@MartyFouts@mastodon.online
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

MartyFouts

@MartyFouts@mastodon.online

Retired software developer.
Amateur Classical Guitarist.
Exploring VCV rack.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

b0rk, to random
@b0rk@jvns.ca avatar

pretty happy with how the table of contents for "How Git Works" is looking

(if you want to get an email when the zine comes out, you can sign up here: https://wizardzines.com/zine-announcements/)

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@b0rk I have used git since the day Linus switched the kernel to it and I am really looking forward to this. It is going to be the best introduction to git so far.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@airfive @b0rk introduction was probably the wrong description. Overview might be a better description.

eniko, to random
@eniko@peoplemaking.games avatar

I will be so fucking glad when May is over. Love how the games industry has just decided to cram everything important into June. Just all of them. All in June. Could've spread it out across the year but nope. Gotta have it all in June for no fucking reason

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@eniko I used to be involved in consumer electronics product release scheduling and we always tried for June releases because of what the industry calls “dads and grads” in the US. June is the second busiest time of the year for retail because of Father’s Day and graduation presents but the range of things people buy is narrower than during the Christmas shopping season. I assume that the game industry has the same retail window.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@eniko which makes no sense as you already said. There’s a trade show component to cluster announcements in other industries like NAMM for music gear. Is there a big game show in June or did there used to be?

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@eniko Inertia is responsible for so many industry practices in so many industries. Look at the way CES never quite dies. I am surprised that indie developers don’t break away from June. I suppose the trade press is also geared toward to the schedule though.

patrickworld, to random
@patrickworld@mastodon.online avatar

Subtitles in movie theatres NOW. I will not back down on this

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@patrickworld around here there’s a theater that shows movies with subtitles. They give you a little device that attaches to your seat and can be adjusted so only you can see the display. It usually works well.

Alice, to random
@Alice@beige.party avatar

Countdown until we learn that Waymo is similar to those Amazon stores where the self-driving cars are actually controlled by offices full of people who are playing a variation of Mario Kart in order to get us to our destinations.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@Alice Waymo is operating under a program from CAL DMV that sets three classes of vehicles for them. Some areas require backup drivers in the vehicle, most require remote monitoring of the vehicle, while none yet allow unsupervised driving as far as I know. San Francisco is remotely monitored but the recent addition of Sunnyvale still requires drivers in the car. However Waymo does not remotely operate the vehicles unless there is an emergency.

DJDarren, to random
@DJDarren@mendeddrum.org avatar

It’s just been pointed out to me that the reason Apple runs a trade-in programme for older devices is so they can reduce the size of the used market, and has fuck all to do with recycling.

That’s blown my tiny mind.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@DJDarren Apple’s trade in prices are enough below market that the effect on second hand supply is negligible. Most of the devices that they destroy are either not repairable or models that are no longer supported. They should do a better job of removing and recovering material but they are not trying to reduce resale.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@DJDarren most phone resales are person to person without an intermediary but there are other channels than Facebook and even Apple sells its refurbished devices on the used market. There are several reasons for the buy back program but reducing second hand supply is not one of them.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@puppygirlhornypost @DJDarren Yes, after spending 20 years as a principal engineer developing consumer electronics products I can really say that. Although I never worked for Apple I do know what the rates are in the industry and since they are due mostly to physical factors they should be similar for Apple. One of the side effects of Moore’s law is that there are far fewer parts on a phone and they are far more complex than 20 years ago. /1

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@puppygirlhornypost @DJDarren perhaps I should mention that the hard problem with recycling electronics is testing to see if the part still works to spec. It can cost more to test a part than to replace it with a new one. This trend has also been driven by Moore. But it’s also driven by what consumers are willing to pay. You lose money if it costs more to refurbish than you can sell it for. So a lot of devices are destroyed because of this.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@puppygirlhornypost @DJDarren I don’t know Apple’s reasoning behind their use of pairing but it sometimes benefits the customer. It allows building systems that work better with less expensive parts because it can be cheaper to match two parts of lower tolerance than to require both parts to have higher tolerance. Maybe Apple’s use is monopolistic rather than good design. If it’s not, phones repaired without matching will be less reliable.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@princessnorah @DJDarren @puppygirlhornypost I have missed that Apple is using the phrase “part pairing” to cover their attempt to limit replacement parts to genuine Apple parts and prevent the use of third party replacements. What I said is true for the sort of pairing that requires both parts to be replaced as a pair but not true for what Apple is doing.

SteveBellovin, to random
@SteveBellovin@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar
MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@SteveBellovin I am surprised that the map doesn’t show Ames-vax connection to UCB. I think it was there by then. I didn’t attach Amelia until the fall though.

ned, (edited ) to random
@ned@mstdn.ca avatar

Louder for those in the back.

There is nothing "innovative" about control of capital resources.

Besides which, those who do the actual creating are just working for a living. They don't have a profit motive, they just want to get paid, whether the funding comes publicly or privately.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@ned When I was at NASA I did research on the impact of public funding on technological innovation and it was much smaller than that image implies. Cell phone technology, despite the claim here, was almost entirely developed by corporations, for example. Governments can be good at funding basic research but tend not to be good at funding directed research and development.

RickiTarr, to random
@RickiTarr@beige.party avatar

If the amount of "justice" you receive is based on how good the lawyers you can afford are, then "justice" is only for the rich.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@RickiTarr My sister is a public defender. She has long said that “the rich get richer and the poor get prison”.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@RickiTarr she is a very good trial lawyer but the state doesn’t allow her the size budget to prepare her case that it gives to the prosecution.

bagder, to random
@bagder@mastodon.social avatar

The value of OSS today?

"from $1.22 billion to $6.22 billion if we were to decide as a society to recreate all widely used OSS on the supply side"

"from $2.59 trillion to $13.18 trillion, if each firm who used an OSS package had to recreate it from scratch"

"5% of programmers are responsible for more than 90% of the value created on the supply- and demand- side"

The report: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4693148

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@bagder IBM alone is responsible for more than 2 billion of that, since they spent at least that much developing Linux. Much of the rest is from other companies, like Google’s investment in Android and the hundreds of companies developing embedded devices. Probably 90 percent was developed by paid professionals.

linux_mclinuxface, to Redis
@linux_mclinuxface@fosstodon.org avatar

Welp. It's official. is no longer

While I wasn't a contributor to the core, I presented on it dozens of times, talked to thousands, and wrote a book about it.

I probably wouldn't have done any of that with that kind of license.

Very disappointed.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@lucasmz @linux_mclinuxface Yes, alas, with a bunch of caveats about jurisdictions varying. If redis owns the copyright on all of the code they can change the license going forward at any time. Revoking the license on already licensed code is tricky but technically allowed under the BSD license.

astro_jcm, to ai
@astro_jcm@mastodon.online avatar

Academic conferences will soon be like "I have more of an generated blurb than a question."

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@astro_jcm So glad I retired from research before this.

RickiTarr, to random
@RickiTarr@beige.party avatar

Are you the person you always thought you would be?

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@RickiTarr I might be the person I thought I would be when I got up this morning. I’ll know for sure after a good night’s sleep.

Teri_Kanefield, (edited ) to random
@Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social avatar

I promised to write something up on legal pundits and how to listen to them.

This is a preliminary draft of my answer.

Monday, when the Supreme Court decision came down, I said this:

If you are upset or angry about the Supreme Court decision in the 14th Amendment ballot case, you are the victim of rage merchants.

I also promised to explain. Here is my explanation.

This is not a crowd pleaser. Sorry.

https://terikanefield.com/the-outrage-machine-strikes-again-14th-amendment-section-3/

DANG the error message is back. Wait a minute and try again.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@Teri_Kanefield Thanks for the excellent blog post. Can you clarify a small point for me? You wrote “(In other words, she wished the 5 other conservatives had just shut up about whether federal legislation was required so that they could have issued a clean anonymous opinion.)” and I wonder if “anonymous” was meant to be “unanimous”? If you did mean anonymous could you elaborate on why anonymity would be good in this specific instance?

RickiTarr, to random
@RickiTarr@beige.party avatar

Please follow me!!!

(into a mysterious bog from which none have returned)

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@RickiTarr I would follow you to the ends of the earth if only it weren’t round.

fraying, to random
@fraying@xoxo.zone avatar

Lemme see if I get this:

If I copy your shit as my own, that's plagiarism and it's bad.

But when I copy everyone's shit and run it through a mystery box that rearranges it until it barely makes sense, that's futuristic technology.

And if I take your shit and sell it, that's copyright violation and it's bad.

But when I make a place for people to post their shit and I just sell access to it so the mystery box people can have it, that's a viable business model.

Makes perfect sense.

MartyFouts,
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@fraying Problem is that you have framed the issues in a way that would mislead someone who doesn’t understand those things and maybe your audience needs to hear about rights assignment in TOS, and the difference between expressive and non expressive use of copyrighted works even if you don’t. Because if one understands those things one would not be confused. If we’re going to fix the underlying problem it would help to describe it better.

parismarx, to apple
@parismarx@mastodon.online avatar

I hope this is the final nail in the coffin of the idea that self-driving cars will make any meaningful difference in transportation. It was never true, but distracted so many people from real solutions for over a decade.

Having more money than sense, Apple threw billions at a bad idea they should’ve pulled the plug on years ago.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-02-27/apple-cancels-work-on-electric-car-shifts-team-to-generative-ai

MartyFouts, (edited )
@MartyFouts@mastodon.online avatar

@parismarx I doubt that Apple abandoning a project that IIRC they never officially announced will have any impact on the 60 or so companies in California that are working on driving automation, except maybe to make some talent available for hire. If Waymo announcing that full driving automation was impossible didn’t deter anyone why would this?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines