markwyner, to america
@markwyner@mas.to avatar

U.S. Senator Dick Durbin has introduced a joint resolution to codify voting rights in America.

https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/senate-majority-whip-durbin-reintroduces-constitutional-amendment-to-codify-the-right-to-vote/

It’s one of the most important resolutions on the docket. Without our voting rights fascism is all but a sure thing. Voter suppression is rooted in racism.

YusufToropov, to northcarolina
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar
YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted essential parts of the Voting Rights Act, allowing GOP legislatures to enact some of the most racially discriminatory district maps in state history.

@uspolitics @blackvoices @DemocracyMattersALot

2/10

YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

Last year, a federal judge in Georgia ruled that GOP-drawn maps were discriminatory and unlawful because they diluted Black voting power and ignored the state’s growing Black population.

[

@uspolitics @blackvoices @DemocracyMattersALot

3/10

YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar
YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

In North Carolina, voting rights advocates filed suit charging GOP legislators with racially gerrymandering the state House and Senate maps by deliberately diluting the voting power of majority-Black areas.

@uspolitics @blackvoices @DemocracyMattersALot

5/10

YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

And in Louisiana, a federal court determined that GOP-created maps violated the Voting Rights Act by weakening the power of Black voters. The state was ordered to finalize a new map
early this year.

@uspolitics @blackvoices @DemocracyMattersALot

6/10

YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar

Recently in Alabama, the Republican legislature refused to comply with a federal judge’s order to create fair voting maps that better represented Black voters. It had to be enforced by court order.

@uspolitics @blackvoices @DemocracyMattersALot

7/10

YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar
YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar
YusufToropov,
@YusufToropov@toot.community avatar
petersuber, to USpolitics
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

From @lessig and @matt_seligman: "In the year after President Biden took office in 2021, 18 states passed 34 voting restriction laws. Many of these new laws became possible because the [] decision in 2013 in Shelby County v. Holder struck down key provisions of the . Every one of the laws passed the state legislature on a party-line [] vote."
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2024/03/election-theft-101-foster-skepticism/

blogdiva, to random
@blogdiva@mastodon.social avatar

so 57,000 democrats voted in Michigan told Biden to stop supporting ? y'all know he barely Georgia (or was it Arizona) with less than 20K votes, right?

57,000 for Michigan is a big fucking swing vote.

we know these are bullshit. blocked all contenders to manufacture these phony victories. so stop the "he's crushing it".

Biden doesn't have a 2024 mandate... yet.

BUT! the best news? looks like more Dems are voting in primaries than MAGA fash.

blogdiva,
@blogdiva@mastodon.social avatar

STOP SPREADING THIS FUCKING LIE

❝ People whined about Hillary and stayed home or voted 3rd party and we got Trump ❞

WE HAD RECORD-BREAKING VOTING IN 2016, AND MORE PEOPLE VOTED FOR CLINTON THAN TRUMP

you know what's a fact the whites often forget about 2016?

2016 WERE THE FIRST ELECTIONS AFTER THE ROBERTS COURT GUTTED THE

2016 was perfect for republicans to use ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTES to steal, yet again, elections.

SCOTUS got us Trump

@Seilenos @msbellows

indigo8s, to random
@indigo8s@mastodon.social avatar

"🚨 Republicans go public with NIGHTMARE attack", nationwide

"Democracy Watch episode 85: Marc Elias discusses a raft of Republican states lining up behind Brad Raffensperger's plan to gut the Voting Rights Act."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9wiICxlsLA

KimPerales, to random
@KimPerales@toad.social avatar

Big-time voter suppression in Texas *the state makes it difficult to register, limits voting accessibility, & uses gerrymandering, corrupt schemes...

"It took me three tries to register to vote. I'm still thinking about how not everyone has the ability, the time, the resources to ask questions, double-check their reg. status, & make multiple attempts. Being able to participate in democracy should not be this hard-."

#VoterSuppression #GOPSabotage #VotingRightsAct

https://www.texastribune.org/2024/02/13/exas-voter-registration-election-2024/

marcelias, to random
@marcelias@mas.to avatar

If you live in one of these 20 states, your Republican Attorney General is trying to eviscerate private enforcement of the Voting Right Act in court.

AL, AR, AK, FL, GA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, MS, MO, MT, ND, NE, OK, SC, TX, UT, WV

ArenaCops,

@marcelias 😎 Looks like a collective confession of "Republican" Attorneys General.

Which the co-founder of the Republican Party, Abraham Lincoln wouldn't have approved, I'm sure.

Lincoln's creed: "Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

Today's "Republican" Attorneys General (from ex- & neo-Confederate states) evidently disagree.

Spiggitzfan, to random
@Spiggitzfan@mstdn.social avatar
ginaintheburg, to random
@ginaintheburg@mastodon.world avatar

Charles Coleman Jr in for Velshi had an imp discussion abt another challenge to Voting Rts Act

Clearly, citizens must be able to sue to protect their civil rts & not delegate the rt to sue exclusively to .

What were they thinking?

We know the answer to that: nothing good.

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/20/1152732216/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-section-2-private-right-of-action

kegill, to TeslaMotors
@kegill@mastodon.social avatar
TheConversationUS, to USpolitics
@TheConversationUS@newsie.social avatar

An appeals court ruling in an Arkansas case could make it impossible for groups like the ACLU to file lawsuits to protect citizens’ right to vote – significantly changing how the has been interpreted so far.

A constitutional law professor expects, since the ruling disagrees with other rulings, that the Supreme Court will hear the case.

https://theconversation.com/who-can-defend-voting-rights-an-appeals-court-ruling-sharply-limiting-lawsuits-looks-likely-to-head-to-the-supreme-court-218296

cdarwin, to random
@cdarwin@c.im avatar

The St. Louis-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit found in a 2-1 ruling Monday that only the U.S. Attorney General is authorized to sue states and municipalities under Section 2 of the , which prohibits discriminatory voting practices on the basis of race, color or other protected characteristics.

The ruling bars groups like the NAACP from asking the courts to enforce the law

The decision is likely to be appealed to the and, if allowed to stand, could severely undermine enforcement of the 1965 John Fritze reports.

Currently, the ruling applies to seven states, including Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/11/21/new-appeals-court-ruling-tees-voting-rights-act/71670193007/

Nonilex, to legal
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The appeals court on Mon drastically weakened the , ruling only the govt could bring a challenge under §2 of the , effectively barring private citizens & groups from filing , a crucial part of the that prohibits or practices that against based on .

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/20/us/politics/voting-rights-act.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

KatM, to random
@KatM@mastodon.social avatar

😖 Awesome. :yikes:

The Voting Rights Act Is in Big Trouble

"If allowed to stand, the two [Trump appointed judiciary] rulings would gut the protections offered by the Voting Rights Act. Civil rights groups, individual voters, and political parties would not be able to challenge discriminatory voting practices. This includes redistricting gerrymandered maps and voter ID requirements."

Link: https://newrepublic.com/post/177051/voting-rights-act-big-trouble

ParanoidFactoid, to Law
@ParanoidFactoid@mastodon.social avatar

APPEALS COURT BLOCKS CITIZENS FROM FILING LAWSUITS UNDER VOTING RIGHTS ACT

For decades, private citizens and groups have been able to file claims under the to seek redress for racial and other rules violations. In Feb 2022, a Trump appointed judge reversed that, ruling only the Justice Department can file such claims. Now, a three judge panel on appeal upheld that lower court ruling.

https://www.npr.org/2023/11/20/1152732216/voting-rights-act-supreme-court-section-2-private-right-of-action

image/jpeg

GottaLaff, to legal
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Via Wendy Weiser

This radical 8th Cir decision would essentially gut the remaining nationwide protections of by preventing anyone other than DOJ from enforcing them. This is deeply wrong, and it goes against decades of precedent and practice.

Democracy Docket:
BREAKING: 8th Circuit severely weakens Section 2 of VRA in certain states by ruling that there is no private right of action under Sec 2. This means that only DOJ — not indivisible & orgs — can sue under Sec 2

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • osvaldo12
  • ngwrru68w68
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cisconetworking
  • khanakhh
  • ethstaker
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • megavids
  • lostlight
  • All magazines