pvonhellermannn, to random
@pvonhellermannn@mastodon.green avatar

Half thinking of starting an #AcademicVenting hashtag here, about the dire, dire state of UK (global?) higher education. Sharing nuggets of senior management decisions, neoliberal language, and overall slow collapse.

Won’t work of course because most of us can’t risk honesty, but honestly: the everyday reality of what is happening deserves recording in all its depressing and damning detail. #Universities #AcademicChatter #neoliberalism

MarkHanson, to SciComm
@MarkHanson@fediscience.org avatar

The strain on scientific publishing 📄:

The publishing sector has a problem. Scientists are overwhelmed, editors are overworked, special issue invitations are constant, research paper mills, article retractions, journal delistings… JUST WHAT IS GOING ON!?

Myself, pablo, @paolocrosetto and Dan have spent the last few months investigating just that.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15884

A thread🧵1/n

image/png

vicgrinberg, to random
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

Well, that's a new one: did you know that states this about their peer review?

"When a manuscript is accepted for publication, the names of the reviewers who endorsed its publication appear on the published article, without exceptions."
(from: https://www.frontiersin.org/about/peer-review)

So this is a hard no on principle. (I'm not worried about myself but I am very much worried about retaliations towards younger and/or more vulnerable folks reviewing for them.)

vicgrinberg, (edited ) to Astro
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

For all the folks starting their (or their master thesis) today - a reminder why your PhD advisor can solve a problem so "easily" ...

ninokadic, to philosophy
@ninokadic@mastodon.social avatar

Am I the only one who unequivocally thinks that philosophy has made progress? Perhaps I have a different definition of what progress means, but surely I can't be the only one?

The number of theories and arguments that philosophers uncovered, as well as the clarity and breadth of their analyses, is certainly progress.

@philosophy @academicchatter

aram, to academia
@aram@aoir.social avatar

I hate that I have to send emails like this. But that's what it's come to, isn't it.

@academicchatter

vicgrinberg, to academia
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

No, I cannot rank this student among their class (I have not taught classes at this institution!) & I cannot compare them as "2nd in 10"or similar among the master students I supervised: I supervised folks at three different institutions & systems in two different countries plus every one has their strength and weaknesses, there is no order from best to worst.

My reference letter will tell you nothing and you are wasting everyone's time because of your stupid form 😬

vicgrinberg, to fediverse
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

1/16 This July, I gave an invited talk in the "Communicating Science Through Art" session at the European Astronomical Society annual meeting, organized by the amazing @theastrophoenix . And I thought it may be something that would also interest you folks.

The aim of the talk was partly to give people insight into my why & how of my art. But mainly to encourage others to just try. In a very subjective manner.

A thread: 🧵

vicgrinberg, to academia
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

Estimated disadvantages for non-native English speakers when conducting different scientific activities.

Figure 5 from Amano et al. (2023) "The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science." PLoS Bio, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184

Or, if you prefer a more popular summary, see https://theconversation.com/non-native-english-speaking-scientists-work-much-harder-just-to-keep-up-global-research-reveals-208750

shandyist, to FantasyWriters
@shandyist@c18.masto.host avatar

I wish I knew this already, but I don't: if anyone out there has done a scholarly edition of novel for a publisher, how do you work out the timeline in your proposal? Thanks in advance for any thoughts!

design_law, to academicchatter
@design_law@mastodon.social avatar

Any rhetoric profs or other experts out there?

I'm looking for something to cite for the proposition that what we call things/how we label things actually matters.

Are there authoritative basic treatises, articles, books I should be looking at?

Recommendations (including self-citations) most appreciated!

@academicchatter

AlexSanterne, (edited ) to Futurology
@AlexSanterne@astrodon.social avatar

"Saying NO !" decision tree for

I just found this awesome flow chart providing an accurate decision tree on when and how to say at work.

I'm gonna print it and stick it on my office door !

@academicchatter

credits: @gbosslet

elduvelle, (edited ) to academia
@elduvelle@neuromatch.social avatar

Question for all tenure-track or tenured of any field:
Do you have to teach (at least some) in your current position?
Would you prefer not to do any teaching?

Question for the comments: do you think research and teaching should be done by separate people?

neuralreckoning, to academia
@neuralreckoning@neuromatch.social avatar

So oral exam at end of PhD. Good idea or just a tradition that doesn't make any sense any more? What are the good things about them? If we didn't do them, how else could we get those good things?

DrEvanGowan, to random
@DrEvanGowan@fediscience.org avatar

Since I am planning to delete my Twitter account soon, I am slowly deleting every post I made manually, so I can see what I posted (I also do not trust that they will delete the posts if I delete the account). A large portion of my replies are congratulating people on things like their newly published paper, graduating, getting a grant, etc. These kind of posts are what I miss about Twitter, and I hope more people come and post their successes on Mastodon.

maartjeoostdijk, to academicchatter
@maartjeoostdijk@mstdn.social avatar

How to respond to a reviewer who thinks using 'we' consistently throughout a manuscript (in methods and a little in discussion 'we found' etc) sounds unscientific? @academicchatter

koen_hufkens, to LateStageCapitalism
@koen_hufkens@mastodon.social avatar

"Monopolist publisher objects to free dissemination of science funded through a tax evasion scheme"

It doesn't get much wilder than this I fear.

@academicchatter

https://www.science.org/content/article/bold-bid-avoid-open-access-fees-gates-foundation-says-grantees-must-post-preprints

freyablekman, to Trains
@freyablekman@sciencemastodon.com avatar

Good morning everyone 👋

Today I am travelling (almost) transcontinental by train. Few changes so what could possibly go wrong… 😑 probably a few things but I’m prepared!🤣 I will add to this thread during my trip today

So let’s get going! 🏠🚇🚄🚄🏖️

CCochard, to math
@CCochard@mastodon.social avatar

In thermodynamics, why is work not a differential?
I wwould welcome any advice on ressources that explains this.

brembs, to random
@brembs@mastodon.social avatar

The academic journal publishing system sure feels all too often a bit like a sinking boat. We have many leaks, e.g.:

  • a reproducibility leak
  • an affordability leak
  • a functionality leak
  • a data leak
  • a code leak
  • an interoperability leak
  • a discoverability leak
  • a peer-review leak
  • a long-term preservation leak
  • a link rot leak
  • an evaluation/assessment leak
  • a data visualization leak
    etc.

1/x

TheConversationUS, to FreeSpeech
@TheConversationUS@newsie.social avatar

Is free speech in trouble on college campuses?

The controversy over university presidents who gave lawyerly answers in Congress about punishing students who call for genocide reflects the reality of college free speech codes that try to both encourage debate and stop hatred.

A expert provides some needed context:
https://theconversation.com/why-university-presidents-find-it-hard-to-punish-advocating-genocide-college-free-speech-codes-are-both-more-and-less-protective-than-the-first-amendment-219566
@academicchatter

furqanshah, to academia
@furqanshah@mstdn.science avatar

What do we want? Open science + transparent peer review!

When do we want it? Now!

Yet, reviewers will hide behind the cloak of anonymity. As an editor, there is little to be done about such behaviour. 😔

🧪

@academicchatter @academicsunite @ScienceCommunicator @openscience

ergative, to ukteachers
@ergative@wandering.shop avatar

Hey, Mastodon! Indiana's attorney general has created an anti-teacher snitch portal for people to report school teachers for being too woke. It allows you to upload files and everything!

There appears to be no safeguard against entering any text you want in any of the boxes, and no location/residence checking.

Dare I ask you to do your thing?

https://www.in.gov/attorneygeneral/education-liberty/

Boosts welcome!

vicgrinberg, to random
@vicgrinberg@mastodon.social avatar

Dear academic job applicants - if an upper limit of 4 or 5 pages for your science proposal is given, please do not send 9 or 10. This immediately disqualifies you.

alesssia, to random
@alesssia@mas.to avatar

in their 30s are less happy than their non-academic peers in their 20s. Short-term contracts and constant relocating make it almost impossible, among the others, to settle down, and start a family.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-03296-9

As an who lived in 3 countries, has now 2 very young daughters, and if she gets tenure will be well in her 40s, I can't stop wondering what is the reason behind this, because, honestly, I can't see any

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • cubers
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cisconetworking
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • anitta
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines