pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

I usually write this blog 5-6 days/week, but every now and again, I take a break, and when I do, I get massive link backlogs of stuff I want to write about, but lack the time to address in depth. When that happens, I turn my Saturday edition into a . Today, I present the sixth in the series - here's the other five:

https://pluralistic.net/tag/linkdump/

1/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/09/nein-nein/#everything-is-miscellaneous

2/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Why was I offline and away from my blog? I went to the . Yes, I was one of the 70,000+ people stuck in the mud at this year's , and when I emailed my editor at the to say I might be late on the op-ed I was working on, she asked me to write about what this year's mud crisis meant:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/06/opinion/burning-man-flood-playa-climate-change.html

3/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

tl;dr:

  • Bad weather is normal at Burning Man (it's a feature, not a bug);

  • Mostly burners leapt to the occasion, which is what people almost always do in disaster situations;

  • This is the second Burning Man year in a row;

  • The is tipping the from "extremely challenging" to "impossible";

  • This isn't the last event, place and tradition that will have to be radically reconsidered in light of the climate emergency;

4/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

But now I'm home, in my hammock, with all the laundry done - just in time to leave again. I'm about to head back to my hometown of for a book launch. , my latest nonfiction (from ) came out last week, and I'll be appearing at books on Tuesday:

https://anotherstory.ca/events/29283

5/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Internet Con is a " disassembly manual." It explains how Big Tech got so big (lax anti- enforcement, which led to , which let Big Tech abuse our privacy, rights, and rights), and how we can use so it's no longer , nor :

https://www.versobooks.com/products/3035-the-internet-con

6/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

You can read a long excerpt from the book in , which lays out some of the shovel-ready legislative, regulatory and technical proposals that are the book's main purpose:

https://www.wired.com/story/the-internet-con-cory-doctorow-book-excerpt/

You can also hear me read the whole introduction and first chapter of the audiobook on my podcast:

https://craphound.com/internetcon/2023/08/01/the-internet-con-how-to-seize-the-means-of-computation-audiobook-outtake/

7/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

That comes from the audiobook, a -free, independent edition that I financed, produced and narrated myself. You can get the audiobook everywhere except , , and .com, all of which have mandatory DRM policies. You can also get it direct from me:

https://transactions.sendowl.com/products/78992826/DEA0CE12/purchase

The DRM-free ebook is available everywhere ebooks are sold (Kobo, Kindle, Nook, etc), as well as in my own DRM-free ebook store:

https://transactions.sendowl.com/products/78992801/9C4FC2B8/purchase

8/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Verso's books are sold in bookstores around the world; you can support your local bookseller by buying it through :

https://bookshop.org/p/books/the-internet-con-how-to-seize-the-means-of-computation-cory-doctorow/18771891?ean=9781804291245

If you'd like a signed copy, there's stock at :

https://www.booksoup.com/book/9781804291245

Now, it was inevitable that I would do a book event for Internet Con in Toronto - I've never had a bad event there, and I love my hometown - but the timing of this event was driven by a non-book-related factor.

9/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

is appearing together at , to support the re-release of , the greatest concert film in human history:

https://pluralistic.net/StopMakingSense

People often ask me what my favorite book is, and I always tell them that you should never trust people who have one favorite book, as it inevitably turns out to be , , or . But while I don't have a favorite book, I have a clear and unambiguous favorite band.

10/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

If I was forced to listen to no music other than Talking Heads for the rest of my life, I would be perfectly happy. Ecstatic, even. Throw in , and and I probably wouldn't even notice anything missing.

There's a running joke among my Burning Man campmates that whenever I'm in charge of the music, I'm just shuffling Talking Heads rarities, and whenever someone puts on anything else, I demand to know which Talking Heads album it came from.

11/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Which is all to say: I have tickets for the Talking Heads event at TIFF and I could not be more excited.

Continuing on the Canadian theme, one of the annual highlights of Canadian media is the #MasseyLectures, a series of public lectures given around the country and rebroadcast on #CBC. These are always great, but recent years have been superb - @rondeibert's 2020 series was unmissable:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/11/10/dark-matter/#citizenlab

12/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

This year's Masseys are shaping up to be the GOAT. They're presented by @AstraTaylor, an activist rock-and-roller turned documentary filmmaker who is one of the founders of , fighting for cancellation. Everything Astra does is amazing and her profile on gives some background on the role that played in making her the powerful activist she is today:

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/astra-taylor-interview-2023-massey-lecturer-1.6959320

13/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

There's no question that things are messed up right now, but Astra and people like her shine out like beacons of hope. 17 years ago, self-described "democracy nut" $TomStites gave one of the seminal lectures on the role news media play in democracy:

http://citmedia.org/blog/2006/07/03/guest-posting-is-media-performance-democracys-critical-issue/

14/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

17 years later - and from his perch as editor at the essential @icij - Stites presents us a long-overdue, extremely pertinent followup: "Building Civic Energy is the Goal, Not Saving Old News Business Models":

https://banyanproject.coop/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Hope-College-speech-for-Banyan-website-1.pdf

15/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Stites's intervention is extremely timely, because policymakers all over the world have made the mistake of thinking that Big Tech is stealing the news media's content, which is absolutely untrue. It is good, actually, to index news stories and let people discuss, quote from and link to news stories. News you're not allowed to talk about isn't news, it's a secret.

But Big Tech is stealing from news. They're not stealing content - they're stealing money.

16/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

The Google/Apple duopoly rakes 30% off every subscription payment collected in an app. The Google/Meta duopoly rakes 51% out of every ad-dollar (and maintain that death-grip through creepy, -invading ). Meta and Twitter hold social media subscribers hostage, forcing publishers to pay to reach their own subscribers.

17/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

We don't want the news to be Big Tech's partners - we need them to be Big Tech's watchdogs. and other profit-sharing arrangements between the media and tech cut against the civic energy Stites wants to build.

(You can read more about this - along with policy prescriptions for halting Big Tech's rent-extraction from the news - in "Saving the News From Big Tech," my @EFF white-paper:)

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/saving-news-big-tech

18/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

If your spirits are lifted by stories of principled activists achieving important - and improbable - victories, you could do worse than to attend the on in Sept 14 (I'm the emcee). This year, we're honoring for her founding of , the project and @signalapp:

https://www.eff.org/awards/effawards/2023

19/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

In more activist news: @mozilla produced a startling and astoundingly good - if demoralizing - report on the state of digital privacy and security in the automotive sector:

https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/articles/its-official-cars-are-the-worst-product-category-we-have-ever-reviewed-for-privacy/

20/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Entitled, "It’s Official: Cars Are the Worst Product Category We Have Ever Reviewed for Privacy," the report reveals just how absolutely terrible the automotive sector is when it comes to privacy practices, collecting (and selling) (and giving away) information about your sex life, your geneology, your genetic characteristics, and your smell (no, seriously).

Their recommendations for which new car you should buy boil down to "don't buy a new car."

21/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

I have been urging consumer research groups to release a report like this for a decade. There are whole categories of gadgets - like, say, "" - that are unsafe at any speed. At a certain point, reviewers need to have the guts to say that every manufacturer in an entire sector is a dumpster fire and they should all be dragged in front of a firing squad - or at least a Congressional committee.

22/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Cars, after all, are nightmares of privacy invasion and rent-extraction, the source of on a massive scale, a mobile form of :

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/24/rent-to-pwn/#kitt-is-a-demon

23/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

The fact that cars score so badly on privacy is especially ironic given the campaign waged against the 2020 ballot initiative, in which car manufacturers held themselves out as the defenders of driver privacy from unscrupulous third parties who couldn't be trusted to handle the vast troves of data your car collects with every hour that God sends:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/09/03/rip-david-graeber/#rolling-surveillance-platforms

24/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

This is a familiar refrain: monopolists often claim that any check on their absolute authority over their users will expose those users to privacy risks. Apple has run a global ad-campaign claiming this, and while Apple does prevent Facebook from spying on owners, they also secretly spy on those customers in exactly the same way that Facebook used to, and lie about it:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/14/luxury-surveillance/#liar-liar

25/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

It turns out that giant companies just aren't good proxies for their customers' interests, and that the power they amass through monopolization shouldn't be counted on as a source of user safety. Monopolists won't reliably defend user privacy - that job belongs to democratically accountable regulators. That's an argument I developed in detail with in our EFF white-paper "Privacy Without Monopoly":

https://www.eff.org/wp/interoperability-and-privacy

26/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

That is, rather than getting privacy by "voting with your wallet," you need to get it by voting with your ballot. "The market" is an election that you vote in with dollars, which means that the people with the most dollars always win. When there are zero cars on the market that are safe to drive, you can't vote with your wallet by buying a good one.

27/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

On a related subject, the the DoJ has brought the most important tech anti-monopoly case of the century, charging Google with monopolizing search:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/06/technology/modern-internet-first-monopoly-trial-us-google-dominance.html

Part of the case turns on the fact that Google goes to extraordinary lengths to keep you from every trying another search engine, paying out more than $45 billion every year to be the default search on every device, program and service you might use.

28/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

IOW: Google spends entire Twitter's worth of dollars every year, lighting it on fire to keep you from finding out about rivals.

Google argues that this is fine, actually, because these are only defaults, and users can dig through their settings to change their search engine. Sure, Google - and the first 20 search results you serve are only defaults, and it wouldn't matter if you were ordered to put them ten screens down, because users could always scroll to see them.

29/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

But search defaults aren't the only way that Google locks in searchers - and then harms us by invading our privacy. Google's ubiquitous browser ties Google's search to Google's invasive, nonconsensual, total surveillance. Chrome turned 15 this year and Google made a huge PR splash out of the anniversary:

https://blog.google/products/chrome/google-chrome-new-features-redesign-2023/

30/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

But all that puffery conspicuously failed to mention that Google had quietly rolled out its long-discredited, new surveillance technology, , which it pretended to kill in 2021:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/22/ihor-kolomoisky/#not-that-competition

is back, rebranded as the : this is a system for spying on you so advertisers can target you. Google is spinning this as a privacy improvement because it might someday replace , one of the creepiest web surveillance systems.

31/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

But as writes for @arstechnica, Chrome is the last major browser to support third party cookies - both and block them by default. So Google is basically saying, "We are going to improve your privacy by changing how we spy on you, even though all our competitors don't do this kind of spying at all":

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-opposed-ad-platform-the-privacy-sandbox-launches-in-chrome/

32/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

This kind of gaslighting, where Google pisses in all our mouths and tells us it's raining, is the hallmark of a decrepit, arrogant, crapulent monopolist that needs to be shattered in the courts. Kudos to the DoJ for doing the people's business here - and kudos to DoJ boss for promising that he will not go into corporate law when he finishes his stint in government.

33/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

The DoJ isn't the only public agency that's serving the American people. The just announced proceedings to force labels for "smart" devices:

https://www.fcc.gov/consumer-governmental-affairs/fcc-proposes-cybersecurity-labeling-program-smart-devices

This is long overdue, and it's a welcome action from the FCC, which was hamstrung for years because cowardly Democratic senators joined with homophobic, libelous in blocking confirmation hearings for the amazing :

https://pluralistic.net/2022/12/15/useful-idiotsuseful-idiots/#unrequited-love

34/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

After years of abuse, Sohn bowed out. Now, has been confirmed to fill that fifth FCC chair, turning the FCC into a fully operational battle station:

https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/senate-votes-approve-anna-gomez-5th-fcc-commissioner

The fact that there's all this great stuff going on in the administrative branch is easy to lose sight of amidst the circus of federal electoral politics, in which has retained his role as ringmaster and chief distractor.

35/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Thankfully, we have expert Pantsless Emperor skewerers like @rubenbolling around - his latest revives his brilliant -inspired Trump gag:

https://boingboing.net/2023/09/06/tom-the-dancing-bug-a-calvinesque-and-hobbesian-look-at-taking-a-mug-shot.html

36/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Well, that's me signing off for the weekend - I've got to pack for my flight to Toronto. If you're looking for more weekend fun, check out the trailer for , the video game my old pal has been working on for seven years and which is heading for early access next month:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjNd3QQnENU

Just watch it. I mean. Wow.

--

Image:
Roel Schroeven (modified)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/roelschroeven/45413895

CC BY-SA 2.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/

eof/

MiriShuli,
@MiriShuli@mstdn.social avatar

@pluralistic Thank you for making my day. I raised 4 unschoolers, now aged 29-40 and they are the only people who give me any hope at all. Thank you, thank you for introducing me to Astra and her work.

TomSwirly,
@TomSwirly@toot.community avatar

@pluralistic The Burning Man symbolizes the affluent 1%'s complete and total indifference to the consequences of their obsessive consumption.

Once we have finished off the ecosystem, the remains of humanity will remember that the rich flew for millions of miles from all over the world simply to set an image of a man on fire, just like we set the planet on fire.

None of the participants understand the bitter irony: self-insight is not something the affluent do, in general.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • random
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines