An alle, die heute klaren Himmel haben: Ihr solltet ihr mal wieder nach Polarlicht gucken. Da ist aktuell ein Materieauswurf von der Sonne angekommen und rüttelt ein bisschen am irdischen Magnetfeld.
"When your mind is wandering, your brain’s 'default mode' network is active. Its discovery 20 years ago inspired a raft of research into networks of brain regions and how they interact with each other."
Accept, Add, Announce, Block, Create, Delete, Flag, Follow, Like, Move, Reject, Remove, Undo, Update are widespread, used by Mastodon, Pleroma etc
Dislike used by Lemmy
Arrive, Leave, Invite, Join, TentativeReject, TentativeAccept are used by Streams (at least according to the docs)
Offer used by Mitra
View used by PeerTube
The only activities I've never seen are Ignore, Listen, Question, Read and Travel
Some weeks ago I submitedd a pull request to the https://github.com/w3c/activitystream repository regarding the OWL representation of the ActivityStream vocabulary. As discussed in the last Issue Triage, these changes need reviews from Semantic Web expert. They are just few subclass assertions which aim to capture the activity subclasses definitions reported in
Die Anzeige der Kommentare und Likes scheint grad irgendwie kaputt zu sein.
Ein Beitrag von mir in der /network Timeline zeigt das an:
Es stimmt die Anzahl der Kommentare in der Buttonleiste mit der Anzahl der Kommentare zum Aufklappen nicht zusammen.
Dann steht 135 Reshares beim Button für Reshare und "37 Menschen teilten dies erneut"
Beim Likebutton steht gar nix, dafür 177 Daumen-hoch reactions und "45 Menschen mögen dies".
Da mir die Anzeige sowieso seltsam vorkam, da ich vorhin (ich hab grad wieder ein git pull auf 2023.09-rc gemacht) 177 Likes und 135 reshares auch in den beiden Zeilen darunter stehen hatte, wo jetzt 45 und 37 steht, Bin ich dem nachgegangen.
Rufe ich den selben Beitrag direkt auf, dann zeigt er mir folgendes:
Es wären 177 Thumb-up Reactions kein Like, und "176 Menschen mögen das". Auch bei den Reshares stimmt die Anzahl um 1 nicht zusammen. Auch die Anzahl der Kommentare neben dem Kommentar-button stimmt nicht mit den tatsächlichen Kommentaren überein.
My only complaint about my #AppleWatch and Apple’s #activity tracking is actually on this type of #workout: not enough flexibility to customize. So you can’t toggle GPS on/off for an interval workout, for example, or create a workout for yourself. But minor quibbles in the scheme of things…
Could we not use this same tactic? I would love to see a Terms of Use drafted that requires federation participants to fully support the project. It could prohibit partial implementations, especially if extensions to the standard were being added before fully supporting the standard. Actions that seem to use embrace, extend, extinguish tactics could be explicitly called out and forbidden.
What is a “partial implementation”? We’re coming from a Lemmy perspective here. Would an instance that doesn’t have down votes be a partial implementation? I don’t think that any system currently running implements all of the Activity Types described in ActivityStreams - you can’t Dislike on Mastodon and the “Travel” event looks like something for a Foursquare clone rather than Lemmy or Mastodon. Surveys look like they could be implemented under the Question type… though I haven’t seen any implement that.
Support for specific extended vocabulary types is expected to vary, with implementations only selecting the extended types and properties that make sense within the specific context and requirements of those applications. However, to avoid possible interoperability issues, implementations must avoid using extension types or properties that unduly overlap with or duplicate the extended vocabulary defined here.
In Activity Streams 2.0, an “extension” is any property, activity, actor or object type not defined by the Activity Vocabulary. Consuming implementations that encounter unfamiliar extensions must not stop processing or signal an error and must continue processing the items as if those properties were not present. Note that support for extensions can vary across implementations and no normative processing model for extensions is defined. Accordingly, implementations that rely too heavily on the use of extensions may experience reduced interoperability with other implementations.
As much as embrace, extend, extinguish is to be feared, extend is designed into the protocol as being a good thing and allow new structures to be stood up and explored rather than having the spec locked down. The protocol doesn’t care about the motives of the entity that stood up a new instance.
“One of the major drawbacks of e-mail was that it is mostly insecure (i.e. delivered in plaintext) and unauthenticated... Thanks to the identity technology of the Social Web, she is now able to verify whether or not she is communicating with another user or not, and thanks to the identity and profile management in her browser, she even by default uses public key encryption to encrypt her messages and social media she sends to her friends if needed”
(2005) https://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/XGR-socialweb-20101206/#Activity
If you click on the "more" button under a comment or link there will be an activity tab. In this tab you can see everyone who has boosted, favourited or reduced the post. I'm not sure if this a...
So what happens with 300 people downvote a post and 500 upvote it? For that to work you'd need an 'account' per post/vote/user combination. Now your instance has 1000's of bot accounts that are now indistinguishable from bad vote manipulation.
ActivityPub broadcasts all these activity types. It's how it works. You can't federate these things without, well, federating them.
Im Umfeld der #META Diskussion scheint es wieder ein größeres Interesse an #disapora zu geben. Ein Fediverse Projekte, dass vielen hier unbekannt ist und dennoch eine breite Nutzerbasis genießt. Für viele #G+ Nutzende, was es die Fluchtburg, als das Projekt seinerzeit durch google gestoppt wurde. Aber auch schon davor war die Diaspora ein Zuhause für viele Enthusiasten, denen die private, persönliche Kommunikation wichtiger war, als der Hype und die Aufregungswellen, durch die sich die kommerziellen Plattformen auszeichnen. Daher gibt es, wie im gesamten Fediverse, auch dort keine Algorithmen, viele verschiedene Instanzen (Pod) und unterschiedliche Kulturen & Themen, die sich über Hashtags zusammen finden.
Anders als die meisten Projekte im Fediverse nutzt Diaspora kein#activity-pub als Protokoll, sonder einen eigenen Standard und segelt damit unterhalb der Sichtlinie von Facebook. Damit bildet es ein eigenständiges Netzwerk ohne Mastodon, Lemmy oder andere AP basierende Fediverse Projekte. Lediglich #Friendica und #Hubzilla sind in der Lage mit diesen Netzwerk zu kommunizieren, was damit zusammen hängt, dass diese Projekte neben AP, den eigenen Protokollen auch das Diaspora Protokoll unterstützten und damit den ursprünglichen Gedanken des Fediverse weiter leben lassen.
Die Diaspora existiert bereits seit 2010 und ist damit weit aus älter, als die meisten Projekte im restlichen Fediverse. Weitere Infos findet ihr hier: dewiki.de/Lexikon/Diaspora_(So…
I will say the #Activity changes in #WatchOS looks really nice, and makes it a lot easier to use rather than viewing the data on my iPhone. That should be great.
Doing some initial research on becoming an #ActivityPub implementor. Does my app have to listen to every single Activity type in order to be considered compliant?
What areas of knowledge or expertise or skill or activity do you feel you’re on the “inside” of, and which do you consider you’re somewhat connected to but you’re on the “outside” of?
@kojote Mastodon, #Pleroma oder #Calckey oder andere heissen ja "Microblogging" Plattformen. Wenn es längere Texte sind, wie bei einem "normalen" Blog, kann man #Writefreely, #Friendica oder andere nehmen oder auch Wordpress mit dem #Activity Plugin. Das #Fediverse bietet so viel!
@cr0ax@john well, the #fediverse would still be less than 10 percent of the size of #Twitter (which is around 486M last stats I looked at). But that's arguably debatable since some estimates say that only about 25 percent of twitters users create around 90 percent of the content... That's
still over 120M users, or three times the size the Fediverse would be if #Tumblr adds #Activity pub.
House Passes Johnson’s Plan to Avert Shutdown in Bipartisan Vote (www.nytimes.com)
Threads and the Fediverse
Start by reading these two articles:...
PSA: every interaction you make with various posts on kbin is viewable to everyone.
If you click on the "more" button under a comment or link there will be an activity tab. In this tab you can see everyone who has boosted, favourited or reduced the post. I'm not sure if this a...