metin, to Humor
@metin@graphics.social avatar
Nonilex, to politics
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The Who Need

They’re embracing & upending .

Several years ago, the scientist Michael Bang Petersen… wanted to understand why people share on the Internet. He & other researchers designed a study that involved showing participants blatantly false stories about & , such as , , , & Donald .

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/02/need-for-chaos-politicsl-science-concept/677536/

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

“These [need-for-chaos] individuals are not idealists seeking to tear down the established order so that they can build a better for everyone,” the authors wrote in their conclusion. “Rather, they indiscriminately share rumors as a way to unleash & mobilize individuals against the established order that fails to accord them the respect that they feel they personally deserve.”

that’s called []

EndemicEarthling, to random
@EndemicEarthling@todon.eu avatar

Some thoughts to those inclined to take the word of 'respectable' public figures (who are actually authoritarians and even génocidaires), and to those who have grown cynical of all lying politicians:

There used to be a concept called 'leaving hostages to fortune', in which public figures learned to avoid making promises or offering falsehoods that were vulnerable to thwarting/exposure by future contingencies.

Under the assumption that having your lies exposed or rash promise invalidated would be potentially career-ending, it used to sometimes be reasonable to operate on an epistemic criterion of "embarrassment", where we could increase our level of trust in a statement made by a public figure if it (a) wasn't currently able to be confirmed but (b) it seemed obvious that they would get caught out for lying if it were not true. I.e. "They wouldn't lie about that, right?"

However, the information landscape has profoundly shifted in recent years. (Or has seemed to for some people. See below)
1/4

EndemicEarthling,
@EndemicEarthling@todon.eu avatar

, , , and other recent authoritarian strongmen (, , , etc) have discovered just how effective the is in an age of deliberate political dysfunction, polarised electorates, microtargeted and the general milieu of ecocidal late capitalist societal crumbling ('the Crumbles'). Their supporters generally either never hear about the debunking, reject all evidence that conflicts with their commitments (), or don't care and openly embrace doublethink (cf , widespread support for increased violence in , troll farmers).

Mainstream journalists reliably get caught up in the of ; fret over ; the politically disengaged grow ever more cynical and abandon the search for truth, embracing the very , , and that this strategy of seeks to nurture.

2/4

br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

Netanyahu uses hostage rescue to justify Rafah strikes as his support dwindles

Reports of a fractured relationship with Joe Biden and collapse in public support are isolating Israeli PM

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/feb/12/netanyahu-uses-hostage-rescue-to-justify-rafah-strikes-as-support-for-israeli-pm-dwindles?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other

grrlscientist, to random
@grrlscientist@mstdn.social avatar

hello? we already KNOW this

The  system empowers a sliver of the US population in battleground states. And the majority may not even prevail

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/12/08/electoral-college-votes-swing-states-decline/

historyshapes, to history
@historyshapes@mastodon.social avatar
pluralistic, to USpolitics
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar
pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

A convincer's job is to persuade pizza-eaters to go for the burger instead.

https://doctorow.medium.com/pizzaburgers-8cfc62ee4aee

petersuber, to USpolitics
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Does . support ? It seems that he's taken no public position on it.

We won't have in all 50 states for the 2024 election. But and support RCV, and in that sense are at least hinting that they don't want to be spoiler candidates who hand the election to . Of course they may be spoiler candidates anyway. But is RFK even hinting that he doesn't want to be a spoiler candidate?

pairko,

@petersuber 2-things I was supposed learn from being a voter.
1 Don't vote for wingnut billionaires. Even if you dislike the mainstream candidates. Be Trump-proof. Any Perot voter who became a voter, failed to learn from the experience.
2 is the most important issue on the table in terms of preserving a -ian republic. It negates allowing folks to responsibly vote their conscience. Even if it's for or .

paninid, to philosophy
@paninid@mastodon.world avatar

I realized something, I’m not angry, I see things clearly, point and laugh like Diogenes, and for some people “indelible in the hippocampus is the laughter” and they interpret it as anger 🤷🏻‍♂️

pennine, to random

Surprise, surprise 's Govt suggests a tax bribe before the next Election. The is breathtaking. Tories have frozen tax thresholds 2 bring lower income people into paying more tax. Nondoms & private schools etc still enjoy tax loopholes.

cazabon, to random

Attention, junior

Despite appearances, and are not interchangeable.

Your more senior fellow team members developed the former while accumulating the latter. Your turn will come.

sharan, to random

I woke up cynical today. I don't like it at all.

timkmak, to random
@timkmak@journa.host avatar

This is first on Mastodon! Please boost this thread. It’s an important one.

Good morning to readers. Kyiv remains in Ukrainian hands.

Some career news: I’m leaving NPR as part of the layoffs that dramatically reduced the company’s workforce.

I’ve decided to go back into Ukraine to keep reporting.

But this time, alone.

timkmak,
@timkmak@journa.host avatar

Leaving a steady job at an established institution like for an unproven venture is a big bet.

It’s a bet that readers still care about the human toll that this war is taking.

It’s a bet against , and , and .

estelle, to Quotes
@estelle@techhub.social avatar

“Mass #propaganda discovered that its audience was ready at all times to believe the worst, no matter how absurd, and did not particularly object to being deceived because it held every statement to be a lie anyhow. The totalitarian mass leaders based their propaganda on the correct psychological assumption that, under such conditions, one could make people believe the most fantastic statements one day, and trust that if the next day they were given irrefutable proof of their falsehood, they would take refuge in #cynicism; instead of deserting the leaders who had lied to them, they would protest that they had known all along that the statement was a lie and would admire the leaders for their superior tactical cleverness.”
― Hannah Arendt, "The Origins of Totalitarianism" #quotes #mediaStudies #commOdon #truth #agnotology #history

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines