manlius, to science Italian
@manlius@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Following up a previous post about the topic, here there is the second (and maybe the last one) essay. What is the technological singularity and is this a real issue? Again, a perspective from , with a travel through , slime molds and black-hole computers.

Share your !

https://manlius.substack.com/p/from-science-fiction-to-science-facts

silviamaggi, to UX
@silviamaggi@mastodon.design avatar

New in the Bad UX repository: Buffer’s invisible action.

https://github.com/silviamaggi/ux-bad/blob/main/buffer.md

blaise, to random
@blaise@hachyderm.io avatar

I like what @cvennevik says about tech debt
https://www.cvennevik.no/post/technical-debt-is-an-incomplete-model/
I have mentioned to @davefarley77 that the perspective on tech debt reflects an incomplete understanding of debt.
For example:
Secured vs unsecured
Simple vs compound interest
Fixed vs variable interest
Underlying vs derivative debt
Senior vs subordinate debt

Each of these reflect a decision with tradeoffs and benefits.

Has no one considered applying the kind of rigor we brought to, say, computational ?

jbzfn, to random
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

💪 Flexible systems | jordankaye.dev
"Given that many decisions will need to be adapted to changing requirements or unforeseen constraints, it is more prudent to focus on the ease of modifying decisions rather than striving for perfection at any given point. Taking this idea a step further involves identifying the fundamental properties that are believed to be resistant to change over time — Pareto’s “vital few”."



https://jordankaye.dev/posts/flexible-systems/

jbzfn, to random
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

👎 GraphQL: From Excitement to Deception
| Better Programming

"It’s really easy to understand how GraphQL solves Facebook problems. The remaining question is, “Does it solve yours?”



https://betterprogramming.pub/graphql-from-excitement-to-deception-f81f7c95b7cf

oritpeleg, to random

Exciting news! ✨ My TEDx talk is finally online! Join me in the mesmerizing world of firefly communication and synchronization!

Hope you enjoy watching it: https://lnkd.in/gS3cQRPH ❤️

Huge thanks to the talented photographers Radim Photo, Pete Mauney, and Mac Stone for graciously allowing me to showcase their stunning footage 💛 💚 💙

image/png

eric, to Quotes
@eric@social.coop avatar

“A system must consist of three kinds of things: elements, interconnections, and a
function or purpose.”
@ethics

eric,
@eric@social.coop avatar

“A single persuasive leader working directly on and can shift the functioning of a massive system. So can a leader who opens up or closes down, speeds up or slows down, distorts or clarifies information flows.”
@ethics

emill1984, to esport Polish
@emill1984@101010.pl avatar

Trofeum przed finalem wniosl Jason , szef i zalozyciel organizacji

IMO bardzo ladny gest ze strony organizatorow, bo Jason jest jednym z najwiekszych pasjonatow i zajawkowiczow CS-a, ktory mimo pasma niepowodzen dalej stoi murem za swoja organizacja - do tej pory pamietam, jak ogladal walke Complexity w MCK Katowice w 2019 roku, z trybun, z widzami i przezywal kazdego fraga - zaszczyt wniesienia trofeum czesciej powinien przypadac takim ludziom, niz politykom 🙃

@esport

sapiens, to science

It's a know phenomena of self-organization in birds and an example in emerging phenomena in complexity:
How do flocking birds move in unison?
https://earthsky.org/earth/how-do-flocking-birds-move-in-unison/
"We’ve all seen flocks of birds wheeling and swooping in unison, as if choreographed. How do they do this? Zoologists say they aren’t simply following a leader or their neighbors. If they were, the reaction time of each bird would need to be very fast. In fact, it would have to be faster than birds can react, according to scientists who’ve studied the reaction times of individual birds in laboratory settings."
-organization

leahdriel, to random
@leahdriel@fediscience.org avatar

I'm going to attempt to do something kind of different with my thesis; people will be able to go through it as an interactive experiment. If you'd like to muck around in the unknown for research, I'll be putting out a call for study participants this fall if all goes to plan. In the meantime, I'd like to put this out into the world: Hawthorn, my thesis' big idea translated into a game.

jbzfn, to random
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

"With every additional character you type, you're increasing the likelihood of a mistake.

This is true when it comes to typos, sure. But typos tend to be easy to catch and fix. The really troublesome bugs — the ones that tend to break user experiences for weeks as developers pass the support ticket around like a hot potato — are often caused by too much complexity, not too many characters."
➥ Josh Comeau


https://www.joshwcomeau.com/career/clever-code-considered-harmful/

joshuagrochow, to random
@joshuagrochow@mathstodon.xyz avatar

Is there an "addition function" that works simultaneously for the determinant and the permanent?

There is a simple function that is multiplicative for both the determinant and permanent simultaneously, namely (\det(A \oplus B) = \det(A)\det(B)) and (perm(A \oplus B)=perm(A)perm(B)).

The map (A,B \mapsto A \oplus B) is a projection in Valiant's sense - every coordinate of the output is either one of the input coordinates or a constant.

Perm and det both have "addition functions" separately. They are slightly more complicated, but still projections. That is, there are projections f,g such that det(f(A,B))=det(A) + det(B) [Malod & Portier, Prop 7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jco.2006.09.006] and perm(g(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B) [see https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/a/51348/129].

But is there a single projection h such that

det(h(A,B)) = det(A) + det(B)
and
perm(h(A,B)) = perm(A) + perm(B)
?

I don't know, but would love to find out!

https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/q/51370/129

jimcarroll, (edited ) to random
@jimcarroll@futurist.info avatar

Morning mood: the CNN situation makes it pretty clear that as Canadians, we're going to have to think about what it is going to be like living next to a brutal dictatorship with the disappearance of the rule of law, complete compromise of the courts, and probably mass executions, prison camps, and a flood of refugees coming to our border. It seems inevitable that this is where America is headed. We are witnessing the death of democracy in real-time. The media is once again going to aid and abet it's destruction in a race for ratings

As you might guess, I'm in a pretty pissy mood this morning.

aadmaa,
@aadmaa@mathstodon.xyz avatar

@jimcarroll @aadmaa I share the general sentiment of your fine mornings' rant, as well as your concern that some worst-case outcomes are absolutely possible. But I do think positive outcomes are also possible, and even more likely than the negative. I think ,y sense of US politics is a bit different from yours - and in particular I don't buy that a black swan event is needed to to bring America back from the Trump era.

I believe we can draw an analogy to time series analysis of ECG or EEG data. When you are about to have certain types of cardiac events or seizures, the dimensionality of the space drops. The can signal loses its complexity and become very simple, like going from an orchestral concert to the simplicity of a dull, regular drum beat. THUD THUD THUD THUD... And then, cue the cardiac event/seizure.

The dimensionality of the space of US political discourse can be measured as a behavior. (See e.g. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2205791119 - check out "A General Definition of Dimensionality in Behavior") You'd see that the dimensionality has collapsed - i.e., the number of functions of past behavior needed to predict future behavior becomes very low. Because you can predict way too much knowing way too little.

In this sense exactly, I believe what's been happening in US politics is analogous to a seizure or a heart attack: the orchestral complexity has collapsed into a dull THUD, THUD of very low dimension. And while a seizure can kill us, can hurt us, it's quite likely that we survive, and that after it passes as a seizure does, complexity of thought will reemerge naturally. Because we are many thoughtful, creative, independent/dependent/interdependent minds after all.

joshuagrochow, to random
@joshuagrochow@mathstodon.xyz avatar

The list of papers accepted to the Computational Complexity Conference 2023 is now posted: https://computationalcomplexity.org/Archive/2023/accept.php

mluczak, to science

What an exciting new project at Vermont Complex Systems Center on "The "Science of Online Corpora, Knowledge, and Stories" https://twitter.com/uvmcomplexity/status/1655641692957990914. A thread about why we @c2Lab are curious about this topic too. 1/n

i_dabble, to random

The game of Go has no hidden information, it's just so complex that the human mind cannot comprehend it all at once. I think that's what makes it so beautiful. The rules are as simple as they possibly can be. At the same time, there is practically no limit to improving in it.

jbzfn, to random
@jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

「 A common trap we have in software design comes from focusing on how "simple" we find it to read and interpret a given piece of code. Focusing on simplicity is fraught with peril because complexity can't be removed: it can just be shifted around. If you move it out of your code, where does it go? 」
@mononcqc


https://ferd.ca/complexity-has-to-live-somewhere.html

Foxside, to linguistics

Hello, everyone! (Well, @taalumot... I have no other followers yet.)

I guess it's considered polite to introduce yourself.

My interests:
and (particularly for the humanities)




And I will chat endlessly with anyone about and

I play and love drills.

dderigo, to random

1/

book [1] by @deevybee "As we shall see, demonstrating that an intervention has an impact is much harder than it appears at first sight"

https://mastodon.social/@deevybee/110118670777140484

"Much of the attention of methodologists has focused on how to recognize and control for unwanted factors that can affect outcomes of interest. But psychology is also important: it tells us that own human biases can be just as important in leading us astray"

dderigo,

7/

[4] Markowitz, E.M., Shariff, A.F., 2012. Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change 2, 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1378
(free access versions: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=16185075099533110886 )

matthewskelton, to random
@matthewskelton@mastodon.social avatar

Superb talk by James Lewis on Team Topologies, Software Architecture & Complexity at GOTO 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izLg4NkJQO4

costrike, to sustainability
@costrike@mastodon.social avatar
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • DreamBathrooms
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • provamag3
  • Durango
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tester
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • khanakhh
  • modclub
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines