertentum oder sowas zu tun hat oder haben muss. das gute an protokollen ist doch, dass sie eben völlig agnostisch gegenüber den sie einsetzenden personen oder von ihnen übertragenen inhalten sind. daher sind metas intentionen gegenüber dem fediverse oder ihr moralisch-politischer kompass an dieser stelle völlig egal. https://mastodon.opalium.net/@opalium/110655863321874829

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@mspro Wir sehen das Problem schon bei wo mit / , / und .com / drei Großkonzerne allen deren absurde Regeln aufzwingen, sich selbst aber an keine halten müssen, und dementsprechend für 99,99% allen |s verantwortlich sind, der nicht automagisch per weggeblockt wird!

https://social.tchncs.de/@mspro/110656363513876724

YourAnonRiots, to linux Japanese
@YourAnonRiots@mstdn.social avatar

Urgent action required!

Internet-facing systems and IoT devices are under attack! Discover how threat actors hijack SSH credentials, deploy backdoors and mining .

https://thehackernews.com/2023/06/new-cryptocurrency-mining-campaign.html

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@YourAnonRiots The best and simplest way is to restrict to authorized keys only, disable password logins and fail2ban IPs when they try to brute-force access...

You may also employ [network-wide] blocklists like the :
https://github.com/greyhat-academy/lists.d/blob/main/blocklists.list.tsv

mastodonmigration, to random
@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online avatar

Clarification

You do not have to worry about your mastodon.social (m.s) account being defederated.

There is a well meaning, but misleading post currently promoted that suggests you should move your m.s account because:

  1. "Instance admins are considering defederating them"
  2. "Their admin is making spam accounts easier to create."

Very few, if any, instances are considering blocking m.s, and the recent spam attacks are worthy of sober discussion, not hyperbole. [more]

1/

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@mastodonmigration @profcarroll

  1. I'm not scaring anyone.

  2. I see the problem that the :fediverse: is centralizing in a single instance like mastodon.social :mastodon: as a real issue.

  3. Just like 's denylistings, such community self-defense actions are dynamic and not 100% permanent...

  4. It's good to see being not just frowned upon, but actually acted upon.

atomicpoet, to internet
@atomicpoet@mastodon.social avatar

Hey @gruber, how will be tangibly different from Mastodon?

Because with what Bluesky devs are telling me, defederation with AT protocol should be possible.

It would be incredible on Bluesky’s part if a server couldn’t defederate.

https://mastodon.social/@gruber/110328355532624579

kkarhan,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@atomicpoet @gruber according to that logic, is doomed because exists.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • tester
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • slotface
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines