From @gruber on Google adding AI GIGO (garbage in, garbage out) to their search results:
"They’ve turned Google Search — the crown jewel of the company, arguably the greatest consumer product ever made — into the butt of jokes."
If facts and hard data are required, folding in AI is like a truth diluting virus. Once the AI learns about adding glue to pizza, there's no simple way to exorcise that "fact".
😮
"Samsung requires independent repair shops to give Samsung the name, contact information, phone identifier, and customer complaint details of everyone who gets their phone repaired at these shops"
And:
"it also requires these nominally independent shops to “immediately disassemble” any phones that customers have brought them that have been previously repaired with aftermarket or third-party parts"
@davemark Apple's keyboard will be virtual. People who can't learn to touch type on a bare table or in the air will have to get the new Apple Vision Air glasses that will also be foldable - just like my current glasses.
@davemark I don't think Apple will make a foldable-screen Mac. iPad, maybe. iOS (/iPadOS) already adapts from tall and narrow to wide, so it makes sense that iOS apps would be able to run folded (iPhone form factor) or open (iPad).
I think Macs will continue to be computers, not touch-first interface. Or at the very least, a traditional single screen and physical keyboard clamshell model will continue to be offered.
"A judge blocks the foreclosure sale of Elvis' Graceland, after his heir alleges fraud"
A fascinating story, but what got me was the bit about Graceland being valued at $400 million. For 14 acres. That's about $28M per acre. That's approaching mid-town-Manhattan prices.
This how much Elvis was revered? Still an amazing draw? Can't think of any other person whose home has so much value.
@mlanger Great question. It's all speculation at this point, but presumably, when and if pricing is laid out, there will be a compelling case made to shell out for AI.
@designatednerd I added a screenshot to my original post. Take a look. For sure that’s the source, and I can understand how someone could make that mistake, this is a bad result on Google part, and I’m guessing it also feeds into and educates their AI.