Replies

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

shoq, to random
@shoq@mastodon.social avatar

For all that it did right, Mastodon made a massive unforced error not realizing that the key to social media propagation was keeping journalists happy. Instead, it alienated 90% of them with grievances and brow beatings about how they were pesky interlopers. BlueSky and Threads merely had to toss them a handful of candy, and promise them others, and it was like flipping a switch that sucked them out of here like runaway ShopVac. But I am convinced that many can be brought back.

vetehinen,

@shoq are you sure Bluesky is doing any better in this regard. It seems like lots of journalist accounts have gone dormant there as well when the initial hype died down.

Meanwhile Threads has probably been the most successful despite them at times seemingly working actively against the news media. I think it might be just a case of journalists following the big numbers.

shoq, to random
@shoq@mastodon.social avatar

@mmasnick always brings coherence to our social media dramas. Maybe now more will better understand why some of us remain excited for the potential of “protocols over platforms.”

“Bluesky Is Building The Decentralized Social Media Jack Dorsey Wants, Even If He Doesn’t Realize It.”

https://www.techdirt.com/2024/05/13/bluesky-is-building-the-decentralized-social-media-jack-dorsey-wants-even-if-he-doesnt-realize-it

vetehinen,

@shoq "competition is good" is one of those things that often gets repeated in our capitalist society but isn't some kind of an absolute that holds no matter the circumstances. Competition is good in some contexts but cooperation is better in some others.

vetehinen,

@shoq Well, in this context I think it is pretty easy to make a case for competition not necessarily being a positive.

vetehinen,

@shoq Funny, I can easily come up with a few arguments and probably more if I gave it a little thought:

  • standards only happen when people agree to work together to make them instead of creating 20 competing ones (like in that XKCD strip)
  • splitting up a userbase in something where the network effect deeply matters might just hand your centralized and closed off competition the win so you probably should consider long and hard whether the benefits from doing it are worth it
  • limited resources are better spent working on something together rather than reinventing it many times

You don't have to agree but I find it very surprising that you're saying you can't even see it.

noellemitchell, to ai
@noellemitchell@mstdn.social avatar

Internet Horrified at AI App for Cloning Dead Family Members

"It's unclear what kind of data Vera AI uses to teach its chatbots. A previous version of the app's Google Play page noted that the app has access to the "contents of your USB storage" including "photos, media, and files.""

https://futurism.com/internet-horrified-app-cloning-family-members

vetehinen,

@noellemitchell They just went ahead and literally copied their business idea from a Black Mirror episode.

philippsteinkrueger, (edited ) to random
@philippsteinkrueger@zirk.us avatar

It's brilliant that @snarfed.org@snarfed.org's bridge is now in beta. But now everyone has to activate their bridge. At the moment it's really hard to find people to follow on Bluesky...

vetehinen,

@philippsteinkrueger Are you looking for Bluesky users to follow from the fediverse? You can see everyone that has enabled the bridge on Bluesky from here https://bsky.app/profile/ap.brid.gy/followers

wjmaggos, to bluesky
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Give me some of your favorite accounts we are now able to follow on #BlueSky. please...

vetehinen,

@wjmaggos you're probably asking too early, I've seen basically no high profile ones (it is possible to browse the full list of people who are following the bridge bot directly on Bluesky)

elCelio, to mastodon Italian
@elCelio@mastodon.uno avatar

Most followed accounts:

  1. threads.net
  2. threads.net
  3. threads.net
  4. threads.net
  5. threads.net
  6. Mastodon@mastodon.social
  7. threads.net
  8. threads.net
  9. georgetakei@universeodon.com
  10. threads.net
  11. threads.net
  12. Gargron@mastodon.social
  13. threads.net
  14. threads.net
  15. neilhimself@mastodon.social
  16. rbreich@masto.ai
  17. threads.net
  18. threads.net
  19. threads.net
  20. threads.net

Source:
https://most-followed-mastodon-accounts.stefanhayden.com/

video/mp4

vetehinen,

@elCelio well the name of the list is obviously outdated (and was not really accurate to begin with since listed accounts even outside of threads are not all mastodon) but the good thing is that there's now all these big threads accounts that we can follow without having to use threads. I guess it also speaks for how large the threads userbase unfortunately is in comparison.

tokyo_0, to meta
@tokyo_0@mas.to avatar

A lot of people have insisted isn't getting involved with the to embrace, extend and extinguish it...

... but even before fully implementing Fediverse interoperability in they're already talking openly about changing its protocols to add features like monetization. 🤔

https://techcrunch.com/2024/04/25/why-meta-is-looking-to-the-fediverse-as-the-future-for-social-media/

Text in a screenshot reads as follows: McCue riffed on the idea that fediverse users could become creators where some of their content became available to subscribers only, similar to how Patreon works. For instance, fediverse advocate and co-editor of ActivityPub Evan Prodromou created a paid Mastodon account (@evanplus) that users could subscribe to for $5 per month to gain access. If he’s on board with paid content, surely others would follow. Cottle agreed that the model could work with the fediverse, too. He additionally suggested there are ways the fediverse could monetize beyond donations, which is what often powers various efforts today, like Mastodon. Cottle said someone might even make a fediverse experience that consumers would pay for, the way some fediverse client apps are paid today.

vetehinen,

@tokyo_0 it seems like the quote post controls are probably something they've been coordinating with Mastodon, actually. I think it was @tchambers I saw say first that a very similar feature is coming for Mastodon and having followed the quote post discussions in the issue queues for Mastodon a bit I know these kinds of controls were extensively discussed there as a requirement for adding QPs in the past.

mackuba, to bluesky
@mackuba@martianbase.net avatar

So apparently we've hit that 30% chance after all and #Bluesky didn't die before they allowed a bridge to run, who'd have guessed? 🤔

Somebody plz ping Evan about this - I'm not on Threads, I don't like commercial social media platforms 😈

vetehinen,

@mackuba what's your point? guessing this isn't that recent and I'm not sure 30% was a particularly unrealistic prediction considering most startups fail and we've already seen multiple twitter replacements fail too.

Good on Bluesky not having run out of money yet but I certainly don't think they've yet really found a good way to monetize or a big enough userbase so the clock is absolutely still ticking on that VC money requiring them to put up or shut it.

vetehinen,

@mackuba also, I'm sure you know @evan has a non-threads fediverse account too even though he happened to post that message to threads so there is no need to ping him on threads only.

aral, to mastodon
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Co-founder of Twitter joins new Mastodon board of directors. Right, so federating with Threads wasn’t a mistake. This is just the direction Mastodon is going. Oh, well. Another Mozilla emerges.

https://blog.joinmastodon.org/2024/04/mastodon-forms-new-u.s.-non-profit/

vetehinen,

@FinchHaven @aral what on earth makes you say they are raking in shit tons of money? That doesn't sound too likely for a team with the grand total of two full-time deveopers (to be increased to three now) so do you have something to back that with?

sharan, to Bulgaria
@sharan@metalhead.club avatar

The Balkan web community is still pretty active on Twitter. Some of them tried to go to Bluesky, but it didn't work.

On the other hand, 90% of the community would be banned on Fediverse because of their retrograde, right-wing stances.

And it should stay that way.

#Balkan #Twitter #SocialMedia #Bluesky #Mastodon

vetehinen,

@sharan what's the reason people with such politics want to leave Xitter?

maegul, (edited ) to ghost
@maegul@hachyderm.io avatar

I think the and federations pose interesting questions about what platforms can and should be.

Do we actually want blogs and feeds of blogs folded into a mastodon/microblog social feed?

Do we want to read and comment on blogs on mastodon?

Do we want all the diversity of the fediverse fed into a single platform's UI and hope that it works well?

Are we worried that some choices by our platform or instance admin might hinder this process?

I'm rather skeptical.

1/

vetehinen,

@Loukas Where we differ is that I don't think the issue is that it can't be usefully represented on here, just that it currently isn't. Why do you think it can't rather than isn't? @maegul

vetehinen,

@Loukas @maegul well for me it could be as trivial as just being able to filter the replies from the top level posts when looking at a group's feed. Much more involved plans have also been drafted though, like this one: https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/19059

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • ethstaker
  • Durango
  • GTA5RPClips
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • vwfavf
  • osvaldo12
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • Leos
  • tacticalgear
  • anitta
  • normalnudes
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines