ampersand, 11 months ago

@ivy Smartly written! I didn't think about the cw issue and that's definitely a big thing to keep in mind.

Another thing (which requires a giant CITATION NEEDED), I've seen a message floating around that any server that federates with threads would be subject to Facebook's content policies. And while there's nothing stopping an admin from being more strict, anything allowed on Fedi but not allowed on threads could get the short end.

ivy, 11 months ago

@ampersand thank youuuuuuu :bugcat_hearts:​

That would definitely be pretty wack if they moderated us without moderating themselves. Good thing we won't be federated to them at all :dracthyr_hehe:​

alex_the_average, 11 months ago

@ivy

@ampersand

Agreed, incredibly well written. I agree with your stance, but have been having trouble putting it quite this well!

ivy, 11 months ago

@alex_the_average @ampersand
thank you, I'm really glad you liked it :blobfox_blush:

it's sooo hard getting the ideas out but once I start, it just keeps flowing :cat_giggle:

Andres, 10 months ago

@ivy
Thanks for writing this, it's really well put and agree 💯
I have been talking mainly about two topics:

• The moderation offload by Meta and how I will not be working for them at any capacity.
• The technical ability for the :fediverse: instances (big and small) to cope with the influx of... user interactions.
  I wrote a technical report about the last point here:
  hardcoredevs.com/fediverse-interactions-and-their-consecuences/

ophiocephalic, 11 months ago

@ivy
I've added a link for your post to the Essays page on Free Fediverse!

https://freefediverse.org

ivy, 11 months ago

@ophiocephalic awesome! :blobfox_laugh_sweat:​

Swampwulf, 11 months ago

@ivy Well said.

ivy, 11 months ago

@Swampwulf :bugcat_hearts:​