Oof. Supreme Court grants certiorari in Loper Bright, which is a vehicle to undermine the Chevron standard. Part of the longstanding conservative dream to dismantle the regulatory state.
This is kind of amazing: Nate Silver rented his election forecasting model to Disney, and now that they’re trying to kick him out, they have only now realized they’re booting their star without the most important asset.
My bet: Disney pays him eight figures to keep the model.
To everyone who thinks they'll be okay if they just play along with the anti-woke crowd:
UNC bent over backwards to placate the right-wing—giving millions to neo-Confederates, denying tenure to Nikole Hannah-Jones—and they're getting attacked by Republicans just the same.
Suggest to me that Bluesky really is ill-prepared to run a social network. They're going down the usual techbro path of putting 45% effort into engineering, 45% effort into looking cool for a handful of investors, 10% effort into solving known difficult problems of products like theirs.
@mmasnick@dangillmor Sure, Bluesky has a plan for moderation: the 'community' will do it, via server-level moderation and third-party 'community labeling' and so forth.
Which is a plan, I suppose, but it's not operational. Their primary moderation method is not even alpha testing yet. If it's true they know what they're doing, then the takeaway is they don't really care about moderation at all, it's an afterthought.
@mmasnick@dangillmor I don't think it's disingenuous to point out that Bluesky (1) isn't ready for moderation at scale and (2) likely won't be ready for moderation at scale anytime soon.
It'd be nice to have a simple Twitter replacement but FYI the #Bluesky approach to moderation is "we'll do basic filtering of the worst stuff, but the rest is up to someone else, users, developers, whatever" https://blueskyweb.xyz/blog/4-13-2023-moderation
Sure, this is dangerous and will get children killed—but have you considered the improved profit margins for hedge funds from this "Precision-Scheduled Railroading"?
"Gorsuch did not disclose the identity of the purchaser. That box was left blank."
Now that's just consciousness of guilt, because he knew how it looked to suddenly sell his property to the chief executive of a massive law firm with regular business before SCOTUS.
Nah. I don't buy it. This thread isn't sincere, it's the CEO of Quora (and board member of #openai ) trying to use Cunningham's Law to gather free advice on training #AI to interpret law.
I am happy to help any AI company with those issues—so long as you pay me. 💅
Sorry, but you can't convince me that the test of a reusable rocket system is supposed to involve destroying the launch site—which was reusable on every prior generation of space flight technology—and launching debris thousands of feet away.
#SpaceX is not a serious company, it's a clown show, and it should not have a single dollar in government funding, much less billions.
If the government is purchasing physical goods that have a competitive non-government market, sure, purchasing from private industry is likely more efficient. Passenger vehicles, chairs, printers, etc.
But for customized items or goods without a competitive non-government market like spacecraft and weaponry, well...
There's no commercial market for manned spaceflight—puffery from investors about space tourism doesn't count, as Virgin Orbit's failure shows—and that's a huge source of SpaceX's revenue. That's just government money going to billionaires so they can blow stuff up for lulz.
A good deep-dive (written pre-launch) on how the largest rocket in history was launched from a dirt-cheap site that would be substandard everywhere else in the world, including Russia and China.
This was a massive regulatory failure, everything from knowingly relying on bad data to outright evasion of review by omitting critical infrastructure.
For a little while, Twitter was the fastest, most reliable newswire in history. Governments, journalists, celebrities, etc worldwide would put breaking news on Twitter first.
And then some goofball paid a ton of money to make it into 4Chan. 🤷♂️
Alito's failure to recuse in this big oil case reminds me of the big pharma case where Alito owned stock, failed to recuse, then remembered to recuse. Cert was granted without him, he saw the briefs filed by big pharma, then decided to un-recuse and wrote an opinion adopting big pharma's arguments. Merck v Albrecht, No. 17-290.
Given the overall circumstances—Crow showered Thomas with gifts before and after, Thomas's mother kept living there, Crow paid for improvements—the only reasonable interpretation is: Thomas and Crow structured the transaction as a loss solely to avoid reporting it.
Crow's claim about buying it for a museum can't be squared with Thomas's mother still living in it after the purchase, the improvements made to the home, nor with Thomas breaking the law to keep it secret.
There are a lot of commentators who claim the path to electoral victory lies in Democrats backpedaling on trans rights.
There are precisely zero (0) actual voters who will swing from voting Republican to voting Democratic on this basis.
In 2022, the GOP in Pennsylvania and Michigan leaned heavily into trans bigotry. Bans on gender transition surgeries, bans on trans athletes, the works.
Normie voters found it weird and creepy. The GOP got their teeth smashed in, huge losses in both states.
I remember when Aaron Swartz was criminally prosecuted for downloading too many academic journal articles, but, sure, it's totally cool to scrape everyone's personal photographs as part of a commercial effort to market discriminatory surveillance tech to police departments.