ByrdNick, to Neuroscience
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

Great news!

🧠 Brains is now on Mastodon!

URL: fediscience.org/@Brains

Handle: @Brains

Since 2005, the Brains blog has been a leading forum for philosophy and science of mind: philosophyofbrains.com

A decade later we added a YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@PhilosophyOfBrains

Our roundtable discussions, book symposia, debates, featured scholars, and other content reaches 1000s of people each week.

Join us!

@neuromatch

bruno_nicenboim, to cogsci
@bruno_nicenboim@fediscience.org avatar

Reminder that we (@mvugt @fusaroli) are organizing a workshop on Cognitive modeling of complex behavior (8-12 Jan 2024, Leiden)

We invite domain experts in cognitive science domains (with stats and programming knowledge). The workshop will consist of hands-on group projects between experienced modelers and domain experts.

Apply by registering: https://www.lorentzcenter.nl/cognitive-modeling-of-complex-behavior.html
Deadline: 1 Nov, 2023
(Free to attend, but participants need to cover travel and accommodation expenses.)

@cognition @cogsci

bruno_nicenboim,
@bruno_nicenboim@fediscience.org avatar
JeroenSH, to Futurology
@JeroenSH@lingo.lol avatar

Department of and faculty members Ev Fedorenko, Ted Gibson, and Roger Levy believe they can answer a fundamental question: What is the purpose of ? | MIT News

https://news.mit.edu/2023/re-imagining-our-theories-of-language-0922

petersuber, (edited ) to random
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Nature reports on the controversy caused by an open letter (signed by 124 notable researchers) describing Integrated Information Theory () as pseudoscience.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-02971-1

But it doesn't link to the letter. Why not?

(FYI, there are these cool new things called hyperlinks, great for reporting on debates, sharing multiple perspectives, supporting one's claims, giving due credit, and saving reader time.)

Here's the open letter.
https://psyarxiv.com/zsr78/

Private
bruno_nicenboim,
@bruno_nicenboim@fediscience.org avatar

@ERDonnachie @cogsci yeah, it is provocative. And it's clear (at least to me) that the model cannot be thing itself. IMO, the model needs to be as complex as needed and as simple as possible. (And "needed" here is doing a lot of work and it really depends on what is the purpose of the model). I don't think that simplicity for the sake of simplicity is useful in modeling. (Especially in , I know less about medical research)

ByrdNick, to Neuroscience
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

Interested in today’s one-page, 100+ signatory letter arguing that Integrated Information Theory of is “pseudoscience”?

Then you’re probably interested in the 4-part series we had about on the Brains blog earlier this week: https://philosophyofbrains.com/2023/09/10/this-week-jonathan-birch-and-hedda-hassel-morch-on-the-science-of-consciousness.aspx

bruno_nicenboim, to Cognition
@bruno_nicenboim@fediscience.org avatar

@fusaroli @mvugt and me are organizing a Lorentz Centre "Cognitive Modeling of Complex behaviour" hands-on workshop in January 2024. Check the call and join us (early career especially welcome): https://www.lorentzcenter.nl/cognitive-modeling-of-complex-behavior.html

@cognition @psycholinguistics @linguistics
@psychology
@cogsci

MattCrumpLab, to Cognition
@MattCrumpLab@fosstodon.org avatar

Running tutorials for undergrads on jsPsych this semester. Just made a course blog with screencasts that will be updated weekly this semester. Sharing in case it's useful for others.

https://www.crumplab.com/psyc2001/blog.html

MattCrumpLab, to Cognition
@MattCrumpLab@fosstodon.org avatar

I'm looking for review papers on the general topic of memory for pictures. I've found some pre 1990s, but haven't found review papers after that...(except Madigan, 2014). Any picture folks know of some?

bruno_nicenboim, to python
@bruno_nicenboim@fediscience.org avatar

Jozsef Arato has translated Chapters 1- 5 of (my + @ShravanVasishth + Daniel Schad) Intro to Bayes for Cog Sci (https://vasishth.github.io/bayescogsci/)

You can find it here:
https://github.com/jozsarato/bayescogdat

@cognition @cogsci

ninokadic, to philosophy
@ninokadic@mastodon.social avatar

I'm fairly confident that I won't be writing on panpsychism again any time soon... My interests switched to reevaluating physicalism again, especially in connection with cognitive science and empirically-informed approaches to consciousness in a broader sense. I don't have a strong opinion on which position is 'true' - and maybe that's bad for a philosopher - I just go by what I find worthy of further investigation 🤷🏻‍♂️

@philosophy @cogsci @cognition

ByrdNick, to random
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

How do we know what participants thought when we presented our stimuli?

can reveal what people saw (e.g., eye-tracking), consciously thought (e.g., concurrent think-aloud), etc.

Combining those two methods revealed:
(1) thinking aloud didn't impact gaze or word count
(2) retrospective think-aloud left out thoughts that were mentioned concurrently
(3) retrospective think-aloud introduced thoughts unmentioned concurrently

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14956-1_5

image/png
image/png
image/png

veronicayan, to ukteachers

I'm excited to share that I've been awarded an NSF CAREER grant. This means that over the next 5 years, I'm really going to be able to dive deep and focus on motivating effective strategies to transform student learning.

Also, I'm recruiting for new PhD students, so please share with any potential students who are interested in bridging cognitive, metacognitive, and socio-motivational processes to enhance learning!

stancarey, to evolution
tomstafford, to psychology
@tomstafford@mastodon.online avatar

Magisterial thread on meta-analysis of "growth mindset" studies, from Brooke Macnamara. tl;dr don't pin high hopes on this effect being real or substantial

https://twitter.com/BrookeMacnamara/status/1683567828199424000

screenshot of tweets, follow link for text

jesparent, to psychology

We need better models (in cogsci, in psych, in human arenas) about this. (I'm working on some). There needs to be language for there to be literacy, and there needs to be artefacts in that language for the literacy to have relevance in the society. Many people are doing the work, and I'm excited for it. But the actual structure and means for these things will take care and effort to build properly.

ByrdNick, to Logic
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

Can the civic and rational benefits of discussion and argument mapping be combined?

Platforms like BCause and Kialo attempt to find out.

Here's a recent conference paper about the former: https://aclanthology.org/2023.sicon-1.5

image/png
image/png
image/png

ninokadic, to philosophy
@ninokadic@mastodon.social avatar

Are you able to form vivid images in your mind? How would you rate their vividness from 1 to 10? 🧠

@philosophy @philosophyofmind @cognition

ekmiller, to random
@ekmiller@fediscience.org avatar

Neurons forge direct physical connections to create functional networks. What drives these circuits and networks to come together? New evidence suggests that some of this coordination comes from electric fields.

Read more: https://mitbcs.info/v7z

adamdenoon,

@ekmiller Oh My Various Goddess Abstractions. This is so incredibly beautiful 😍
STDP reveals that timing reshapes connections.
This paper reveals how, and it's... musical.

The brain as an "instrument" takes on new meaning.

https://bcs.mit.edu/news/brain-networks-encoding-memory-come-together-electric-fields-study-finds

simulo, to languagelearning
@simulo@hci.social avatar

» Almost All Research on the Mind Is in English. That’s a Problem«

https://www.wired.com/story/language-mind-cognition-english-bias/

ByrdNick, to random
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de avatar

🤔 "causal information at decision time can lead to less accurate choices in domains that relate to existing knowledge".

Possible explanations: (a) fluency effect or (b) expertise reversal effect.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-0206-z

image/png
image/png
image/png

iiccsss, to random

International Interdisciplinary Computational Cognitive Science Summer School (, https://www.iiccsss.org) is an annual five-day summer school for computational students (but also for people from adjacent fields interested in computational approaches to brain and cognition). In 2023, IICCSSS will take place in Tübingen, Germany, September 11–15. We are looking forward to exciting talks and workshops, as well as a hackathon and a panel discussion!

davidstrohmaier, to ArtificialIntelligence

I put together a new post on transformers converging with cognition: https://dstrohmaier.com/Transformers-Converge-Cognition/

iiccsss, to random

International Interdisciplinary Computational Cognitive Science Summer School () is now on Mastodon! We are an annual five-day summer school for computational students (but also for people from adjacent fields interested in computational approaches to brain and cognition). In 2023, IICCSSS will take place in Tübingen, Germany, September 11–15. We have planned a number of exciting talks and workshops, as well as a hackathon! Registration is now open at https://www.iiccsss.org/registration

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • DreamBathrooms
  • everett
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • kavyap
  • ethstaker
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • tester
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines