lffontenelle, to random
@lffontenelle@mastodon.social avatar

The new issue of the R Journal has article on openalexR: https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2023-089

generalising, to ChatGPT
@generalising@mastodon.flooey.org avatar

I have a preprint out estimating how many scholarly papers are written using chatGPT etc? I estimate upwards of 60k articles (>1% of global output) published in 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.16887

How can we identify this? Simple: there are certain words that LLMs love, and they suddenly start showing up a lot last year. Twice as many papers call something "intricate", big rises for "commendable" and "meticulous".

#bibliometrics #scholcomm #chatgpt

fr, to Futurology

’s embrace of free platform shakes up academic

👉 Paris university’s ‘radical decision’ to join challenges for-profit providers

https://www.ft.com/content/89098b25-78af-4539-ba24-c770cf9ec7c3

mgiven, to ai

"Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023"

The AI Index Report tracks, collates, distills, and visualizes data related to artificial intelligence. .. The report aims to be the world’s most credible and authoritative source for data and insights about AI.

This is a great, well-sourced 386 page monograph, comparable to an almanac in its comprehensiveness.

There are Youtube videos available discussing the findings at great length.

https://browse.arxiv.org/pdf/2310.03715.pdf

matherion, to random
@matherion@mastodon.nl avatar

Dear fellow enthusiasts, experts, , and other people who work regularly with bibliographic databases (e.g. PsycINFO, EmBase, PubMed, etc) and interfaces (e.g. by Ovid, Ebsco, etc) 👋

Our library recently decided to discontinue licenses for EmBase, Cinahl, and Cochrane.

What I missed when deciding is an overview of overlap between these databases and others (e.g. PubMed).

Does this exist?

I can't imagine nobody has built this yet? 🤔

[please boost!🙏]

petersuber, (edited ) to MandelaEffect
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

This article argues that "a simplistic reinterpretation of DORA" (but not DORA itself) is guilty of "bibliometric denialism".
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04787-2
()


brembs, to mastodon
@brembs@mastodon.social avatar

What do these developments have in common?

They are all steps towards replacing academic journals
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230206
with interoperable, not-for-profit infrastructures based on and
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230207

kdnyhan, to medlibs
@kdnyhan@social.esmarconf.org avatar

In which bibliographic databases can I search/filter by the institution of the first author?

  • PubMed via API if I play around with XML a bit
  • what else?

@medlibs

davidjamesweir, to physics

Your regular reminder that papers by women are undercited in relative to those by men...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09047
... so please don't use citation for anything that matters. 🙏

rhaunschild, to random German

Pleased to see the positive and constructive reviews for my @sti2023 conference paper about policy impact in cooperation with @bornmann and Kate Williams:
https://dapp.orvium.io/deposits/6440f44400950d7e328907b2/view

EASE, to random
@EASE@mstdn.science avatar

Journal performance beyond the . Cristina Huidiu at Elsevier (a former librarian) says responsible use of metrics - article metrics, journal metrics, & - can be business indicators to help publishers to make decisions.

Can get insights into impact beyond citations and trends in fields, from patents and funding.

Collaboration patterns of existing authors can show new directions of their work.

How can further context help • Funding data gives early indications of: - Funders changing focus towards specific disciplines - Universities (and researchers) working of topics before publications are planned Patent portfolio shows focus. Any interesting outliers?

petersuber, (edited ) to internet
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Early in the pandemic (April 2020) I started what became a long thread on in academic .
https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1252981139855355904

Starting today, I'm stopping it on Twitter and continuing it on .

Here's a rollup of the complete Twitter thread.
https://resee.it/tweet/1252981139855355904

Here's a nearly complete archived version in the @waybackmachine.
https://web.archive.org/web/20220908134128/https://twitter.com/petersuber/status/1252981139855355904

Watch this space for updates.


@academicchatter

🧵

petersuber, (edited )
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Update. This qualification applies to all the studies I've collected in this thread: "Different research does not understand the concepts of 'man/woman' and 'male/female' in the same way, and there is no discussion nor written consensus on how to tackle these issues ethically and correctly within ."
https://digibug.ugr.es/bitstream/handle/10481/88251/Gender1.pdf

Another qualification: Most of these studies determine the sex/gender of authors by using software that makes guesses based on their names.

ct_bergstrom, to science
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

Intro post: I'm a professor of at the . My training is in , , , and . I did lots of work in and . I teach . These days I spend a lot of time thinking about the spread of , the , and . I do a lot of and love , , and all .

For your trouble, here's a perfect crow.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • tacticalgear
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • everett
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • lostlight
  • All magazines