w3c, to accessibility
@w3c@w3c.social avatar

Open position! is seeking a full-time Accessibility Specialist to work on digital accessibility standards and supporting materials. This is a unique opportunity to contribute to the vision of an accessible digital future.

See:
https://www.w3.org/careers/2023-accessibility-specialist/

benteh, to accessibility

help, community!

I'm hosting a meetup of frontend webdevelopers in my company (8 teams, 20-25 ppl). We've been working with & accessibility this year. Very old & new applications, so the challenges are diverse.

i'm hoping to find a blind / visually impaired person who could talk (30min?) about what it's like to use the web.

No complicated tech, just how it works, & how you experience it.

I have to negotiate compensation with my CTO.

please retoot?

SteveFaulkner, (edited ) to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

.@w3c WCAG should not be developed/designed for the benefit of testing vendors. It is there to improve the user experience of disabled people.

wai, to accessibility
@wai@w3c.social avatar

WCAG 2.2 is now published as a Web Standard (“W3C Recommendation”)!

For an introduction to WCAG and a link to WCAG 2.2, see the WCAG 2 Overview
https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/

There are a few updates in the WCAG 2 FAQ
https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/faq/

See new "In briefs" in
What's New in WCAG 2.2

https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/

SteveFaulkner, to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

👁️WCAG 2.2 will be published this Thursday! (5th October)

https://www.w3.org/2023/10/03-ag-minutes.html

SteveFaulkner, (edited ) to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

🎯 quick and very dirty target size checker

👏🏽 updated with the help of @siblingpastry

An attempt to make the process of checking 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) as painless and swift as is possible.

👉🏽 Check it out, tear it apart, call me a no good punk, pour scorn, make it better, even better; make something else that works better! AND share it publicly without a restrictive licence

https://html5accessibility.com/stuff/2023/08/28/quick-and-very-dirty-target-size-checker/

ppatel, to accessibility
@ppatel@mstdn.social avatar

Great opportunity.

Open position! is seeking a full-time Specialist to work on digital accessibility standards and supporting materials. This is a unique opportunity to contribute to the vision of an accessible digital future.

See:
https://www.w3.org/careers/2023-accessibility-specialist/

yatil, to accessibility
@yatil@yatil.social avatar

Happy 25 years of WCAG!

On this day in 1999, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 were published. WCAG 2.2 is still one of the most important standards on the web, ensuring a base level of access for everyone.

1.0 – May 5, 1999 https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
2.0 – Dec 11, 2008 https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/
2.1 – Jun 5, 2018 https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
2.2 – Oct 5, 2023 https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/

SteveFaulkner, to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

WCAG 2.2 moved to a Proposed Recommendation (PR) today.

"We expect it will be published as a final W3C Recommendation in late August."

Current draft at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/

marjon, to accessibility
@marjon@a11y.info avatar

Stop it with the "Google/GitHub/WhateverBigWebsite does it, so it's good accessibility practice".

That's an assumption you just can't make and you may well introduce WCAG failures.



patrick_h_lauke, to accessibility
@patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social avatar

a timely reminder to put things into context: annoyed that a particular success criterion, glossary definition, technique etc doesn't cover your specific situation you're facing? keep in mind that the majority of WCAG 2.x was written almost 25 years ago (!)

you're trying to apply thinking and rules to your work today that were dreamt up a quarter of a century ago...

(damn, i feel old)

patrick_h_lauke, to Halloween
@patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social avatar

for i'll go dressed as the Ghost of 4.1.1 Parsing

tayarndt, to accessibility
@tayarndt@techopolis.social avatar

question: For this new plugin I am working on that displays your Mastodon feed , would you like all the posts as headings or just a list?

rachael, to accessibility

WCAG 2.2 moved to a Proposed Recommendation (PR) today. We expect it will be published as a final W3C Recommendation in late August. You can read the current draft at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ and learn more from What’s New in WCAG 2.2 at https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/

juliemoynat, to accessibility French
@juliemoynat@eldritch.cafe avatar

Orange est une entreprise tellement fière de faire des sites inaccessibles qu'elle a même enregistré un sous-domaine captcha.orange.fr pour proposer ce magnifique CAPTCHA totalement inaccessible lorsqu'on s'identifie sur ses sites !!!!

On vous dérange pas trop, Orange, ça va ???

Je vous propose de remplacer la phrase "Vérifions ensemble que vous n'êtes pas un robot" par "Vérifions ensemble que vous n'êtes surtout pas une personne aveugle ou malvoyante".

😤

#accessibilité #inaccessibilité #a11y #RGAA #WCAG #Orange

rachael, to accessibility

WCAG 2.2 has been published as a W3C Recommendation! Read the new recommendation at https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/ and learn more from What’s New in WCAG 2.2 at https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/

Congratulations to everyone on the working group.

SteveFaulkner, to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

🤨
"We expect to publish Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 as a “W3C Recommendation” web standard in 2023.

We are addressing new comments that we received in August 2023. Depending how that goes, the final publication could be in September or later in 2023."

#wcag #W3C #accessibility #webStandards
https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/new-in-22/#status-timeline-changes

ppatel, (edited ) to accessibility
@ppatel@mstdn.social avatar

Are there freelance people or those who have time to work on a possible audit? If you're a beginner in the field and haven't done this kind of work, let me know as well. I'm willing to mentor. Please DM.

zwol, to random

Anyone know off the top of their head why the contrast ratio rules are defined in terms of relative luminance rather than relative lightness?

wai, to accessibility
@wai@w3c.social avatar

You are invited to W3C WAI’s “Evaluating Accessibility: Meeting Key Challenges” Research Symposium online 16 November 2023.

Registration is free and required by Monday 13 November 2023.

Please see the program, schedule, and registration link at:

https://www.w3.org/WAI/about/projects/wai-coop/symposium3/

SteveFaulkner, to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

👁️ Know your Standards
Updated 21/11/2023

"Regularly people link to or quote from some outdated version of a specification. This can be confusing and detrimental to understanding, if the information is no longer correct or relevant."

https://html5accessibility.com/stuff/2020/11/24/know-your-standards/

aardrian, to accessibility
@aardrian@toot.cafe avatar

Remember that talk I gave at just a few months ago?

The video is posted:
https://www.paris-web.fr/2023/conferences/wcagmire.php

Captions in French and English (I provided the English because I am picky).

Slides:
https://adrianroselli.com/2023/09/paris-web-2023-wcagmire.html

benteh, to accessibility

help: a question to all visually impaired: do you know of datavisualisation libraries that works well / good / terrible?

Please retoot :)

@jakobrosin

?

SteveFaulkner, to accessibility
@SteveFaulkner@mastodon.social avatar

Doing what’s required: Indicating mandatory fields in an accessible way

💦 juice from @davidofyork

"It is important to make users aware of required fields upfront. This should prevent them from making submission errors and having to backtrack through a form to fix such errors. But what is the best and most accessible way to indicate required fields? This article aims to explain exactly what’s required."

https://www.tpgi.com/doing-whats-required-indicating-mandatory-fields-in-an-accessible-way/

caztcha, to accessibility
@caztcha@fedibird.com avatar

The Japanese translation of WCAG 2.2 has just been released!

https://waic.jp/translations/WCAG22/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • Durango
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • JUstTest
  • modclub
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • normalnudes
  • everett
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • osvaldo12
  • megavids
  • Leos
  • tester
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines