ct_bergstrom, (edited ) to random
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

After hearing Sebastian Bubeck talk about the paper today, I decided to give another chance.

If it can really reason, it should be able to solve very simple logic puzzles. So I made one up. Sebastian stressed the importance of asking the question right, so I stressed that this is a logic puzzle and didn't add anything confusing about knights and knaves.

Still, it gets the solution wrong.

ct_bergstrom, (edited ) to ChatGPT
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

People keep telling me that is amazing for proofreading text and improving scientific writing.

I just gave a section of a grant proposal and it made 11 suggestions, none of which were worth keeping (often adding or removing a comma, or repeating a preposition in a list).

More interestedly, a number of its suggestions were identical to my originals.

ct_bergstrom, (edited ) to random
@ct_bergstrom@fediscience.org avatar

Listening to very smart people talk about I'm reminded of the joke about a checkers-playing dog.

A guy has a dog that plays checkers. "My goodness," everyone says, "that's amazing. What a brilliant dog!"

"Not really," he replies, "I beat him four games out of five."

That's GPT4. It's capacities are amazing and completely unexpected.

But it's also so limited. You shouldn't back the dog in a checkers tournament, and you shouldn't use an LLM as a medical assistant or in many other ways.

codewiz, to OpenAI
@codewiz@mstdn.io avatar

Testing GPT4 as a prompt generator for DALL-E 3. I asked to make four images at once, and it generated slight variations of the original prompt!

seldoncrisis, to ai
MisuseCase, to microsoft
@MisuseCase@twit.social avatar

Predictably, started injecting ads into powered conversations…and just as predictably, there is now a huge problem in Bing Chat.

It’s actually worse than poisoned advertisements showing up in search engine results for a couple of reasons.

https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/threat-intelligence/2023/09/malicious-ad-served-inside-bing-ai-chatbot

/1

upol, (edited ) to ai
@upol@hci.social avatar

🎯 Explainable AI suffers from an epidemic. I call it Explainability Washing.

💡Think of it as window dressing—techniques, tools, or processes created to provide the illusion of explainability but not delivering it

Let’s use this hyped example from OpenAI. Title is sensational-- Language models can explain neurons in language models.

But is that the case? Let's dig in. 👇

https://openai.com/research/language-models-can-explain-neurons-in-language-models


1/n

mjgardner, to ChatGPT

“Users speak of as ‘hallucinating’ wrong answers — make stuff up and present it as fact when they don’t know the answer. But any answers that happen to be correct were ‘hallucinated’ in the same way.” — @davidgerard, https://davidgerard.co.uk/blockchain/2023/06/03/crypto-collapse-get-in-loser-were-pivoting-to-ai/

” “

devinprater, to ai

Okay y'all, Bing Chat's image descrption thing is now coming around to mobile! You can't share from the share sheet, but you can save images and do it that way. More precise for better descriptions. can still make stuff up though.

The image you sent is a photo realistic image of a black and orange box of an AMD Ryzen 5 processor. The box is on a gray background and has a large red and orange Ryzen logo on the front. The box also has the AMD logo and the words “Ryzen 5” and “5000 Series Processor” on the front. There is a small white sticker on the front of the box that reads “AM4 Socket” and a small orange sticker that reads “Zen 3 Architecture”.

spinfocl, to random German
@spinfocl@fedihum.org avatar

Ok, noch ein -Experiment: Ich habe folgendes Bild interpretieren lassen:

schizanon, to ai
@schizanon@mas.to avatar

: you only care about robots looking at your content now because they started generating their own content. If they had just kept looking at it to better direct users to you you'd still be fine with it.

ErikJonker, to ai
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

Veel posts over wat GPT4 niet kan verhullen af en toe wel hoe hoe goed het is in kennisvragen over complexe onderwerpen, ook met de betrouwbaarheid en de noodzaak tot controleren in het achterhoofd, heeft het daar veel toegevoegde waarde ten opzichte van Google Search. Met name in pure tekstvragen, uitleg van bepaalde concepten, theorieeen, frameworks etc in elke wetenschap die je kunt bedenken.

Jigsaw_You, to ai
@Jigsaw_You@mastodon.nl avatar

“What we are going to see, in the fullness of time, I promise you, is that is more or less in the same ball park as , handy for a bunch of things, but untethered in reality, still with dicey, unpredictable reasoning, and a very limited understanding of the world. Don’t let the PR fool you”

@garymarcus

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-googles-amazing-new?r=8tdk6&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

bornach, to llm
@bornach@masto.ai avatar

Asked (formerly ) a familiar riddle but with numbers changed to make it impossible. It generated the same solution but substituting the numbers so that it ends up with the nonsense claim:

10 + 5 = 23

kellogh, to ai
@kellogh@hachyderm.io avatar
cassidy, to ai
@cassidy@blaede.family avatar

“AI” as currently hyped is giant billion dollar companies blatantly stealing content, disregarding licenses, deceiving about capabilities, and burning the planet in the process.

It is the largest theft of intellectual property in the history of humankind, and these companies are knowingly and willing ignoring the licenses, terms of service, and laws that us lowly individuals are beholden to.

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/06/technology/tech-giants-harvest-data-artificial-intelligence.html?unlocked_article_code=1.ik0.Ofja.L21c1wyW-0xj&ugrp=m

schizanon, to ChatGPT
@schizanon@mas.to avatar

Teachers should allow students to use to write papers, but then just grade them extra hard. All you're doing is proofreading at that point so the paper better be spotless!

mjgardner, to random

The “#AI” debate is highlighting the divide between people who prefer better-sounding answers and those who prefer better answers.

#ArtificialIntelligence#MachineLearning #ML #LLMs #ChatGPT #Copilot #Bing #Bard #OpenAI #Google #GitHub #GPT3 #GPT4

ErikJonker, to ai Dutch
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

The best way to get away from the hype, is using GPT4 (paid version) for a while yourself, it made me less impressed with the "intelligence" part of AI. At the same time it only makes me more convinced that as a tool generative AI has a lot of potential. It can and will be disruptive but please let's stop all the blabla about AGI (my opinion). There are enough risks and problems to think about and act upon with these tools without AGI discussions.

ErikJonker, to ai
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

I was looking for an answer to the simple question, how large is the trained GPT4 model in Gigabyte, terribly hard to find some estimate ? 🤔

ErikJonker, to GraphicsProgramming
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

(continued from previous post)...blackwell GPU will cost $ 30.000 (minimum), so training a GPT4 model with 2000 GPUs costs approx. $ 60 million ? (in 90 days, at a minimum because there are also other costs)
#training #GPT4 #GPU #Nvidia #Blackwell #AI #LLM

ErikJonker, to ai
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

The score of Llama3 70B on the LMSYS leaderboard is impressive. Although it's also clear that the latest GPT-4 is still a lot better. However Llama3 is opensource and freely available and a larger version (400B parameters) is on the way and will be closer to GPT4 with regard to performance on the various benchmarks.
https://chat.lmsys.org/?leaderboard

ErikJonker, to ai
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

Now using paid ChatGPT aka ChatGPT plus as an experiment, quite impressed with GPT4 not so much yet with "GPTs" , but maybe i am not good enough in instructions etcetera.

kellogh, to random
@kellogh@hachyderm.io avatar

seems like the firing is a signal that openai might be becoming more open again. i’d love to see public papers

ErikJonker, to ChatGPT
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social avatar

For me the antidote against was simply trying the paid version of , sure it's expensive but after a few days you experience is NOT intelligent in anyway, AGI is NOT around the corner. At the same time it's a very powerful tool with plugins where i am trying to establish in which contexts it can have added value. It's unreliability, bias, hallucinations etc. are problematic. Sceptics will argue it's useless / should not be used anyway but i don't agree with that (yet)

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • khanakhh
  • megavids
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • modclub
  • ngwrru68w68
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines