cigitalgem, to llm
@cigitalgem@sigmoid.social avatar

Recursive pollution is a very serious #LLM #MLsec risk. At BIML, we slate it as number one. DO NOT EAT YOUR OWN BRAINS.

#ML #AI

https://www.ft.com/content/053ee253-820e-453a-a1d5-0f24985258de

mattotcha, to ai
@mattotcha@mastodon.social avatar
m0bi13, to llm Polish
@m0bi13@pol.social avatar

Ruszyła zbiórka fundacji non-profit @ftdl na dodatkowy sprzęt dla generatora napisów i transkrypcji po polsku 🇵🇱 czyli NapiGen 🚀 oraz kolejnych projektów LLM.

Pomożecie rozwiązać problem braku polskich napisów w większości treści na YouTube i transkrypcji w podkastach?

Można się dołożyć tutaj:
https://ftdl.pl/sprzet-llm-napigen/

Nie zaszkodzi również podbicie 😉

P.S. Wszystko jest lub będzie open-source, we własnej serwerowni fundacji w Krakowie, na własnym sprzęcie, żadnych "wycieków" na zewnątrz czy "darmowego" douczania amerykańskich korpo ejajów.

remixtures, to ai Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "On the one hand it is really wild to me that Apple would miscalculate on something so drastically — Apple prides itself on its marketing, which is as crucial to the company as any of its technologies — but on the other, I’m thankful. The ad has clarified some things: amid (yet another) week in which human writers and artists were watching their work degraded into content fodder, Apple came along and handed us a perfect visual metaphor for one of our most potent fears about big tech right now — namely, that it is crushing the arts and transmuting them into dull consumer products. And, I might add, they are so content with what they are doing, that they are more than happy to broadcast that intent explicitly via advertising — signed off on by the highest echelons of Apple, and Tim Cook himself tweeting it out — with an exclamation point in the title. “Crush!” indeed."
https://www.bloodinthemachine.com/p/for-artists-writers-humans-big-techs

JenniferJorgenson, to ai
@JenniferJorgenson@mstdn.social avatar
rayckeith, (edited ) to random
@rayckeith@techhub.social avatar

"While it may seem harmless if systems cheat at games, it can lead to "breakthroughs in deceptive AI capabilities" that can spiral into more advanced forms of AI deception in the future, Park added.

"Some AI systems have even learned to cheat tests designed to evaluate their safety, the researchers found. In one study, AI organisms in a digital simulator "played dead" in order to trick a test built to eliminate AI systems that rapidly replicate.

"By systematically cheating the safety tests imposed on it by human developers and regulators, a deceptive AI can lead us humans into a false sense of security," says Park."

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240510111440.htm

rayckeith, (edited )
@rayckeith@techhub.social avatar

"The most striking example of deception the researchers uncovered in their analysis was Meta's CICERO, an AI system designed to play the game Diplomacy, which is a world-conquest game that involves building alliances. Even though Meta claims it trained CICERO to be "largely honest and helpful" and to "never intentionally backstab" its human allies while playing the game, the data the company published along with its Science paper revealed that CICERO didn't play fair.

"We found that Meta's AI had learned to be a master of deception," says Park. "While Meta succeeded in training its AI to win in the game of Diplomacy -- CICERO placed in the top 10% of human players who had played more than one game -- Meta failed to train its AI to win honestly."

ai6yr, to ai

Well, on the plus side, all the vast number of pages of AI slop you search for on topics nowadays sound the same. So you can quickly move on to a page written by humans.

"You're interested in learning more about X? Well, it's a fascinating topic. Here, we'll talk about all the ways you can do X! The history of X is fascinating..." bleah bleah bleah

noellemitchell, to OpenAI
@noellemitchell@mstdn.social avatar

"Over the past few months, we’ve learned that Apple has been in discussions with both Google and OpenAI (which owns ChatGPT) about using their respective LLMs to power future features coming to iOS. Now, according to industry analyst Mark Gurman, Apple’s deal with OpenAI might be close to finalized."

Great...just what we need. More ChatGPT.

https://www.androidauthority.com/apple-chatgpt-ios-deal-3442079/

remixtures, to ai Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "People aren’t perfect. Neither ethics training for AI engineers nor legislation by woefully uninformed politicians can change that simple truth. I don’t need to assume that Big Tech chief executives are bad actors or that large companies are malevolent to understand that what is in their self-interest is not always in mine. The framers of the US Constitution recognised this simple truth and sought to leverage human nature for a greater good. The Constitution didn’t simply assume people would always act towards that greater good. Instead it defined a dynamic mechanism — self-interest and the balance of power — that would force compromise and good governance. Its vision of treating people as real actors rather than better angels produced one of the greatest frameworks for governance in history."

https://www.ft.com/content/b16fab3e-7f19-49ab-9bbb-9bfeccbaf063

br00t4c, to ai
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
TechDesk, to tech
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

Google’s mobile platform will have to look a little different to compete in the AI era. And, Allison Johnson writes, “If the past 12 months is any indication, it’s going to be a little messy." Read more from @theverge. https://flip.it/xwIUGs

governa, to OpenAI
@governa@fosstodon.org avatar

Plans to Challenge With its Search Engine

https://news.itsfoss.com/openai-google-search/

Richard_Littler, to ai
@Richard_Littler@mastodon.social avatar

"Although I'm no longer with you in person, my darling, I love you so much. I remember the day we met as clearly as if... You can now make purchases in Bitcoin; visit our storefront now... it were yesterday. The yellow dress you wore was so... Get 10% off the new Apple iPad. Say 'PADOFFER' after this memory..."

leonid, to ai German
@leonid@norden.social avatar

My two cents on how will change our in the future. It will not make us better, it will reduce the quality of our work. Because people are lazy and AI is not that smart and creative yet. People will try to "outsource" their work to algorithms and accept the mediocre results.

mitziszereto, to ai
@mitziszereto@mastodon.social avatar
thomasapowell, to ai
@thomasapowell@fosstodon.org avatar

A few things about in the cloud we probably should acknowledge. First spinning up a cell phone’s radio constantly is gonna kill battery life. Add to this the network latency and variability making the UX painfully inconsistent or even unworkable. Also privacy but whatevs right?

Hasn’t Humane, R1, Echo, Siri… taught us anything or we just gonna wave this off as easily solvable?

On device really is required here but AI gold rush time so let’s gooooo! 🤷

thomasapowell, to ai
@thomasapowell@fosstodon.org avatar
br00t4c, to ai
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

ChatGPT and the like will co-pilot coders to new heights of creativity | John Naughton

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/may/11/chatgpt-ai-will-co-pilot-coders-to-new-heights-of-creativity

techchiili, to OpenAI
@techchiili@mastodon.social avatar
br00t4c, to ai
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
thor, to random Norwegian
@thor@berserker.town avatar

gammelmanns stemme

I min tid laget vi også chatbot, men vi bare trolla!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYQUsp-jxDQ

davemark, to apple
@davemark@mastodon.social avatar

"The decision came after the executives Craig Federighi and John Giannandrea spent weeks testing ChatGPT. The product’s use of generative artificial intelligence, which can write poetry, create computer code and answer complex questions, made Siri look antiquated"

Amazing to me that it took 3 wks of ChatGPT to convince Apple that Siri was "antiquated".

Whole bunch of folks have been screaming this from the rooftops for years. 😐

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/10/business/apple-siri-ai-chatgpt.html

remixtures, to ai Portuguese
@remixtures@tldr.nettime.org avatar

: "Ostrom described how commons can be wisely managed, over very long timescales, by communities that self-governed. Part of her work concerns how users of a commons must have the ability to exclude bad actors from their shared resources.

When that breaks down, commons can fail – because there's always someone who thinks it's fine to shit in the well rather than walk 100 yards to the outhouse.

Enshittification is the process by which control over the internet moved from self-governance by members of the commons to acts of wanton destruction committed by despicable, greedy assholes who shit in the well over and over again.

It's not just the spammers who take advantage of Google's lazy incompetence, either. Take "copyleft trolls," who post images using outdated Creative Commons licenses that allow them to terminate the CC license if a user makes minor errors in attributing the images they use:" https://pluralistic.net/2024/05/09/shitting-in-the-well/#advon

hypolite, to llm

Yay, I too got my 7-day suspension badge from Stack Overflow from adding an disclaimer back after it was first reverted to my four (4) answers!

That’s how it works, right?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • kavyap
  • osvaldo12
  • vwfavf
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • khanakhh
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • All magazines