It's probably best not to engage with dead-enders who'd rather watch society burn than be adults & vote for #Biden, or at least try to persuade rather than scold. But it's so damn frustrating they haven't already figured out at this late date that #Trump is an existential threat.
It's a valid point. But sometimes I think it's worth engaging with them for others to see. It's exhausting, but I think it's good when non-participating observers see that they get pushback.
(I might be flattering myself there, and maybe I just can't avoid an argument, but it might be right.)
Hey yall looking fo mo folks to fck with on dis app. I joined mastodon when I saw it trending when twitter was burning.
This shit good 👍🏾 but I want to fck with more interesting people. Like fun bad shit no I'm saying? 😄
Hit me up yall so I can follow yall back.
Love Jaden xxx #introduction#introductions#blackmastodon#blackfediverse ❤️❤️
I'm just an old fuck, so not what you're looking for (I spend waaay too much Mastodon time on politics), but I hope you find folks. We need more people doing fun bad shit around here
"They want to prove they are independent of liberals & their own readers—who happen to be the same people. The Times equates independence with making us unhappy. Jay Rosen spotted that dynamic years ago. That—and petulance—is what drives The Times to #ButHerEmails and now #ButHisAge." https://medium.com/whither-news/the-times-is-broken-02a4a6a27f8c
Sorry, but "the view from nowhere" doesn't work. Everybody's got a perspective, and even the decision of what to investigate and what to report involves a judgment based on how you think the world should be.
Heck, the Times' decision to flood the zone with shit about how "Biden is old" (which he is) and barely mention how "Trump is showing signs of dementia" (which he is) shows how "just the facts" can be partisanly slanted.
> present the most popular views that disagree and explain what assumptions they are based on
> acknowledge popular criticism
The idea that current changes in the climate are not significantly influenced by human actions is popular. I hope you're advocating for a media style that reports how much this belief is driven oil company spending and astro-turfing, while the contrary position is supported by the majority of scientific research.
Also, how long do you think media need to keep chasing positions based on falsehoods?
Because the Koch foundations can keep pumping out new stuff longer than you can keep refuting it. If you're never willing to stop taking the bait you're just going to keep spinning until you fall down dizzy.
This privileges the liars, and you should make sure that your practices do not privilege the lies.
OMG I am so on board with "we've been ignoring Gaza for 20 years"!
But I gotta say that your model seems like a good one for when different sides are all acting in good faith. I take your note that we can't just assume that those we disagree with are bad faith actors, there is currently a very large and powerful grouping that is.
And we cannot ignore them. Any media practice has to decide how to engage with them - only dealing with the "good" opposition will fail.
This is the kind of guy who does a "Reply All" to a company-wide email.
(If people don't know the "free bananas in the kitchen" story, it's a fun one, although a bit long, so probably best saved to read during some down time.
I'm really not sure what kind of self-imagined journo links to this out of anything but derision
Maybe Nick is performing for Sulzberger as part of pressure campaign to get a sit-down interview?
SCOTUS took a step towards making Trump king yesterday & you're linking this?
Nick Confessore:
Biden aides concerned enough about appearance of frailty…entourage surround him when he walks to Marine 1, "to draw less att to 81-year-old's halting & stiff gait," Axios reports
This is damning about The Times & A.G.:
"'All these Biden people think that the problem is Peter Baker or whatever reporter they’re mad at that day,' one Times journalist said. 'It’s A.G. He’s the one who is pissed [that] Biden hasn’t done any interviews and quietly encourages all the tough reporting on his age.'"
How The New York Times Became the White House’s Least Favorite Paper https://politi.co/4b9avJs
In my view, Biden's decision to tell the Times to go lump it is just yet another example of Biden being more fit for the job than I'd expected, and further along the road of a common sense agenda that helps the average American.
Y'know, they've normalized it so deeply that it can take me a while to notice it:
Wouldn't it then also require an interview with the Times to verify that Trump is fit to hold the presidency? So they're going to interview Trump, and use the same standards to judge his competence? And they're going to hammer away at questions of Trump's competence until then?
Stanford Professor Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who advocates for mass COVID infection, rails against masking and who has cast doubt on the utility/safety of the mRNA COVD vaccines, just won an award with major prize money from one of the most powerful right-wing foundations in America. https://www.importantcontext.news/p/covid-contrarian-doctor-scores-big
Pro tip: You don’t need to use NFL (Not For Laffy) on days when I’m not live-posting trial threads.
NFL is only applicable when I need to skip your replies (they pile up enormously even on non-trial and slow days), but no need to extend that courtesy on non-proceedings days.
And thanks again for being considerate enough to use it when I need you to. It really helps.
Well I will now. 🤓. Along with NFL, when appropriate.
(Seriously, I'd never thought to mess with the pre-populated @'s. I still don't know how that affects toot threading, but I'll try it out in your busy mentions.)