jik, to meta
@jik@federate.social avatar

I don't know how many times will need to "integrate" with open networks ostensibly to everyone's benefit, only to ultimately kill off or fundamentally change them for the worse, before some people figure out that giving them the benefit of the doubt is foolish and dangerous, but apparently it hasn't been enough times yet.

shved, to Cybersecurity

Cloudflare. A service that "protects" you from bad actors, , and other online threats.
What seemingly no one talks about is that 80% of market is owned by Cloudflare. They move more traffic than companies combined!
They hold such obscene amount of power and control over the , its hard to describe.
They are the gatekeepers, they are enforcers of whom to block, and what to allow to exist.
Google holds no power when compared to Cloudflare.

EU_Commission, to random
@EU_Commission@social.network.europa.eu avatar

Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Microsoft

These are the first 6 companies designated as ‘gatekeepers' under the Digital Markets Act.

They have 6 months to ensure their core platform services comply with our rules, including:

✔ Allowing users to unsubscribe and remove pre-installed services
✔ Allowing the download of alternative app stores

❌ Banning tracking outside of their services without consent
❌ Stopping ranking their products more favourably

https://europa.eu/!NbfBbn

#DMA

A plain visual that vaguely resembles the format of a digital letter, with the European Commission logo in the top-left corner and the following text as the body: " 6 September 2023 Re: Digital Markets Act Core platform services: Ads: - Amazon - Google - Meta - Browser: - Chrome - Safari Number-Independent Interpersonal Communications Services: - WhatsApp - Messenger " In the bottom-right corner a stamp-like text that says: “6 months to comply.”
A plain visual that vaguely resembles the format of a digital letter, with the European Commission logo in the top-left corner and the following text as the body: " 6 September 2023 Re: Digital Markets Act Core platform services: Intermediation: - Amazon Marketplace - App Store - Google Maps - Google Play - Google Shopping - Meta Marketplace Search: - Google Search Video Sharing: - YouTube " In the bottom-right corner a stamp-like text that says: “6 months to comply.”
A plain visual that vaguely resembles the format of a digital letter, with the European Commission logo in the top-left corner and the following text as the body: " 6 September 2023 Re: Digital Markets Act Core platform services: Social Network: - Facebook - Instagram - LinkedIn - TikTok Operating System: - Google Android - iOS - Windows PC OS " In the bottom-right corner a stamp-like text that says: “6 months to comply.”

drimplausible,
@drimplausible@mastodon.online avatar

@EU_Commission So the is dead. Need to workshop the acronym a bit though.

doesn't quite work

ABAAMM?
ABAMAM?
BAMAMA?
MAMABA?
MAMBAA? Oh, there we go, that's close. a little sheepish at the end though.
MAAMBA? Not bad. I like it. Rolls off the tongue.

Cyber-MAMBAA...
Techno-MAAMBA...

"The EU has just designated the cyber-MAAMBA overlords as Gatekeepers..."

🤔

Yeah...

arstechnica, to random
@arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

Author discovers AI-generated counterfeit books written in her name on Amazon

Amazon resisted a removal request, citing lack of "trademark registration numbers."

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/08/author-discovers-ai-generated-counterfeit-books-written-in-her-name-on-amazon/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

Tertle950,

@arstechnica Do not trust .

Do not trust in general.

imrehg, to random
@imrehg@fosstodon.org avatar

How would one prepare for tech interviews in 2023? Or does it matter which letter of the 5 one is applying to?

Especially curious when targetting IC track (where the tech side is likely more prominent)

__h2__, to Facebook

Because there seems to be a whole lot of crazy discussions going on in right now... here are my 2¢ in case anyone cares:

· I have never used any product before and don't plan on doing so
· I think are a serious threat to democracy
· I still welcome being able to federate with a Facebook server and believe it 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑑 be positive for Fedi as a whole

You can still block FB instances and/or users on an individual bases; please don't make our admins block it for everyone.

nattiegoogie, to Facebook

Even in a fantasy world where isn't explicitly planning to co-opt or destroy the ...

Mastodon barely survived the last , and it's still trying to take in the .

Those were nothing compared to FB.

There are ~12M people on the Fediverse.

What do you think happens when 200M FB users join? When Zuck can impulsively defederate, or add/change/remove features and rules, at will, and oh...10M non-FB users object?

nattiegoogie,

@photovotary

Right now, I can launch my own personal Mastodon server, connect to any other server, chat with anyone...many people do this now.

I can also host my own email server, but I can't send email to anyone with a gmail account, nor any other mainstream address...not because I'm blocking them, but because Google changed the rules of how email works, and forced everyone else to use their rules and block me, automatically.

That's the future of a with the corps included.

nattiegoogie, to Facebook

I said this before, but clearly, it needs a stand-alone toot.

trying to join the is

...Russia asking to join NATO.

...Exxon asking to join Greenpeace.

...The Big Bad Wolf offering to help you build your wolf-proof house.

This is not rocket surgery.

The whole reason people built the Fediverse was to get away from the way of Internetting.

Never let them join our club.

tchambers, to random

To real concerns that Meta might do to Acivitypub as Google & they did to XMPP, this seems helpful including this point via
@darius

"Regardless of bigco shenanigans around open protocols, Kazemi isn’t worried about what happens with ActivityPub. 'The nice thing for me is that if the big companies do jump in [to support ActivityPub] and then sort of walk it back,' he remarked, 'at worst, we’ll be back to where we are right now, which is still a pretty nice place.'”

https://thenewstack.io/why-developers-should-experiment-with-the-fediverse/

nattiegoogie,

@darius

Seriously?

I can host my own email server, but I can't send email to anyone with a gmail account ... not because I'm blocking Google, but because Google blocks me ... and because Google is big enough to force everyone else on Earth to block me, too.

That's the future of a with the corps included.

@claudius @tchambers @anildash

claudius,

@nattiegoogie additionally, people will look weird at you when you explain how Google is at fault. They will not understand it. They will think you're making up some conspiracy theory. Finally, they will say "just get Gmail. It's free."

No single instance/corporation should ever get that much power. That extends to mastodon-dot-social, which is also (in my opinion) too large for a healthy Fediverse.

@darius @tchambers @anildash

nattiegoogie,

@claudius

I agree about mastodon-dot-social, but that's a drop in the bucket compared to letting the into the . It frankly blows my mind that this is even a debate. I'd sooner re-federate with the fucking nazis.

@darius @tchambers @anildash

drahardja, to internet
@drahardja@sfba.social avatar

Don’t know how I missed the transition from to when renamed to .

hankg, to fediverse

An analogy we often use on the fediverse with respect to its decentralized nature is email. You didn't get an account on "The Email" you got an account on an email server which knew how to talk to other email servers. It is a great analogy. I've fallen into the trap of extending that to think that people used to get decentralized systems and it wasn't a barrier to entry but now they don't thanks to big tech changing expectations. While there is some of that a lot of that perception is rose colored glasses. The problem here goes back to the analysis paralysis of having to pick a server rather than there being some automatic default that "just works". "Didn't we do that with email?" Did we? Most people's first email accounts were from their ISP. Most places didn't have much selection of ISPs so you got "the internet" and "an email address" came along with it. If their first address wasn't a personal one at home it was one from work. Work made the decision for them. Even in the peak days of dialup many people's first internet experience was actually AOL not the raw internet. AOL came with an internet email address that "just worked". The aversion to extra inertia of having to choose servers or services at sign up time may be a bit higher than it was before FAANG took over the internet but it's still back to the same problem: human nature.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • tester
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • InstantRegret
  • osvaldo12
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • normalnudes
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines