'A step back in time': America's Catholic Church sees immense shift twd the old ways
“Generations of Catholics who embraced modernizing tide sparked in 1960s by Vatican II are increasingly giving way to religious conservatives who believe church has been twisted by change…
Shit thing I got change bout my personality is I the kinda nigga that just says yes and gives up feel me? Any fcking challenge I just agree to avoid confrontation!
That has to STOP ✋🏾
fk that . I'm standing my ground now on that . Fk that shit bro frfr !
That shit gon change on my Momma frfr !!
#Trump: The case is not about all of the other stuff you’ve been seeing because we’re using that to attempt, it’s had no impact because it’s so old, attempt to do something to me politically
An example of how a journalism org can provide vital context: The NY Times goes deep on the epic hypocrisy of prominent Republicans, who've been parroting antisemitic tropes for years but are suddenly -- and cynically -- pretending otherwise.
"Prominent Republicans have seized on campus protests to assail what they say is antisemitism on the left. But for years they have mainstreamed anti-Jewish rhetoric."
#TrumpTrial starts HERE. #Trump#legal
Please remember I don’t reply while live-posting. Plz use NFL (Not For Laffy, but no hashtag) so I can ignore those replies.
1/… Bower:
Trump enters the courtroom. Before arriving, he lingered for a moment in the doorway, talking to his lawyers, Emile Bove and Todd Blanche. He had a piece of paper in his hand, which he waved around as he spoke.
If wanting to make money for something is supposed to invalidate testimony, then we just stop all the trials and automatically find Trump guilty of everything.
“The media loves talking to PR people when it comes to corporations,” Piker said. “They have no problem talking to the media liaison when it comes to the NYPD or the LAPD and writing down everything they say without even asking remotely contentious questions. But when it comes to students, they don’t treat these students as an organized entity at all.” https://wapo.st/3y2WMp3
Well the last change being implemented over on that "other site" - people you've blocked can now see your posts - is the straw that broke this camel's back, nope nagannadoit. Bubye "X", hello here and others.
I definitely hope this doesn't come across as "what took you so long?", because you're probably going to get a few of those, but I would appreciate it if you could give some thought to, and answer, "what did Twitter have that Mastodon lacks, that kept you going there?".
It could be as simple as "switching is a pain", or "not enough cat videos" (which is what keeps one of my friends on insta).
Because if it's things we can fix, they're worth knowing.
Those sound sensible. I will say that for the last one, follow @GottaLaff . She follows multiple live-tweeters on the trials, and gives us up-to-the-minute details. And also has a cute dog.
Oh FFS I read like 12 paragraphs before I saw the name Bari Weiss. I feel like I could have avoided wasting that time if a "Contains Bari Weiss" notification had appeared up front as it should have.
#LBJ, a very accomplished POTUS who passed two Civil Rights Acts with bipartisan support, the Voting Rights Act, created Medicare and Medicaid, made #NASA's #Apollo program a priority, and had numerous other accomplishments, failed to change his mind about the Vietnam war amidst anti-war protests. He never got a second term, leaving the presidency to Richard Nixon
Much less accomplished Biden (see Anita Hill/C.Thomas) said student protests haven't made him rethink his policy in #Gaza.
It's probably best not to engage with dead-enders who'd rather watch society burn than be adults & vote for #Biden, or at least try to persuade rather than scold. But it's so damn frustrating they haven't already figured out at this late date that #Trump is an existential threat.
It's a valid point. But sometimes I think it's worth engaging with them for others to see. It's exhausting, but I think it's good when non-participating observers see that they get pushback.
(I might be flattering myself there, and maybe I just can't avoid an argument, but it might be right.)
Hey yall looking fo mo folks to fck with on dis app. I joined mastodon when I saw it trending when twitter was burning.
This shit good 👍🏾 but I want to fck with more interesting people. Like fun bad shit no I'm saying? 😄
Hit me up yall so I can follow yall back.
Love Jaden xxx #introduction#introductions#blackmastodon#blackfediverse ❤️❤️
I'm just an old fuck, so not what you're looking for (I spend waaay too much Mastodon time on politics), but I hope you find folks. We need more people doing fun bad shit around here
"They want to prove they are independent of liberals & their own readers—who happen to be the same people. The Times equates independence with making us unhappy. Jay Rosen spotted that dynamic years ago. That—and petulance—is what drives The Times to #ButHerEmails and now #ButHisAge." https://medium.com/whither-news/the-times-is-broken-02a4a6a27f8c
> present the most popular views that disagree and explain what assumptions they are based on
> acknowledge popular criticism
The idea that current changes in the climate are not significantly influenced by human actions is popular. I hope you're advocating for a media style that reports how much this belief is driven oil company spending and astro-turfing, while the contrary position is supported by the majority of scientific research.
Also, how long do you think media need to keep chasing positions based on falsehoods?
Because the Koch foundations can keep pumping out new stuff longer than you can keep refuting it. If you're never willing to stop taking the bait you're just going to keep spinning until you fall down dizzy.
This privileges the liars, and you should make sure that your practices do not privilege the lies.
OMG I am so on board with "we've been ignoring Gaza for 20 years"!
But I gotta say that your model seems like a good one for when different sides are all acting in good faith. I take your note that we can't just assume that those we disagree with are bad faith actors, there is currently a very large and powerful grouping that is.
And we cannot ignore them. Any media practice has to decide how to engage with them - only dealing with the "good" opposition will fail.