Nonilex, to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

🧵

Testimony started w/a bang last week as David , the fmr publisher of The , said that he had entered into a secret plot w/ & to negative stories about Trump as he ran for president in 2016.
, the 3rd to testify, started off w/dry details about banking transactions. But is leading us to the payment


https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/30/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Nonilex,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Today’s testimony & the texts being shared provide a look at the sleazy negotiations that were occurring behind the scenes in early Aug 2016, while was the nominee & only a few months from being elected. Publicly, at this time, Trump was consolidating a skeptical establishment behind his candidacy. Privately, his fixer, , was discussing the finer points of a w/ & the owner of The .

TheMetalDog, to Metal
@TheMetalDog@mastodon.social avatar
pheras, to random
@pheras@fosstodon.org avatar
remixtures, to ai Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "The Browser Company’s new app lets you ask semantic questions to a chatbot, which then summarizes live internet results in a simulation of a conversation. Which is great, in theory, as long as you don’t have any concerns about whether what it’s saying is accurate, don’t care where that information is coming from or who wrote it, and don’t think through the long-term feasibility of a product like this even a little bit. Or, as Dash put it, “It’s the parasite that kills the host.”

The base logic of something like Arc’s AI search doesn’t even really make sense. As Engadget recently asked in their excellent teardown of Arc’s AI search pivot, “Who makes money when AI reads the internet for us?” But let’s take a step even further here. Why even bother making new websites if no one’s going to see them? At least with the Web3 hype cycle, there were vague platitudes about ownership and financial freedom for content creators. To even entertain the idea of building AI-powered search engines means, in some sense, that you are comfortable with eventually being the reason those creators no longer exist. It is an undeniably apocalyptic project, but not just for the web as we know it, but also your own product."

https://www.fastcompany.com/91033052/does-anyone-even-want-an-ai-search-engine?mc_cid=f22a3b4b18

remixtures,
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

"AI search is about summarizing web results so you don't have to click links and read the pages yourself.

If that's the future of the web, who the fuck is going to write those pages that the summarizer summarizes? What is the incentive, the business-model, the rational explanation for predicting a world in which millions of us go on writing web-pages, when the gatekeepers to the web have promised to rig the game so that no one will ever visit those pages, or read what we've written there, or even know it was us who wrote the underlying material the summarizer just summarized?

If we stop writing the web, AIs will have to summarize each other, forming an inhuman centipede of botshit-ingestion. This is bad news, because there's pretty solid mathematical evidence that training a bot on botshit makes it absolutely useless. Or, as the authors of the paper – including the eminent cryptographer Ross Anderson – put it, "using model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects":" https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/23/gazeteer/#out-of-cycle

charlie, to random
@charlie@hachyderm.io avatar

> "If that's the future of the web, who the fuck is going to write those pages that the summarizer summarizes?" — @pluralistic (https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/23/gazeteer/#out-of-cycle)

I feel this so strongly, these days.

There is still hope: the tabloid and the glossy magazine did not exterminate the broad-sheet or put an end to quality journalism.

Comparatively, these LLMs produce far lower quality than them.

When this fad is over, when this bubble bursts, an audience for original content will still be there.

pluralistic, to random
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Some Saturday mornings, I look at the week's blogging and realize I have a lot more links saved up than I managed to write about this week, and then I do a linkdump. There've been 14 of these, and this is number 15:

https://pluralistic.net/tag/linkdump/

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/23/gazeteer/#out-of-cycle

1/

mikemathia, to random
@mikemathia@ioc.exchange avatar
Susan_Larson_TN, to gay
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar
selzero, to random
@selzero@syzito.xyz avatar
StitchedInkMedia, to Canada
@StitchedInkMedia@flipboard.social avatar

With a tenth of the population and workforce, they think they are owed half the country’s CPP. This should be a last straw insult. Canada should have its own referendum on kicking Alberta out, land-lock them, stop subsidies and payments, impose its own charges for anything flowing out, sue for all damages from excessive emissions and say good riddance.

https://calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/alberta-pension-plan-push-destabilizing-says-calgary-chamber

jimmyb, to gaming
@jimmyb@selfhosted.cafe avatar

Worked on some more this evening. Making a snack, hitting the showers, reading and passing out.

ryedai,

@jimmyb

"#Passing #out "

Ah yes. That thing that #magically happens once you touch the #bed / #couch

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • cubers
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • modclub
  • tacticalgear
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines