kubikpixel, to ChatGPT German
@kubikpixel@chaos.social avatar

Neu ist diese Info nicht und doch wird es weiträumig KI bei Programmierung eingesetzt. Deswegen aber auch Zeit für die Korrektur vom Code verschwendet.

»Qualitätsmängel – Forscher warnen vor ChatGPT-Einsatz beim Programmieren:
Viele Programmierer:innen greifen bei der Softwareentwicklung zu KI-Chatbots wie ChatGPT. Das sollten sie aber eher bleiben lassen, wie jetzt eine Studie nahelegt.«

😒 https://t3n.de/news/qualitaet-chatgpt-programmieren-1626510/


marcel, to ai
@marcel@waldvogel.family avatar

Modern #AI text generators create randomized output with no prior planning. They resist to be quality-checked by tools and processes established in the software industry.

Given this, the results are amazing. However, companies are selling the idea that these assistants will do quality checking themselves soon™.

This is mass delusion. But hey, the perks for managers/investors are worthwhile 🤷.

#LLM #ChatGPT #Google #Gemini
https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/24/24164119/google-ai-overview-mistakes-search-race-openai

marcel,
@marcel@waldvogel.family avatar

Measuring correctness is very hard, so any percentage, especially a high one, needs context:

What problems do you pose to the ?
How is the accuracy of the answer measured?
How is reproducibility of the measurement ensured? (Also over small modifications of the training data or code? I.e. regression tests?)

Right now, I can be sure that my hammer hits the nail, unless my aim is off or the hammerhead was already loose. AI tools don't have that property and maybe never will.
@TheServitor

kellogh,
@kellogh@hachyderm.io avatar

@marcel @TheServitor correctness is a little wonky to talk about, because the comparison isn’t direct. in engineering, we assume that 100% correctness isn’t achievable, if you haven’t found bugs, you just haven’t used it long enough. but with a program, every time you find a bug and fix it, you’re permanently closer to correct, whereas with an LLM, each inference is a new case. all you can do is optimize the entire model. so LLM correctness is statistically extremely difficult

billmason, to ai
@billmason@mastodon.social avatar

AI and ChatGPT now in mouse software, because of course.

https://512pixels.net/2024/04/ai-overlay-tmp-home-folder-mac-os/

dannotdaniel, (edited )
@dannotdaniel@mastodon.social avatar

@billmason omg noooo

I have this mouse. Good mouse.

I'm on Ubuntu though. No Logitech software, just something called Solaar.

Thanks for posting this. I am disgusted that they would do this, especially as a default.

chris_hayes, to ChatGPT
@chris_hayes@fosstodon.org avatar

Recruiters using ChatGPT beware, hehehe.

Related - if anyone is looking for a web dev with agency experience working on modern headless + serverless stacks, toot in my general direction.

br00t4c, to ChatGPT
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
MylesRyden, to ChatGPT
@MylesRyden@vivaldi.net avatar

These two posts showed up one after another on my timeline. 🤣

mstankiewicz, to ChatGPT Polish
@mstankiewicz@pol.social avatar

Czy integracja inteligentnego domu z #ChatGPT to dobry pomysł? Nie wiem, przekonamy się!

mstankiewicz,
@mstankiewicz@pol.social avatar

Chyba stworzyłem coś, co mógłbym nazwać „Smart Home 2.0”

schwinghamer, to climate
@schwinghamer@mstdn.social avatar

Hello Mastodon, I know that a lot of you discuss the high environmental cost (such as energy use and water use) of AI and I hope that some of you could reply with authoritative publications/links regarding this problem! I want to try to convince an environmental science colleague

avandeursen, to stackoverflow
@avandeursen@mastodon.acm.org avatar

At CHI earlier this month: “Is Stack Overflow Obsolete? An Empirical Study of the
Characteristics of ChatGPT Answers to Stack Overflow Questions”.

> Our analysis shows that 52% of ChatGPT answers contain incorrect information and 77% are verbose.

> … our user study participants … overlooked the misinformation in the ChatGPT answers 39% of the time.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642596

br00t4c, to ChatGPT
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

ChatGPT is wrong a lot when it answers programming questions, study says

https://qz.com/chatgpt-answers-wrong-programming-openai-study-1851500242

br00t4c, to ChatGPT
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

ChatGPT Answers Programming Questions Incorrectly 52% of the Time: Study

#chatgpt #openai

https://gizmodo.com/chatgpt-answers-wrong-programming-openai-52-study-1851499417

gtbarry, to journalism
@gtbarry@mastodon.social avatar

Sam Altman's OpenAI signs content agreement with News Corp

OpenAI has signed a deal that will give it access to content from some of the biggest news publications owned by media conglomerate News Corp

https://www.reuters.com/technology/sam-altmans-openai-signs-content-agreement-with-news-corp-2024-05-22/

br00t4c, to ChatGPT
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
bornach, to ai
@bornach@masto.ai avatar

[Coffeezilla] exposes as an overhyped product whose hardcoded architecture cannot possibly deliver the features advertised in their glossy launch video. Its was not a new but just a bunch of scripts
https://youtu.be/zLvFc_24vSM

br00t4c, to ChatGPT
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • cubers
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines