Generative AI

telliususa,

Supply Chain Management Optimization Using Generative AI Data Analytics

Generative AI data analytics is revolutionizing supply chain management by providing unprecedented accuracy, efficiency, and flexibility. By leveraging generative AI, businesses can enhance demand forecasting, optimize inventory management, streamline logistics, and build more resilient supply chains. As the technology continues to advance, the integration of Generative ai data analytics into supply chain processes will become increasingly essential for maintaining competitiveness in a rapidly changing market.

lns,
@lns@fosstodon.org avatar

I wonder if generative AI will cause a real drop in motivation for organic human creativity.. "I'll just have AI make it for me."

lns,
@lns@fosstodon.org avatar

@etherdiver Can you elaborate please? I can definitely see this in the creative professional field, for example.

etherdiver,
@etherdiver@ravenation.club avatar

@lns most creative people create things not as a product but because they have a drive to create: a lot of times the final product is almost incidental.

Doing creative stuff for your job is rarely an actual expression of your creativity, even if it requires some element of creativity.

Will creative people cheat and use AI for their jobs? Maybe, if it ever gets to the point where it doesn't suck. Work is work, after all.

Will they stop being creative for creativity's sake? Absolutely not.

mesh,
@mesh@denton.social avatar

We are looking for a host for our fully autonomous solar-powered node!

If you know of a building we could rig our node to near or in downtown Denton / the square, please let us know!

Long Range ( ) radio repeaters operate best with a clear line of sight, so getting a node on a tall building in the center of would be extremely beneficial for expanding our network!

For information on what Meshtastic / LoRa is, please visit Austin Mesh's website: https://austinmesh.com/

Setting up this network in Denton will allow for a robust emergency communication network during grid outages AND will allow anyone to text without cell service or internet, increasing access to communication for all!

Shinra, French
@Shinra@imaginair.es avatar

Essais mobile avec du

2 sets différents et des fréquences différentes

ciredutempsEsme,
@ciredutempsEsme@mamot.fr avatar

@Shinra lora c'est la même chose que lorawan ?

modean987,
@modean987@mastodon.world avatar
pixel,
@pixel@social.pixels.pizza avatar

@modean987 Same prompt:

drahardja,
@drahardja@sfba.social avatar

Much as I dislike the theft of human labor that feeds many of the products we see today, I have to agree with @pluralistic that law is the wrong way to address the problem.

To frame the issue concretely: think of whom copyright law has benefited in the past, and then explain how it would benefit the individual creator when it is applied to . (Hint: it won’t.)

Copyright law is already abused and extended to an absurd degree today. It already overreaches. It impoverishes society by putting up barriers to creation and allowing toll-collectors to exist between citizen artists and their audience.

Labor law is likely what we need to lean on. and protect creators in a way that copyright cannot. Inequality and unequal bargaining power that lead to exploitation of artists and workers is what we need to address head-on.

Copyright will not save us.

“AI "art" and uncanniness”

https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/13/spooky-action-at-a-close-up/#invisible-hand

990000,
@990000@mstdn.social avatar

@drahardja I kind of agree and I think copyright law is entirely insufficient to deal with what AI is doing. I think it falls more along crossing lines of ethics and also undermining fair competition because of the automation of copying and reconstituting. We need new laws.

drahardja,
@drahardja@sfba.social avatar

@990000 I would go further to say that applying copyright law to AI will take us further from the equitable future we want. If copyright is successfully applied to AI, what we will see after the dust settles is a handful of media behemoths that profit mightily from AI, without slowing down the damage that AI does to the value of creative human labor.

I always return to this pithy guide by @emilymbender when thinking about this topic: we need to think of AI as automation, albeit one that is more effective at displacing a wide variety of human labor than ever. We can’t use copyright to stop automation; it will just enrich a different set of kingpins without stopping its effects.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK0md9tQ1KY

bespacific,
@bespacific@newsie.social avatar

Fake studies have flooded publishers of top leading to thousands of , M of $ in lost revenue. Biggest hit has come to 217-year-old based in Hoboken NJ which announced it is closing 19 journals, some of which were infected by large-scale research . Wiley has reportedly had to retract more than 11,300 papers recently “that appeared compromised” as makes it easier for paper mills to peddle fake research. https://www.wsj.com/science/academic-studies-research-paper-mills-journals-publishing-f5a3d4bc

TEG,
@TEG@mastodon.online avatar

@bespacific I've always had a special hatred for a particular kind of review request/paper, where you can feel so clearly there's something wrong with it, but it's very hard to put your finger on what exactly. It's just slightly rotten everywhere. I found them hard to reject in a review becasue they're slippery in that way, "it's stinky" probably won't cut it.

Had one of those review requests a day or so ago and I strongly suspect AI was used from the Abstract, but how do you nail it down?

pierre, French
@pierre@mastodon.design avatar

Le téléphone des #maker et de la fin du monde vient de sortir.
L' #unPhone intègre #LoRa, compatible @meshtastic, Wifi, bluetooth, écran tactile, boussole, accéléromètre, port SD, infrarouge
https://shop.pimoroni.com/products/unphone?variant=40829810311251

pierre,
@pierre@mastodon.design avatar

@ciredutempsEsme @meshtastic
Low Range est une technologie de modulation de fréquence des ondes radios de faible puissance et de longue distance
Long Range Wide Area Network est un protocole de télécommunication radio basé sur la technologie LoRa, permettant de dialoguer avec les serveurs applicatifs.
Lora peut être exploité sans passer par le protocole LoRaWAN

ciredutempsEsme,
@ciredutempsEsme@mamot.fr avatar
modean987,
@modean987@mastodon.world avatar
opentermsarchive,
@opentermsarchive@mastodon.lescommuns.org avatar

What can we discover by reading the terms and conditions of tools? What do users consent to? What are the regulatory responses in 🇪🇺 🇨🇳 🇺🇸?
Join our online event on May 23 at 16:30 UTC+2 to discover the Watch project!
https://www.sciencespo.fr/ecole-droit/en/events/generative-ai-watch/
We will present a dataset of terms and conditions of major generative services, some of the discoveries that we made when tracking their changes, and how the changing regulatory landscape could impact those terms.

bud_t,
@bud_t@m.ai6yr.org avatar

Working in my portable digi/i-gate. It's almost ready for field testing!

ai6yr,

@bud_t Hmm, maybe not safe to put that in an airplane, LOL.

bud_t,
@bud_t@m.ai6yr.org avatar

@ai6yr Yeah, I don't think I'll try to show this to the TSA agents at DEN. I'm sure they would have lots of questions lol. But that's ok - I have no plans to fly with this thing (yet).

scy,
@scy@chaos.social avatar

I'm old enough to remember how @creativecommons was founded as a way for independent creators to safely share their work and build upon each other.

In 2024, their take is now "billion dollar companies plagiarizing your art is fair use".

https://creativecommons.org/2023/02/17/fair-use-training-generative-ai/

Hats off to the author, you don't see that kind of, uh, skillful rhetoric chicanery every day. Like "generative AI doesn't compete with artists because artists are not in the data market". 😬

ArneBab,
@ArneBab@rollenspiel.social avatar

@scy this sounds like the lax vs. copyleft free software argument again.

Some people use lax licenses, because they want to allow all to benefit from their work. And then complain when those don’t give back.

Others use copyleft licenses, because they don’t want their work used to limit the freedom of others.

I am in the second group. I use cc by-sa, because I don’t want my creations used in works that prohibit modification and sharing.

AI enables proprietarization anyway.
@creativecommons

ArneBab,
@ArneBab@rollenspiel.social avatar

@schizanon

Me: "anyone can use my content, if they also allow that with what they create"

: "removes that notice"

Someone else: You may not modify what I created with AI!

Me: "how dare you forbid me to change the work that you created with my work!"

@scy @creativecommons

ishotjr,
@ishotjr@chaos.social avatar

how are folks feeling about the use of ? when is it ok to use? when is it not? what are some examples you've seen of the wrong call being made? would love to get a ton of folks' opinions so please for reach! ✨💗✨

gsuberland,
@gsuberland@chaos.social avatar

@ishotjr never, it looks shite and is an ethical nightmare.

North,
@North@chaos.social avatar

@ishotjr I think the technology is fine, but there are no ethical generative AI services currently available.

The only ethical model I can imagine is if a model were trained by an artist collective and then the output was sold by those artists or the model was licensed by those artists.

That said, this conversation is a rare privilege. We've already been saddled with a lot of practically unavoidable unethical infrastructure and everyone has to draw their own line on what's acceptable.

elosha, German
@elosha@chaos.social avatar

Top Artikel (en-us) über den aktuellen Stand der sogenannten Semantic Apocalypse, das das Vollmüllen des Internets mit „#KI“-Content. Mit exzellenten Beispielen, aus den Augen eines Buchautoren und Neurowissenschaftlers.

https://www.theintrinsicperspective.com/p/here-lies-the-internet-murdered-by

#aifakes #generativeai

ftranschel,
@ftranschel@norden.social avatar

@elosha "Semantic Apocalypse" ist allemal lustiger als "Model Collapse".

(Und ja, ich weiß, dass es da einen Unterschied gibt.)

hschmale,
@hschmale@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

Has anyone put any thought into how to protect your personal blog from the generative ai scrapers? I've already blocked openai in robots.txt, but it seems like more and more small providers are popping up who don't honor these requests?

Maybe a noise filters artists are using with invisible characters but then again how do I make sure Google bot can see my posts? I don't care about humans using my work but I take issue with machines

hschmale,
@hschmale@mastodon.sdf.org avatar

@ParadeGrotesque got any links for an up to date robots.txt?

Here's mine:
https://www.henryschmale.org/robots.txt

I'm thinking I might add a html comment to all my blog posts about that copyright/copy left.

But idk what to do beyond that.

And meta tags are still enough to do an awful lot and I need them to be good to make sharing easy.

ParadeGrotesque,
@ParadeGrotesque@mastodon.sdf.org avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • generativeAI
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • provamag3
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • tester
  • anitta
  • megavids
  • ethstaker
  • Leos
  • JUstTest
  • lostlight
  • All magazines